Literature DB >> 21948776

Compression-compression fatigue of selective electron beam melted cellular titanium (Ti-6Al-4V).

Nikolas W Hrabe1, Peter Heinl, Brian Flinn, Carolin Körner, Rajendra K Bordia.   

Abstract

Regular 3D periodic porous Ti-6Al-4V structures intended to reduce the effects of stress shielding in load-bearing bone replacement implants (e.g., hip stems) were fabricated over a range of relative densities (0.17-0.40) and pore sizes (approximately 500-1500 μm) using selective electron beam melting (EBM). Compression-compression fatigue testing (15 Hz, R = 0.1) resulted in normalized fatigue strengths at 10(6) cycles ranging from 0.15 to 0.25, which is lower than the expected value of 0.4 for solid material of the same acicular α microstructure. The three possible reasons for this reduced fatigue lifetime are stress concentrations from closed porosity observed within struts, stress concentrations from observed strut surface features (sintered particles and texture lines), and microstructure (either acicular α or martensite) with less than optimal high-cycle fatigue resistance. 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21948776     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  12 in total

Review 1.  Properties of open-cell porous metals and alloys for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Maintenance of a bone collagen phenotype by osteoblast-like cells in 3D periodic porous titanium (Ti-6Al-4 V) structures fabricated by selective electron beam melting.

Authors:  Nikolas W Hrabe; Peter Heinl; Rajendra K Bordia; Carolin Körner; Russell J Fernandes
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.417

3.  Fatigue life of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V scaffolds under tension-tension, tension-compression and compression-compression fatigue load.

Authors:  Karel Lietaert; Antonio Cutolo; Dries Boey; Brecht Van Hooreweder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Biomedical Porous Shape Memory Alloys for Hard-Tissue Replacement Materials.

Authors:  Bin Yuan; Min Zhu; Chi Yuen Chung
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Stress Concentration and Mechanical Strength of Cubic Lattice Architectures.

Authors:  Paul Lohmuller; Julien Favre; Boris Piotrowski; Samuel Kenzari; Pascal Laheurte
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Bioprinting on 3D Printed Titanium Scaffolds for Periodontal Ligament Regeneration.

Authors:  Ui-Lyong Lee; Seokhwan Yun; Hua-Lian Cao; Geunseon Ahn; Jin-Hyung Shim; Su-Heon Woo; Pill-Hoon Choung
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Titanium-Based Hip Stems with Drug Delivery Functionality through Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Martin B Bezuidenhout; Dimitar M Dimitrov; Anton D van Staden; Gert A Oosthuizen; Leon M T Dicks
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Analytical relationships for prediction of the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials.

Authors:  Amir Abbas Zadpoor; Reza Hedayati
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Comparison of conventional reconstruction plate versus direct metal laser sintering plate: an in vitro mechanical characteristics study.

Authors:  Pusheng Xie; Hanbin Ouyang; Yuping Deng; Yang Yang; Jing Xu; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Characterization of dimensional, morphological and morphometric features of retrieved 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dall'Ava; Harry Hothi; Johann Henckel; Anna Di Laura; Paul Shearing; Alister Hart
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.