Literature DB >> 21945130

Efficacy and safety of the seven-day buprenorphine transdermal system in opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain: an enriched, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Deborah J Steiner1, Steve Sitar, Warren Wen, Gosford Sawyerr, Catherine Munera, Steven R Ripa, Craig Landau.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated.
OBJECTIVES: This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain.
METHODS: Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables.
RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n=257) or placebo (n=284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P=0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings.
CONCLUSION: BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21945130     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  19 in total

Review 1.  Opioids for low back pain.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Michael Von Korff; David Duhrkoop
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 2.  Buprenorphine-naloxone therapy in pain management.

Authors:  Kelly Yan Chen; Lucy Chen; Jianren Mao
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Use of the low-dose buprenorphine patch: a response.

Authors:  Erica H Dankiewicz
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Treating Chronic Pain: An Overview of Clinical Studies Centered on the Buprenorphine Option.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Gavril Pasternak; Bertrand Behm
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  [Opioids in chronic low back pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].

Authors:  F Petzke; P Welsch; P Klose; R Schaefert; C Sommer; W Häuser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Incident Functional Limitations Among Community-Dwelling Adults Using Opioids: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Propensity Analysis with the Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Kevin T Pritchard; Brian Downer; Mukaila A Raji; Jacques Baillargeon; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.271

Review 7.  Chronic low back pain: a mini-review on pharmacological management and pathophysiological insights from clinical and pre-clinical data.

Authors:  Thomas S W Park; Andy Kuo; Maree T Smith
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Buprenorphine/naloxone as a promising therapeutic option for opioid abusing patients with chronic pain: reduction of pain, opioid withdrawal symptoms, and abuse liability of oral oxycodone.

Authors:  Perrine Roux; Maria A Sullivan; Julien Cohen; Lionel Fugon; Jermaine D Jones; Suzanne K Vosburg; Ziva D Cooper; Jeanne M Manubay; Shanthi Mogali; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non-cancer pain.

Authors:  Christopher Eccleston; Emma Fisher; Kyla H Thomas; Leslie Hearn; Sheena Derry; Cathy Stannard; Roger Knaggs; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-13

Review 10.  Benefit-Risk Analysis of Buprenorphine for Pain Management.

Authors:  Martin Hale; Mark Garofoli; Robert B Raffa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.