Literature DB >> 21946283

Novel probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy criteria and interobserver agreement for the detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Srinivas Gaddam1, Sharad C Mathur, Mandeep Singh, Jaya Arora, Sachin B Wani, Neil Gupta, Andrew Overhiser, Amit Rastogi, Vikas Singh, Neel Desai, Sandra B Hall, Ajay Bansal, Prateek Sharma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an imaging technique that allows real-time in vivo histological assessment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). The objectives of this study were to create and test novel pCLE criteria for dysplastic BE (phase I), and to evaluate accuracy, interobserver variability, and learning curve in dysplasia prediction (phase II) using these criteria.
METHODS: In phase I, using 50 pCLE videos, a pCLE expert and gastrointestinal pathologist formulated new BE criteria by consensus. These criteria were tested and refined in an independent set of 30 pCLE videos. In phase II, a formal training session for all assessors (three each experts/trainees) was conducted. Finally, using 75 testing videos, each video was interpreted as dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/cancer) vs. no dysplasia and the assessors' confidence in interpretation was noted. Interobserver agreement and accuracy (95% confidence interval (CI)) were determined for BE histology prediction.
RESULTS: Of multiple pCLE criteria tested (phase I), only those with ≥70% sensitivity or specificity were included in the final set: epithelial surface: saw-toothed; cells: enlarged; cells: pleomorphic; glands: not equidistant; glands: unequal in size and shape; goblet cells: not easily identified. Overall accuracy in diagnosing dysplasia was 81.5% (95% CI: 77.5-81), with no difference between experts vs. non-experts. Accuracy of prediction was significantly higher when endoscopists were "confident" about their diagnosis (98% (95-99) vs. 62% (54-70), P<0.001). Accuracy of dysplasia prediction for the first 30 videos was not different from the last 45 (93 vs. 81%, P=0.51). Overall agreement of the criteria was substantial, κ=0.61 (0.53-0.69), with no difference between experts and non-experts.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the development and validation of new pCLE criteria for the prediction of HGD/cancer in BE patients. Using these criteria, this study demonstrated that overall accuracy in predicting dysplasia was high with substantial interobserver agreement. After a structured teaching session, accuracy and agreement between experienced and non-experienced observers was not different, suggesting a short learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946283     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  39 in total

1.  Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  K K Wang; J M Tian; E Gorospe; J Penfield; G Prasad; T Goddard; M Wongkeesong; N S Buttar; L Lutzke; S Krishnadath
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: current issues and future directions.

Authors:  Sung E Choi; Chin Hur
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Confocal endomicroscopy: Is it time to move on?

Authors:  Carlos Robles-Medranda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-10

4.  Intraoperative confocal laser endomicroscopy for real-time in vivo tissue characterization during surgical procedures.

Authors:  David Fuks; Angelo Pierangelo; Pierre Validire; Marine Lefevre; Abdelali Benali; Guillaume Trebuchet; Aline Criton; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Emerging optical methods for surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Matthew B Sturm; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Establishing a diagnosis in indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures: is confocal laser endomicroscopy the answer?

Authors:  Evangelos Kalaitzakis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Brian R Davis; Abdulrahim Alawashez; Salvatore Docimo; Alia Qureshi; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Quantitative analysis of high-resolution microendoscopic images for diagnosis of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Dongsuk Shin; Michelle H Lee; Alexandros D Polydorides; Mark C Pierce; Peter M Vila; Neil D Parikh; Daniel G Rosen; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Confocal laser endomicroscopy of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a new era of optical diagnosis?

Authors:  Stephanie P Chen; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Optical molecular imaging in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Jennifer Carns; Pelham Keahey; Timothy Quang; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.