Literature DB >> 21944119

Identification of genomic alterations associated with metastasis and cancer specific survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Jimsgene Sanjmyatav1, Kerstin Junker, Sophie Matthes, Martin Muehr, Doriana Sava, Maria Sternal, Sven Wessendorf, Markus Kreuz, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Heiko Wunderlich, Carsten Schwaenen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We identified regions of DNA copy number changes that are significantly associated with metastasis and clinical outcome in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 53 primary clear cell renal cell carcinomas, including 31 metastasized and 22 nonmetastasized tumors, by array comparative genomic hybridization with a median resolution of 1 to 1.5 Mbp. To validate copy number aberrations with potential prognostic value we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using commercially available fluorescent probes.
RESULTS: We identified 5 recurrent chromosomal aberrations that were significantly associated with metastasis, including gains of 1q21.3, 12q13.12, 12q13.3q14.1 and 20q11.21q13.2, and loss of 9p21.3p24.1. The most prominent of them with the highest OR for metastatic risk were loss of 9p21.3p24.1, and gains of 1q21.3 and 20q11.21q13.32. Eight alterations involving chromosomes 7, 9, 12, 16 and 20 significantly correlated with shortened cancer specific survival. The lowest p values on Kaplan-Meier analysis showed losses of 9p21.3p24.1 and 9q32q33.1, and gains of 7q36.3 and 20q11.21q13.32. Fluorescence in situ hybridization done in the same cohort for the 4 select regions 1q21.3, 7q36.3, 9p21.3p24.1 and 20q11.21q13.32 clearly confirmed the results of array comparative genomic hybridization.
CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that specific chromosomal alterations in clear cell renal cell carcinoma can be used to predict metastasis and cancer specific survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. It seems possible to design a combined fluorescence in situ hybridization assay based on these genetic targets for outcome prediction, which can be used for routine diagnostics.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944119     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study of histological and chromosomal characteristics between primary tumors and their corresponding metastases.

Authors:  Julien Dagher; Solène-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Frédéric Dugay; Marion Beaumont; Alexandra Lespagnol; Laurence Cornevin; Grégory Verhoest; Karim Bensalah; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Marc-Antoine Belaud-Rotureau
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  A Meta-Analysis Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Harboring Chromosome 9P Loss.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Nunno; Veronica Mollica; Matteo Brunelli; Lidia Gatto; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Matteo Santoni; Rodolfo Montironi; Anna Caliò; Albino Eccher; Michele Milella; Guido Martignoni; Eugenio Brunocilla; Francesco Massari
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Impact of recurrent copy number alterations and cancer gene mutations on the predictive accuracy of prognostic models in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A Ari Hakimi; Roy Mano; Giovanni Ciriello; Mithat Gonen; Nina Mikkilineni; John P Sfakianos; Philip H Kim; Robert J Motzer; Paul Russo; Victor E Reuter; James J Hsieh; Irina Ostrovnaya
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  [Prognostic and predictive molecular markers for urologic cancers].

Authors:  A Hartmann; T Schlomm; S Bertz; J Heinzelmann; S Hölters; R Simon; R Stoehr; K Junker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Systematic evaluation of the prognostic impact and intratumour heterogeneity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma biomarkers.

Authors:  Sakshi Gulati; Pierre Martinez; Tejal Joshi; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Claudio R Santos; Andrew J Rowan; Lisa Pickering; Martin Gore; James Larkin; Zoltan Szallasi; Paul A Bates; Charles Swanton; Marco Gerlinger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Significance of chromosome 9p status in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and quality of the reported studies.

Authors:  Ismail El-Mokadem; John Fitzpatrick; Bhavan Rai; J Cunningham; Norman Pratt; Stewart Fleming; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Downregulation of NDUFB6 due to 9p24.1-p13.3 loss is implicated in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takahiro Narimatsu; Keiko Matsuura; Chisato Nakada; Yoshiyuki Tsukamoto; Naoki Hijiya; Tomoki Kai; Toru Inoue; Tomohisa Uchida; Takeo Nomura; Fuminori Sato; Masao Seto; Ichiro Takeuchi; Hiromitsu Mimata; Masatsugu Moriyama
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Specific genomic aberrations predict survival, but low mutation rate in cancer hot spots, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Linda Köhn; Ulrika Svenson; Börje Ljungberg; Göran Roos
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2015 May-Jun

9.  Lactate dehydrogenase A is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hala Girgis; Olena Masui; Nicole Ma White; Andreas Scorilas; Fabio Rotondo; Annetta Seivwright; Manal Gabril; Emily R Filter; Andrew Ha Girgis; Georg A Bjarnason; Michael As Jewett; Andrew Evans; Sahar Al-Haddad; Kw Michael Siu; George M Yousef
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Identification of high-risk patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on interphase-FISH.

Authors:  J Sanjmyatav; S Matthes; M Muehr; D Sava; M Sternal; H Wunderlich; M Gajda; M-O Grimm; K Junker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.