Literature DB >> 21949031

Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Ba' Pham1, Anita Stern, Wendong Chen, Beate Sander, Ava John-Baptiste, Hla-Hla Thein, Tara Gomes, Walter P Wodchis, Ahmed Bayoumi, Márcio Machado, Steven Carcone, Murray Krahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are common in many care settings, with adverse health outcomes and high treatment costs. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of evidence-based strategies to improve current prevention practice in long-term care facilities.
METHODS: We used a validated Markov model to compare current prevention practice with the following 4 quality improvement strategies: (1) pressure redistribution mattresses for all residents, (2) oral nutritional supplements for high-risk residents with recent weight loss, (3) skin emollients for high-risk residents with dry skin, and (4) foam cleansing for high-risk residents requiring incontinence care. Primary outcomes included lifetime risk of stage 2 to 4 pressure ulcers, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lifetime costs, calculated according to a single health care payer's perspective and expressed in 2009 Canadian dollars (Can$1 = US$0.84).
RESULTS: Strategies cost on average $11.66 per resident per week. They reduced lifetime risk; the associated number needed to treat was 45 (strategy 1), 63 (strategy 4), 158 (strategy 3), and 333 (strategy 2). Strategy 1 and 4 minimally improved QALYs and reduced the mean lifetime cost by $115 and $179 per resident, respectively. The cost per QALY gained was approximately $78 000 for strategy 3 and $7.8 million for strategy 2. If decision makers are willing to pay up to $50 000 for 1 QALY gained, the probability that improving prevention is cost-effective is 94% (strategy 4), 82% (strategy 1), 43% (strategy 3), and 1% (strategy 2).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and economic evidence supports pressure redistribution mattresses for all long-term care residents. Improving prevention with perineal foam cleansers and dry skin emollients appears to be cost-effective, but firm conclusions are limited by the available clinical evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21949031     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  18 in total

Review 1.  Improved wound management at lower cost: a sensible goal for Australia.

Authors:  Rosana E Norman; Michelle Gibb; Anthony Dyer; Jennifer Prentice; Stephen Yelland; Qinglu Cheng; Peter A Lazzarini; Keryln Carville; Karen Innes-Walker; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards; Edward Burn; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The Use of a No-sting Barrier Film Treatment Protocol Compared to Routine Clinical Care for the Treatment of Stage 1 and 2 Pressure Injuries in Long-term Care.

Authors:  Adrian Chan; Henry Yu-Hin Siu
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2016-11-17

Review 3.  Turning frequency in adult bedridden patients to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcer: A scoping review.

Authors:  H-S Jocelyn Chew; Emelia Thiara; Violeta Lopez; Shefaly Shorey
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.

Authors:  William V Padula; Benjo A Delarmente
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Turning High-Risk Individuals: An Economic Evaluation of Repositioning Frequency in Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Petros Pechlivanoglou; Mike Paulden; Ba' Pham; Josephine Wong; Susan D Horn; Murray Krahn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Turning for Ulcer Reduction (TURN) Study: An Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Mike Paulden; Nancy Bergstrom; Susan D Horn; Mary Rapp; Anita Stern; Ryan Barrett; Michael Watkiss; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 7.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally E M Bell-Syer; Jo C Dumville; Victoria Middleton; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 8.  Health technologies for the improvement of chronic disease management: a review of the Medical Advisory Secretariat evidence-based analyses between 2006 and 2011.

Authors:  M Nikitovic; S Brener
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 9.  Economic evaluations of guideline-based or strategic interventions for the prevention or treatment of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.561

10.  Pressure ulcer multidisciplinary teams via telemedicine: a pragmatic cluster randomized stepped wedge trial in long term care.

Authors:  Anita Stern; Nicholas Mitsakakis; Mike Paulden; Shabbir Alibhai; Josephine Wong; George Tomlinson; Ann-Sylvia Brooker; Murray Krahn; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.