Literature DB >> 21947094

In vitro activity of retapamulin against linezolid and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

F J Candel1, G Morales, J J Picazo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the in vitro activity of retapamulin and other topical antibiotics (mupirocin, bacitracin, and fusidic acid) usually employed for nasal decolonization, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and linezolid and methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
METHODS: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and of the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Presence of the cfr gene in linezolid and methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates was detected using polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Retapamulin inhibited all the isolates of MSSA and MRSA at 0.125 mg/L, but the 18 linezolid-resistant-MRSA strains proved resistant, with MICs over 32 mg/L. Most MSSA isolates (9/10) were susceptible to mupirocin with MICs under 0.19 mg/L, although this value decreased to half against MRSA, and almost all linezolid-resistant MRSA (17/18) strains were resistant to mupirocin with an MIC range of between 8 mg/L and 28 mg/L. The MIC of fusidic acid increased substantially against linezolid-resistant MRSA, whereas that of bacitracin showed no differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Retapamulin demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against MSSA and MRSA strains, but not against MRSA isolates harbouring the cfr gene. The results of this in vitro study support cut-off values for retapamulin of ≤ 0.5, 1, and ≥ 2 mg/L for susceptible, intermediate, and resistant strains, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter        ISSN: 0214-3429            Impact factor:   1.553


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  In Vitro Activity of Retapamulin against Staphylococcus aureus Resistant to Various Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Louis D Saravolatz; Joan Pawlak; Stephanie N Saravolatz; Leonard B Johnson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Does the nose know? An update on MRSA decolonization strategies.

Authors:  C L Abad; M S Pulia; N Safdar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Retapamulin Activity Against Pediatric Strains of Mupirocin-resistant Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ami B Patel; Jennifer Lighter; Yi Fulmer; Richard Copin; Adam J Ratner; Bo Shopsin
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Fusidic Acid and Retapamulin against Mupirocin- and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Park; Jin Kyung Kim; Kun Park
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 1.444

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.