Literature DB >> 2194715

A comparative double-blind study of terbinafine (Lamisil) and griseofulvin in tinea corporis and tinea cruris.

A del Palacio Hernandez1, S López Gómez, F González Lastra, P Moreno Palancar, L Iglesias Díez.   

Abstract

In a double-blind randomized study, 92 patients with culturally proven tinea corporis and/or tinea cruris were treated orally with either terbinafine (Lamisil) (125 mg b.i.d.) or griseofulvin (500 mg b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks. The two groups of patients and distribution of the target lesions were similar, but the analysis of the clinical scores showed that the terbinafine group had slightly higher mean scores at baseline (P = 0.186). At the end of therapy the proportion of patients with negative microscopy and culture was 78% in the terbinafine group and 83% in the griseofulvin-treated group. At the assessment 8 weeks after the end of therapy the percentages of terbinafine- and griseofulvin-treated patients with negative mycology were 93 and 95%, respectively. There were three relapses after mycological cure in the griseofulvin group (8%) and two in the terbinafine group (4%). Griseofulvin-treated patients were treated for shorter periods than terbinafine-treated patients (i.e. 58% compared to 26% received only 2-4 weeks of therapy). In terms of overall effectiveness, there were no significant differences between the two treatments. Thirty-seven terbinafine patients (77%) compared to 36 griseofulvin patients (82%) had overall effective therapy. Eight terbinafine patients (16%) compared to 10 griseofulvin patients (20%) experienced at least one adverse event. Five patients in the terbinafine group and six in the griseofulvin group had to stop the treatment due to headaches or gastrointestinal disorders. One terbinafine patient had an elevation of liver function tests after 6 weeks of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2194715     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1990.tb02074.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0307-6938            Impact factor:   3.470


  8 in total

1.  A belt buckle allergy?

Authors:  R Usatine
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-05

Review 2.  Adverse drug reactions to systemic antifungals. Prevention and management.

Authors:  J R Perfect; M H Lindsay; R H Drew
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Tinea gladiatorum: wrestling's emerging foe.

Authors:  T D Kohl; M Lisney
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Treatment and prophylaxis of tinea infections.

Authors:  G E Piérard; J E Arrese; C Piérard-Franchimont
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Terbinafine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in superficial mycoses.

Authors:  J A Balfour; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Update on terbinafine with a focus on dermatophytoses.

Authors:  Jason G Newland; Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2009-04-21

7.  Oral Isotretinoin Combined with Oral Terbinafine Versus Oral Terbinafine Alone to Treat Recurrent Dermatophytosis: An Open-Label Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kaushal K Verma; Gridharan Senthilnathan; Saurabh Bhatia; Immaculata Xess; Vishal Gupta; Sada Nand Dwivedi; Kanika Sahni
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2021-11-22

8.  Relapse after Oral Terbinafine Therapy in Dermatophytosis: A Clinical and Mycological Study.

Authors:  Imran Majid; Gousia Sheikh; Farhath Kanth; Rubeena Hakak
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.