Literature DB >> 21946023

Is there a valid app for that? Validity of a free pedometer iPhone application.

Randall J Bergman1, Justin W Spellman, Michael E Hall, Shawn M Bergman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the validity of a selected free pedometer application (iPedometer; IP) for the iPhone that could be used to assess physical activity.
METHODS: Twenty college students (10 men, 10 women; mean age: 21.85 ± 1.57 yrs) wore an iPhone at 3 locations (pocket, waist, arm) and a StepWatch 3 Step Activity Monitor (SW) on their right ankle while walking on a treadmill at 5 different speeds (54, 67, 80, 94, 107 m·min(-1)). A research assistant counted steps with a tally counter (TC).
RESULTS: Statistical significance between the TC, SW, and IP was found during every condition except IP in the pocket at 107 m·min(-1) (F(2,38) = .64, P = .54). Correlations involving the IP revealed only 1 positive correlation (IP on arm at 54 m·min(-1)) for any of the conditions (r = .46, P = .05).
CONCLUSION: The IP application was not accurate in counting steps and recorded significantly lower step counts than the SW and TC. Thus, the free pedometer application used is not a valid instrument for monitoring activity during treadmill walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946023     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.9.5.670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mobile Apps to Quantify Aspects of Physical Activity: a Systematic Review on its Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Anabela G Silva; Patrícia Simões; Alexandra Queirós; Mário Rodrigues; Nelson P Rocha
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart® HR and StepWatch 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.

Authors:  Frederik Rose Svarre; Mads Møller Jensen; Josephine Nielsen; Morten Villumsen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Can Commercially Available Pedometers Be Used For Physical Activity Monitoring In Patients With COPD Following Exacerbations?

Authors:  Valentin Prieto-Centurion; Nina Bracken; Lourdes Norwick; Farhan Zaidi; Amelia A Mutso; Victoria Morken; David B Coultas; Cynthia S Rand; David X Marquez; Jerry A Krishnan
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2016

Review 4.  Toward Harmonized Treadmill-Based Validation of Step-Counting Wearable Technologies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christopher C Moore; Aston K McCullough; Elroy J Aguiar; Scott W Ducharme; Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-07-11

5.  Mobile Jump Assessment (mJump): A Descriptive and Inferential Study.

Authors:  Alvaro Mateos-Angulo; Alejandro Galán-Mercant; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2015-08-26

6.  Validity of the Samsung Phone S Health application for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking and running: Does phone placement matter?

Authors:  Marquell Johnson; Jillian Turek; Chelsea Dornfeld; Jennifer Drews; Nicole Hansen
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2016-06-14

7.  Comparison of Self-Reported vs Objective Measures of Long-Term Community Ambulation in Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Bradeigh Godfrey; Christopher Duncan; Teri Rosenbaum-Chou
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2022-07-28

8.  Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason Fanning; Sean P Mullen; Edward McAuley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Mobile Phone and Web 2.0 Technologies for Weight Management: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Marco Bardus; Jane R Smith; Laya Samaha; Charles Abraham
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Accuracy of a smartphone pedometer application according to different speeds and mobile phone locations in a laboratory context.

Authors:  Bastien Presset; Balazs Laurenczy; Davide Malatesta; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.103

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.