OBJECTIVE: Daily interruption of sedation (DIS) has multiple proven benefits, but implementation is erratic. Past research on sedative interruption utilisation focused on individual clinicians, ignoring the role of organisations in shaping practice. The authors test the hypothesis that specific hospital organisational characteristics are associated with routine use of DIS. DESIGN AND SETTING: National, mailed survey to a stratified random sample of US hospitals in 2009. Respondents were the lead infection control professionals at each institution. METHODS: Survey items enquired about DIS use, institutional structure, and organisational culture. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the independent association of these factors with DIS use. RESULTS: A total of 386 hospitals formed our final analytic sample; the response rate was 69.4%. Hospitals ranged in size from 25 to 1359 beds. 26% of hospitals were associated with a medical school. Almost 80% reported regular use of DIS for ventilated patients. While 75.4% of hospitals reported having leadership focus on safety culture, only 42.7% reported that their staff were receptive to changes in practice. In a multivariable logistic regression model, structural characteristics such as size and academic affiliation were not associated with use of DIS. However, leadership emphasis on safety culture (p=0.04), staff receptivity to change (p=0.02) and involvement in an infection prevention collaborative (p=0.04) were significantly associated with regular DIS use. CONCLUSIONS: Several elements of hospital organisational culture were associated with regular use of DIS in US hospitals. These findings emphasise the importance of combining specific administrative approaches with strategies to encourage receptivity to change among bedside clinicians in order to successfully implement complex evidence-based practices in the intensive care setting.
OBJECTIVE: Daily interruption of sedation (DIS) has multiple proven benefits, but implementation is erratic. Past research on sedative interruption utilisation focused on individual clinicians, ignoring the role of organisations in shaping practice. The authors test the hypothesis that specific hospital organisational characteristics are associated with routine use of DIS. DESIGN AND SETTING: National, mailed survey to a stratified random sample of US hospitals in 2009. Respondents were the lead infection control professionals at each institution. METHODS: Survey items enquired about DIS use, institutional structure, and organisational culture. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the independent association of these factors with DIS use. RESULTS: A total of 386 hospitals formed our final analytic sample; the response rate was 69.4%. Hospitals ranged in size from 25 to 1359 beds. 26% of hospitals were associated with a medical school. Almost 80% reported regular use of DIS for ventilated patients. While 75.4% of hospitals reported having leadership focus on safety culture, only 42.7% reported that their staff were receptive to changes in practice. In a multivariable logistic regression model, structural characteristics such as size and academic affiliation were not associated with use of DIS. However, leadership emphasis on safety culture (p=0.04), staff receptivity to change (p=0.02) and involvement in an infection prevention collaborative (p=0.04) were significantly associated with regular DIS use. CONCLUSIONS: Several elements of hospital organisational culture were associated with regular use of DIS in US hospitals. These findings emphasise the importance of combining specific administrative approaches with strategies to encourage receptivity to change among bedside clinicians in order to successfully implement complex evidence-based practices in the intensive care setting.
Authors: David T Huang; Gilles Clermont; J Bryan Sexton; Crystal A Karlo; Rachel G Miller; Lisa A Weissfeld; Kathy M Rowan; Derek C Angus Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Sarah L Krein; Russell N Olmsted; Timothy P Hofer; Christine Kowalski; Jane Forman; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Sanjay Saint Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Sarah L Krein; Timothy P Hofer; Christine P Kowalski; Russell N Olmsted; Carol A Kauffman; Jane H Forman; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Sanjay Saint Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Jeremy M Kahn; Francesca A Matthews; Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Susan E Coffin; Michael Klompas; David Classen; Kathleen M Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P Calfee; Erik R Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N Gerding; Frances A Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S Kaye; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A Mermel; Lindsay Nicolle; David A Pegues; Trish M Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D Salgado; Robert A Weinstein; Robert Wise; Deborah S Yokoe Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: A S Multz; D B Chalfin; I M Samson; D R Dantzker; A M Fein; H N Steinberg; M S Niederman; S M Scharf Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Stephen M Shortell; Jill A Marsteller; Michael Lin; Marjorie L Pearson; Shin-Yi Wu; Peter Mendel; Shan Cretin; Mayde Rosen Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Peter J Pronovost; Sean M Berenholtz; Christine Goeschel; Irie Thom; Sam R Watson; Christine G Holzmueller; Julie S Lyon; Lisa H Lubomski; David A Thompson; Dale Needham; Robert Hyzy; Robert Welsh; Gary Roth; Joseph Bander; Laura Morlock; J Bryan Sexton Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Timothy D Girard; John P Kress; Barry D Fuchs; Jason W W Thomason; William D Schweickert; Brenda T Pun; Darren B Taichman; Jan G Dunn; Anne S Pohlman; Paul A Kinniry; James C Jackson; Angelo E Canonico; Richard W Light; Ayumi K Shintani; Jennifer L Thompson; Sharon M Gordon; Jesse B Hall; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-01-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Barbara Sneyers; Pierre-François Laterre; Marc M Perreault; Dominique Wouters; Anne Spinewine Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 9.097