Literature DB >> 21947806

Provider, patient and public benefits from a NICE appraisal of bevacizumab (Avastin).

Catherine Rhodes1, John Harris, John Sulston, Catherine Spanswick.   

Abstract

There are several good reasons for the UK Department of Health to recommend the appraisal of bevacizumab for the treatment of eye conditions by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. These reasons will extend to other drugs when similar situations arise in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947806      PMCID: PMC3541520          DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Health ministers may call for appraisal of unlicensed cancer drug for eye treatment.

Authors:  Nigel Hawkes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-06

2.  The price of sight--ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and the treatment of macular degeneration.

Authors:  Robert Steinbrook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Battle over eye medicine gives drugmaker a dose of reality.

Authors:  Erika Check Hayden
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Therapeutic anti-VEGF in age-related macular degeneration: Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab controversy.

Authors:  S Flores Moreno; J Bautista Paloma
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Ophthaproblem. Wet age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Dominik W Podbielski; Jason Noble
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Bevacizumab vs ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration: 1-year outcomes of a prospective, double-masked randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  M L Subramanian; G Abedi; S Ness; E Ahmed; M Fenberg; M K Daly; A Houranieh; E B Feinberg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus bevacizumab (Avastin): modelling cost effectiveness.

Authors:  James Raftery; Andrew Clegg; Jeremy Jones; Seng Chuen Tan; Andrew Lotery
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.