BACKGROUND: It is not known if verum (real) acupuncture is effective for nausea and vomiting (emesis) during radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly treated 215 blinded cancer patients withverum: penetrating 'deqi' creating acupuncture (n = 109) or non-penetrating sham needles (n = 106) two to three times per week. The patients documented emesis daily during the radiotherapy period. Primary end point was the number of patients with at least one episode of nausea. RESULTS: In the verum and the sham acupuncture group, 70% and 62% experienced nausea at least once during the radiotherapy period (relative risk 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4) for a mean number of 10.1 and 8.7 days. Twenty five percent and 28% vomited, and 42% and 37% used antiemetic drugs at least once, respectively. Ninety-five percent in the verum acupuncture group and 96% in the sham acupuncture group believed that the treatment had been effective against nausea. In both groups, 67% experienced positive effects on relaxation, mood, sleep or pain reduction and 89% wished to receive the treatment again. CONCLUSION:Acupuncture creating deqi is not more effective than sham in radiotherapy-induced nausea, but in this study, nearly all patients in both groups experienced that the treatment was effective for nausea.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: It is not known if verum (real) acupuncture is effective for nausea and vomiting (emesis) during radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly treated 215 blinded cancerpatients with verum: penetrating 'deqi' creating acupuncture (n = 109) or non-penetrating sham needles (n = 106) two to three times per week. The patients documented emesis daily during the radiotherapy period. Primary end point was the number of patients with at least one episode of nausea. RESULTS: In the verum and the sham acupuncture group, 70% and 62% experienced nausea at least once during the radiotherapy period (relative risk 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4) for a mean number of 10.1 and 8.7 days. Twenty five percent and 28% vomited, and 42% and 37% used antiemetic drugs at least once, respectively. Ninety-five percent in the verum acupuncture group and 96% in the sham acupuncture group believed that the treatment had been effective against nausea. In both groups, 67% experienced positive effects on relaxation, mood, sleep or pain reduction and 89% wished to receive the treatment again. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture creating deqi is not more effective than sham in radiotherapy-induced nausea, but in this study, nearly all patients in both groups experienced that the treatment was effective for nausea.
Authors: M Kay Garcia; Jennifer McQuade; Robin Haddad; Sonya Patel; Richard Lee; Peiying Yang; J Lynn Palmer; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christina H Ruhlmann; Franziska Jahn; Karin Jordan; Kristopher Dennis; Ernesto Maranzano; Alexander Molassiotis; Fausto Roila; Petra Feyer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kristopher Dennis; Rehana Jamani; Clare McGrath; Leila Makhani; Henry Lam; Patrick Bauer; Carlo De Angelis; Natalie Coburn; C Shun Wong; Edward Chow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Thordis K Thorsteinsdottir; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Johan Stranne; Ulrica Wilderäng; Eva Haglind; Gunnar Steineck Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sarah Prinsloo; David I Rosenthal; Mary Kay Garcia; Zhiqiang Meng; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Maria T Chao; Alexandra Chang; Sanjay Reddy; James D Harrison; Joseph Acquah; Miria Toveg; Trilce Santana; Frederick M Hecht Journal: J Integr Med Date: 2016-05