Literature DB >> 21944515

Regression does not predict nodal metastasis or survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Alison L Burton1, Juliana Gilbert, Russell W Farmer, Arnold J Stromberg, Lee Hagendoorn, Merrick I Ross, Robert C G Martin, Kelly M McMasters, Charles R Scoggins, Glenda G Callender.   

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the prognostic implications of regression in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Some consider regression to be an indication for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy because regression may result in underestimation of the true Breslow thickness. Other data support regression as a favorable prognostic indicator, representing immune system recognition of the primary tumor. This analysis was performed to determine whether regression predicts nodal metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), or overall survival (OS). Post hoc analysis was performed of a multicenter prospective randomized trial that included patients aged 18 to 70 years with cutaneous melanomas 1 mm or greater Breslow thickness. All patients underwent SLN biopsy; those with tumor-positive SLN underwent completion lymphadenectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival, univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis were performed. A total of 2220 patients (261 with regression; 1959 without regression) were included in this analysis with a median follow-up of 68 months. Patients with regression were more likely to be male, older than 50 years old, and have lower median Breslow thickness, superficial spreading histologic subtype, and a nonextremity anatomic location (P < 0.05 in all cases). Regression was not significantly associated with Clark level, ulceration, lymphovascular invasion, number of SLNs removed, or SLN metastasis. On multivariate analysis, factors independently predictive of DFS included Breslow thickness, ulceration, and SLN status (P < 0.05 in all cases); the same factors along with age, gender, and anatomic tumor location were significantly associated with OS (P < 0.05 in all cases). Regression was not significantly associated with DFS (risk ratio [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.27; P = 0.68) or OS (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32; P = 0.93). These data suggest that regression is not a significant prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma and should not be used to guide clinical decision-making for such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

1.  Regression in primary cutaneous melanoma: etiopathogenesis and clinical significance.

Authors:  Phyu P Aung; Priyadharsini Nagarajan; Victor G Prieto
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  Good clinical and radiological response to BRAF inhibitor in patient with metastatic thin melanoma.

Authors:  Keith Ian Quintyne; Shirley Baker; Fintan Wallis; Rajnish Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-28

3.  Is There a Relationship Between TILs and Regression in Melanoma?

Authors:  Steven Morrison; Gang Han; Faith Elenwa; John T Vetto; Graham Fowler; Stanley P Leong; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Barbara Pockaj; Heidi E Kosiorek; Jonathan S Zager; Jane L Messina; Nicola Mozzillo; Schlomo Schneebaum; Dale Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Absence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Is a Reproducible Predictive Factor for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multicenter Database Study by the Brazilian Melanoma Group.

Authors:  João Pedreira Duprat; Eduard René Brechtbülh; Bianca Costa de Sá; Mauro Enokihara; Jose Humberto Fregnani; Gilles Landman; Marcus Maia; Felice Riccardi; Francisco Alberto Belfort; Alberto Wainstein; Luciana F Moredo; Higino Steck; Miguel Brandão; Marcelo Moreno; Eduardo Miranda; Ivan Dunshee de Oliveira Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of tumor regression, solar elastosis, and patient age on pathologists' interpretation of melanocytic skin lesions.

Authors:  Linda Titus; Raymond L Barnhill; Jason P Lott; Michael W Piepkorn; David E Elder; Paul D Frederick; Heidi D Nelson; Patricia A Carney; Stevan R Knezevich; Martin A Weinstock; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Impact of the 2009 (7th edition) AJCC melanoma staging system in the classification of thin cutaneous melanomas.

Authors:  Vicki H Chu; Michael T Tetzlaff; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Victor G Prieto; Roland Bassett; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Michael S McLemore; Doina Ivan; Wei-Lien Billy Wang; Merrick I Ross; Jonathan L Curry
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.