Literature DB >> 21944092

Improved prediction of long-term, other cause mortality in men with prostate cancer.

Timothy J Daskivich1, Karim Chamie, Lorna Kwan, Jessica Labo, Atreya Dash, Sheldon Greenfield, Mark S Litwin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comorbidity assessment is essential to triage of care for men with prostate cancer. We identified long-term risks of other cause mortality associated with comorbidities in the Charlson index and applied these to the creation of a prostate cancer specific comorbidity index.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We sampled 1,598 cases of prostate cancer diagnosed in 1997 to 2004 at the Greater Los Angeles and Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine the risks of other cause mortality associated with comorbidities and used these hazard ratios to re-weight the Charlson index. We then compared the ability of each index to predict other cause mortality.
RESULTS: Cox modeling showed that moderate to severe liver disease, metastatic solid tumor, lymphoma and leukemia carried the highest risk (HR greater than 5) for other cause mortality, followed by moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate to severe renal disease, dementia, hemiplegia and congestive heart failure (HR 2.5 to less than 3.5). The revised and original Charlson indices performed similarly in predicting other cause mortality across all patients (c-index 0.816 vs 0.802). However, in survival analysis our revised index identified 137 men with a greater than 90% probability of other cause mortality within 10 years while the original Charlson identified only 51. In multivariate modeling the odds of 5-year other cause mortality for men with original Charlson scores 1, 2, 3 and 4+ were 2.9, 6.0, 9.2 and 29.8, respectively, compared with 3.9, 6.2, 12.8 and 84.2 for the revised index.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-weighting the Charlson index allowed for more accurate identification of men at highest risk for other cause mortality. Our revised index may be used to aid medical decision making for men with prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944092     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a Bayesian model averaging approach.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Won Kang; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Organ-confined prostate cancer: are we moving towards more or less radical surgical intervention?

Authors:  Daniel J Stevens; Naomi L Sharma; Ashutosh K Tewari; Roger Kirby; Prasanna Sooriakumaran
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Uroncor consensus statement: Management of biochemical recurrence after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer: From biochemical failure to castration resistance.

Authors:  José López Torrecilla; Asunción Hervás; Almudena Zapatero; Antonio Gómez Caamaño; Victor Macías; Ismael Herruzo; Xavier Maldonado; Alfonso Gómez Iturriaga; Francesc Casas; Carmen González San Segundo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-05-30

4.  Estimating patient health in prostate cancer treatment counseling.

Authors:  Gregory T Chesnut; Amy L Tin; Katherine A Fleshner; Nicole E Benfante; Andrew J Vickers; James A Eastham; Daniel D Sjoberg; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Mortality after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tatsuki Koyama; Kang-Hsien Fan; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; David F Penson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Validating the total illness burden index for prostate cancer (TIBI-CaP) in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: data from TRUMPET.

Authors:  Scott C Flanders; Janet Kim; Samuel Wilson; Jeffrey Braziunas; Sheldon Greenfield; John Billimek; Stanislav Lechpammer; Daniel W Lin; Lawrence Karsh; David I Quinn; Daniel Shevrin; Neal D Shore; James T Symanowski; David F Penson
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 7.  [Urological aspects in patients with liver cirrhosis].

Authors:  A Friedl; R Schwarzer; J Schneeweiss; C Brössner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  A combined index to classify prognostic comorbidity in candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Anna-Elisa Kellner; Rainer Koch; Gustavo B Baretton; Oliver W Hakenberg; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Interdisciplinary decision making in prostate cancer therapy - 5-years' time trends at the Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Center (IPC) of the Charité Berlin.

Authors:  Daniel Baumunk; Roman Reunkoff; Julien Kushner; Alexandra Baumunk; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Ursula Steiner; Steffen Weikert; Lutz Moser; Mark Schrader; Stefan Höcht; Thomas Wiegel; Kurt Miller; Martin Schostak
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Multi-modality organ-based approach to expected imaging findings, complications and recurrent tumour in the genitourinary tract after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Shawn Christopher Malone; Omran Al Dandan; Parvati Ramchandani; Evan S Siegelman
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.