Literature DB >> 21947805

A fair share for the orphans: ethical guidelines for a fair distribution of resources within the bounds of the 10-year-old European Orphan Drug Regulation.

Wim Pinxten1, Yvonne Denier, Marc Dooms, Jean-Jacques Cassiman, Kris Dierickx.   

Abstract

For a significant number of patients, there exists no, or only little, interest in developing a treatment for their disease or condition. Especially with regard to rare diseases, the lack of commercial interest in drug development is a burning issue. Several interventions have been made in the regulatory field in order to address the commercial disinterest in these conditions. However, existing regulations mainly focus on the provision of incentives to the sponsors of clinical trials of orphan drugs, and leave unanswered the overarching question about the rightful place of orphan drugs in resource allocation systems. In this article, we analyse the ethical aspects of funding research and development in the field of rare diseases. We then propose an ethical framework that can help health policy makers move forward in the difficult matter of fairly allocating resources for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947805     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Ethical Questions Linked to Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaroslav Kacetl; Petra Marešová; Raihan Maskuriy; Ali Selamat
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 2.  Unintended effects of orphan product designation for rare neurological diseases.

Authors:  Sinéad M Murphy; Araya Puwanant; Robert C Griggs
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 3.  How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.

Authors:  Bettina M Zimmermann; Johanna Eichinger; Matthias R Baumgartner
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  Value-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs: a scoping review and decision framework.

Authors:  Mike Paulden; Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Assessing the Value of Nusinersen for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Comparative Analysis of Reimbursement Submission and Appraisal in European Countries.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Teresa Barcina Lacosta; Mondher Toumi; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Ethical values and principles to guide the fair allocation of resources in response to a pandemic: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Lydia O'Sullivan; Edelweiss Aldasoro; Áine O'Brien; Maeve Nolan; Cliona McGovern; Áine Carroll
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.834

8.  Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation.

Authors:  Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Jacob Willet; Donna Rindress; Mireille Goetghebeur
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.

Authors:  Tamás Zelei; Mária J Molnár; Márta Szegedi; Zoltán Kaló
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.123

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.