Literature DB >> 21946219

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery expands the surgical options for high-risks patients.

Michael R Petracek1, Marzia Leacche, Natalia Solenkova, Ramanan Umakanthan, Rashid M Ahmad, Stephen K Ball, Steven J Hoff, Tarek S Absi, Jorge M Balaguer, John G Byrne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A simplified minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) approach avoiding cross-clamping and cardioplegic myocardial arrest using a small (5 cm) right antero-lateral incision was developed. We hypothesized that, in high-risk patients and in patients with prior sternotomy, this approach would yield superior results compared to those predicted by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) algorithm for standard median sternotomy mitral valve surgery.
METHODS: Five hundred and four consecutive patients (249 males/255 females), median age 65 years (range 20-92 years) underwent MIMVS between 1/06 and 8/09. Median preoperative New York Heart Association function class was 3 (range 1-4). Eighty-two (16%) patients had an ejection fraction ≤35%. Forty-seven (9%) had a STS predicted mortality ≥10%. Under cold fibrillatory arrest (median temperature 28°C) without aortic cross-clamp, mitral valve repair (224/504, 44%) or replacement (280/504, 56%) was performed.
RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 2.2% (11/504). In patients with a STS predicted mortality ≥ 10% (range 10%-67%), the observed 30-day mortality was 4% (2/47), lower than the mean STS predicted mortality of 20%. Morbidity in this high-risk group was equally low: 1 of 47 (2%) patients underwent reexploration for bleeding, 1 of 47 (2%) patients suffered a permanent neurologic deficit, none had wound infection. The median length of stay was 8 days (range 1-68 days).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MIMVS without aortic cross-clamp is reproducible with low mortality and morbidity rates. This approach expands the surgical options for high-risk patients and yields to superior results than the conventional median sternotomy approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946219     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182300399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

1.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping.

Authors:  Michael R Petracek
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

2.  Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery via Mini-Thoracotomy: Current Update.

Authors:  Serguei I Melnitchouk; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Michael A Borger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 3.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: current status.

Authors:  Lawrence H Cohn; John G Byrne
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

4.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with excellent resource utilization, cost, and outcomes.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Samuel M Kessel; Jolian J Dahl; Irving L Kron; John A Kern; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Minimally invasive fibrillating mitral valve replacement for patients with advanced cardiomyopathy: a safe and effective approach to treat a complex problem.

Authors:  Evan L Brittain; Sandeep K Goyal; Matthew A Sample; Marzia Leacche; Tarek S Absi; Frank Papa; Keith B Churchwell; Stephen Ball; John G Byrne; Simon Maltais; Michael R Petracek; Lisa Mendes
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve replacement: no aortic cross-clamping and no cardioplegia.

Authors:  Hong Rae Kim; Gwan Sic Kim; Jae Suk Yoo; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-05

7.  Right anterolateral thoracotomy: an attractive alternative to repeat sternotomy for high-risk patients undergoing reoperative mitral and tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Hailong Cao; Qing Zhou; Fudong Fan; Yunxing Xue; Jun Pan; Dongjin Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral).

Authors:  Rebecca H Maier; Adetayo S Kasim; Joseph Zacharias; Luke Vale; Richard Graham; Antony Walker; Grzegorz Laskawski; Ranjit Deshpande; Andrew Goodwin; Simon Kendall; Gavin J Murphy; Vipin Zamvar; Renzo Pessotto; Clinton Lloyd; Malcolm Dalrymple-Hay; Roberto Casula; Hunaid A Vohra; Franco Ciulli; Massimo Caputo; Serban Stoica; Max Baghai; Gunaratnam Niranjan; Prakash P Punjabi; Olaf Wendler; Leanne Marsay; Cristina Fernandez-Garcia; Paul Modi; Bilal H Kirmani; Mark D Pullan; Andrew D Muir; Dimitrios Pousios; Helen C Hancock; Enoch Akowuah
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Percutaneous and minimally invasive approaches to mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation-new devices and emerging outcomes.

Authors:  Fadi E Shamoun; Ryan C Craner; Rita Von Seggern; Gerges Makar; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.