INTRODUCTION: Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is an alternative to wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions, with reported lower rates of positive surgical margins. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive RSL procedures performed at a single institution from 01/2003 through 10/2010 was conducted. RESULTS: One thousand RSL breast procedures were performed in 978 patients. Indications for RSL included invasive carcinoma (52%), in situ carcinoma (22%), atypical hyperplasia (11%), and suspicious percutaneous biopsy findings (15%). A total of 1,148 seeds were deployed using image guidance, with 76% placed ≥1 day before surgery. Most procedures (86%) utilized one seed. A negative margin was achieved at the first operation in 97% of patients with invasive carcinoma and 97% of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). An additional 9% of patients with invasive carcinoma and 19% of patients with DCIS had close (≤2 mm) margins, and underwent re-excision. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was successfully performed in 99.8% of cases. Adverse events included 3 seeds (0.3%) not deployed correctly on first attempt and 30 seeds (2.6%) displaced from the breast specimen during excision of the targeted lesion. All seeds were successfully retrieved, with no radiation safety concerns. Local recurrence rates were 0.9% for invasive breast cancer and 3% for DCIS after mean follow-up of 33 months. There was no evidence of a learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: RSL is a safe, effective procedure that is easy to learn, with a low incidence of positive/close margins. RSL should be considered as the method of choice for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
INTRODUCTION: Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is an alternative to wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions, with reported lower rates of positive surgical margins. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive RSL procedures performed at a single institution from 01/2003 through 10/2010 was conducted. RESULTS: One thousand RSL breast procedures were performed in 978 patients. Indications for RSL included invasive carcinoma (52%), in situ carcinoma (22%), atypical hyperplasia (11%), and suspicious percutaneous biopsy findings (15%). A total of 1,148 seeds were deployed using image guidance, with 76% placed ≥1 day before surgery. Most procedures (86%) utilized one seed. A negative margin was achieved at the first operation in 97% of patients with invasive carcinoma and 97% of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). An additional 9% of patients with invasive carcinoma and 19% of patients with DCIS had close (≤2 mm) margins, and underwent re-excision. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was successfully performed in 99.8% of cases. Adverse events included 3 seeds (0.3%) not deployed correctly on first attempt and 30 seeds (2.6%) displaced from the breast specimen during excision of the targeted lesion. All seeds were successfully retrieved, with no radiation safety concerns. Local recurrence rates were 0.9% for invasive breast cancer and 3% for DCIS after mean follow-up of 33 months. There was no evidence of a learning curve. CONCLUSIONS:RSL is a safe, effective procedure that is easy to learn, with a low incidence of positive/close margins. RSL should be considered as the method of choice for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Authors: Christina Bluemel; Andreas Cramer; Christoph Grossmann; Georg W Kajdi; Uwe Malzahn; Nora Lamp; Heinz-Jakob Langen; Jan Schmid; Andreas K Buck; Hanns-Jörg Grimminger; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Erica V Bloomquist; Nicolas Ajkay; Sujata Patil; Abigail E Collett; Thomas G Frazier; Andrea V Barrio Journal: Breast J Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Abigail S Caudle; Wei T Yang; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Daliah M Black; Rosa Hwang; Brian Hobbs; Kelly K Hunt; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Henry M Kuerer Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Robert Milligan; Andrew Pieri; Adam Critchley; Richard Peace; Tom Lennard; J M O'Donoghue; Rachel Howitt; Stewart Nicholson; Henry Cain; George Petrides; Nidhi Sibal Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: James O Murphy; Tracy-Ann Moo; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee; Kristine A Villegas; Michelle Stempel; Anne Eaton; Jean M St Germain; Elizabeth Morris; Monica Morrow Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 5.344