Literature DB >> 21946172

Detection of polyomavirus BK reactivation after renal transplantation using an intensive decoy cell surveillance program is cost-effective.

Aron Chakera1, Oliver-James Dyar, Elizabeth Hughes, Sophia Bennett, David Hughes, Ian S D Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of polyomavirus BK (BKV) after renal transplantation can lead to allograft dysfunction or loss with early detection improving outcomes. Current guidelines recommend quantitative polymerase chain reaction for surveillance; however, urinary decoy cell detection is a potentially cost-effective alternative. We present the outcomes from an early intensive BKV surveillance program using decoy cell detection for initial screening starting 2 weeks after transplantation.
METHODS: Records for all recipients of kidney (n=211) or simultaneous kidney and pancreas (n=102) transplants performed over 2 years in a single center were reviewed. Follow-up was for a minimum of 1 year. Urine cytology screening was performed fortnightly from 0 to 3 months after transplantation, monthly from 3 to 6 months then every 2 months from 6 to 12 months.
RESULTS: Decoy cell positivity occurred in 56 of 313 patients (17.9%) with sustained decoy cell positivity (≥2 positive urine samples >2 weeks apart) present in 32 patients (10.2%). Twenty-four patients (7.6%) became viremic and three patients (1%) developed polyoma virus nephropathy. The median time after transplantation until decoy cell positivity was 78 days, decreasing to 67 days for patients with sustained positivity and 57 days for patients who developed polyoma virus nephropathy. No grafts were lost due to BKV during the study period. Decoy cell screening resulted in savings of approximately £135,000 over 2 years, when compared with routine surveillance by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant BKV reactivation occurs early after transplantation and can be reliably detected by decoy cell screening. A surveillance strategy for detecting BKV reactivation based on urine cytology is cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946172     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318230c09b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Management of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Dirk R J Kuypers
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 3.  BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  George R Ambalathingal; Ross S Francis; Mark J Smyth; Corey Smith; Rajiv Khanna
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Bright Field Microscopy to Detect Decoy Cells Due to BK Virus Infection in the Fresh and Unstained Urine Sediment in Kidney Allograft Recipients.

Authors:  José A T Poloni; Gabriel G Pinto; Maria S B Giordani; Elizete Keitel; Nadiana Inocente; Carlos F Voegeli; Giovanni B Fogazzi; Alessandro C Pasqualotto; Liane N Rotta
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Fatal SV40-associated pneumonia and nephropathy following renal allotransplantation in rhesus macaque.

Authors:  M Song; M S Mulvihill; K D Williams; B H Collins; A D Kirk
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 0.667

6.  Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Rebecca Konietzny; Roman Fischer; Nicola Ternette; Cynthia A Wright; Ben W Turney; Aron Chakera; David Hughes; Benedikt M Kessler; Chris W Pugh
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.988

7.  Polyomavirus nephropathy: quantitative urinary polyomavirus-Haufen testing accurately predicts the degree of intrarenal viral disease.

Authors:  Harsharan K Singh; Howard Reisner; Vimal K Derebail; Tomasz Kozlowski; Volker Nickeleit
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Polyomaviruses and disease: is there more to know than viremia and viruria?

Authors:  Volker Nickeleit; Harsharan K Singh
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Outcomes of renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection and BK virus surveillance in the Auckland region from 2006 to 2012.

Authors:  Chun-Yuan Hsiao; Helen L Pilmore; Lifeng Zhou; Janak R de Zoysa
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-06

10.  IL28B rs12979860 genotype as a predictor marker of progression to BKVirus Associated nephropathy, after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Roee Dvir; Vera Paloschi; Filippo Canducci; Giacomo Dell'Antonio; Sara Racca; Rossana Caldara; Giuseppe Pantaleo; Massimo Clementi; Antonio Secchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.