BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hydrogen sulphide (H(2) S) is gaining acceptance as a gaseous signal molecule. However, mechanisms regarding signal termination are not understood. We used stigmatellin and antimycin A, inhibitors of sulphide quinone reductase (SQR), to test the hypothesis that the catabolism of H(2) S involves SQR. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: H(2) S production and consumption were determined in living and intact mouse brain, liver and colonic muscularis externa using gas chromatography and HPLC. Expressions of SQR, ethylmalonic encephalopathy 1 (Ethe1) and thiosulphate transferase (TST; rhodanese) were determined by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: In the colonic muscularis externa, H(2) (35) S was catabolized to [(35) S]-thiosulphate and [(35) S]-sulphate, and stigmatellin reduced both the consumption of H(2) (35) S and formation of [(35) S]-thiosulphate. Stigmatellin also enhanced H(2) S release by the colonic muscularis externa. In the brain, catabolism of H(2) (35) S to [(35) S]-thiosulphate and [(35) S]-sulphate, which was stigmatellin-insensitive, partially accounted for H(2) (35) S consumption, while the remainder was captured as unidentified (35) S that was probably bound to proteins. Levels of mRNA encoding SQR were higher in the colonic muscularis externa and the liver than in the brain. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data support the concept that termination of endogenous H(2) S signalling in the colonic muscularis externa occurs via catabolism to thiosulphate and sulphate partially via a mechanism involving SQR. In the brain, it appears that H(2) S signal termination occurs partially through protein sequestration and partially through catabolism not involving SQR. As H(2) S has beneficial effects in animal models of human disease, we suggest that selective inhibition of SQR is an attractive target for pharmaceutical development.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Hydrogen sulphide (H(2) S) is gaining acceptance as a gaseous signal molecule. However, mechanisms regarding signal termination are not understood. We used stigmatellin and antimycin A, inhibitors of sulphide quinone reductase (SQR), to test the hypothesis that the catabolism of H(2) S involves SQR. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: H(2) S production and consumption were determined in living and intact mouse brain, liver and colonic muscularis externa using gas chromatography and HPLC. Expressions of SQR, ethylmalonic encephalopathy 1 (Ethe1) and thiosulphate transferase (TST; rhodanese) were determined by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: In the colonic muscularis externa, H(2) (35) S was catabolized to [(35) S]-thiosulphate and [(35) S]-sulphate, and stigmatellin reduced both the consumption of H(2) (35) S and formation of [(35) S]-thiosulphate. Stigmatellin also enhanced H(2) S release by the colonic muscularis externa. In the brain, catabolism of H(2) (35) S to [(35) S]-thiosulphate and [(35) S]-sulphate, which was stigmatellin-insensitive, partially accounted for H(2) (35) S consumption, while the remainder was captured as unidentified (35) S that was probably bound to proteins. Levels of mRNA encoding SQR were higher in the colonic muscularis externa and the liver than in the brain. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data support the concept that termination of endogenous H(2) S signalling in the colonic muscularis externa occurs via catabolism to thiosulphate and sulphate partially via a mechanism involving SQR. In the brain, it appears that H(2) S signal termination occurs partially through protein sequestration and partially through catabolism not involving SQR. As H(2) S has beneficial effects in animal models of human disease, we suggest that selective inhibition of SQR is an attractive target for pharmaceutical development.
Authors: José A Brito; Filipa L Sousa; Meike Stelter; Tiago M Bandeiras; Clemens Vonrhein; Miguel Teixeira; Manuela M Pereira; Margarida Archer Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Kenneth R Olson; Michael J Healy; Zhaohong Qin; Nini Skovgaard; Branka Vulesevic; Douglas W Duff; Nathan L Whitfield; Guangdong Yang; Rui Wang; Steve F Perry Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Valeria Tiranti; Carlo Viscomi; Tatjana Hildebrandt; Ivano Di Meo; Rossana Mineri; Cecilia Tiveron; Michael D Levitt; Alessandro Prelle; Gigliola Fagiolari; Marco Rimoldi; Massimo Zeviani Journal: Nat Med Date: 2009-01-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Fabian H Müller; Tiago M Bandeiras; Tim Urich; Miguel Teixeira; Cláudio M Gomes; Arnulf Kletzin Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.501
Authors: Markus Ruetz; Jacques Kumutima; Brianne E Lewis; Milos R Filipovic; Nicolai Lehnert; Timothy L Stemmler; Ruma Banerjee Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Heather B Roman; Lawrence L Hirschberger; Jakub Krijt; Alessandro Valli; Viktor Kožich; Martha H Stipanuk Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 8.401