Literature DB >> 21944520

Central line-associated blood stream infection in the critically ill trauma patient.

Jason W Smith1, Michael Egger, Glen Franklin, Brian Harbrecht, J David Richardson.   

Abstract

Blood stream infections in the critically ill are a common cause of morbidity. Strict adherence to sterile technique can reduce central line-associated blood stream infections (CLBSIs) and has become a quality improvement measure. We did a retrospective review of 6,014 trauma admissions representing 10,370 catheter days. CLBSI was defined as a positive blood culture with central venous access without evidence of other infectious sources. Thirty-five CLBSIs were identified in the study period (3.26/1,000 line days). The average Injury Severity Score was 32, the average intensive care unit stay was 24 days, and the average overall length of stay was 34 days, which is higher than that of nonCLBSI patients. In 25/35 cases, there was a break in sterile technique during central venous catheter placement (71%). Of the 25 cases, 16 of them were performed in the intensive care unit (64%), five in the operating room (20%), and four in the emergency department (16%). Twenty of the 35 patients with CLBSI (57%) had a total of 24 infections, a 2-fold increase in infectious complications for a given Injury Severity Score. Seventeen (17) of the 25 "dirty" central lines (68%) were changed within 24 hours in an effort to reduce the risk of CLBSI without success. A large percentage of CLBSI can be traced to the initial placement of a central venous line under less than ideal sterile technique. Changing a line within 24 hours may not be sufficient to reduce the risk of CLBSI. Every effort should be made to adhere to proper sterile technique while placing central venous catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

Review 1.  Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegler; Daniela C Pellegrini; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Nosocomial infection in trauma intensive care.

Authors:  Jonathan Stephen Major; Jessie Welbourne
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-07-23

Review 3.  Early prevention of trauma-related infection/sepsis.

Authors:  Xiao-Yuan Ma; Li-Xing Tian; Hua-Ping Liang
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2016-11-08

4.  Retrospective Analysis of Esophageal Heat Transfer for Active Temperature Management in Post-cardiac Arrest, Refractory Fever, and Burn Patients.

Authors:  Melissa Naiman; Andrej Markota; Ahmed Hegazy; John Dingley; Erik Kulstad
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Risk Factors of Bacteremia following Multiple Traumas.

Authors:  Hak-Jae Lee; Eol Choi; Nak-Joon Choi; Hyun-Woo Sun; Jae-Suk Lee; Jeong-Woo Lee; Tae-Yoon Kim; Yoon-Joong Jung; Suk-Kyung Hong
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.112

6.  The Impact of Open versus Closed Catheter Access System of Central Venous Catheter on Infection Prevention in Critically Ill Patients: A Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Davinder Kaur; Surinder Jaspal; Sukhminderjit Singh Bajwa
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-11-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.