Literature DB >> 21947765

On cochlear impedances and the miscomputation of power gain.

Christopher A Shera1, Elizabeth S Olson, John J Guinan.   

Abstract

In their article, "Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear," Ren et al. (Nat Commun 2:216, 2011) claim to provide "the first direct experimental evidence of power amplification in the sensitive living cochlea." While we recognize the technical challenges of the experiments and appreciate the beauty of the data, the authors' analysis and interpretation of the measurements are invalid. We review the concept of impedance (i.e., the ratio of pressure to velocity) as it applies to cochlear mechanics and show that Ren et al. mistakenly equate the impedances near the basilar membrane and stapes with the impedance characteristic of an infinite, uniform tube of fluid. As a consequence of this error, Ren et al.'s measurements and analysis provide no evidence for power amplification in the cochlea. Compelling evidence for power amplification has, however, been previously provided by others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947765      PMCID: PMC3214245          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0287-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  17 in total

1.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The cochlear compromise.

Authors:  G Zweig; R Lipes; J R Pierce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sharp mechanical tuning in a cochlear model without negative damping.

Authors:  P J Kolston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of WKB calculations and experimental results for three-dimensional cochlear models.

Authors:  C R Steele; L A Taber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  P Martin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Input impedance of the cochlea in cat.

Authors:  T J Lynch; V Nedzelnitsky; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Jiangang Gao; David Z Z He; Xudong Wu; Shuping Jia; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reply to "on cochlear impedances and the miscomputation of power gain" by Shera et Al. J. Assoc. Re. Otolaryngol.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-21

2.  Cochlear Outer-Hair-Cell Power Generation and Viscous Fluid Loss.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.