AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine how expected mortality based on case-mix varies between colorectal cancer patients treated in non-teaching, teaching and university hospitals, or high, intermediate and low-volume hospitals in the Netherlands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the database of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit 2010. Factors predicting mortality after colon and rectum carcinoma resections were identified using logistic regression models. Using these models, expected mortality was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: 8580 patients treated in 90 hospitals were included in the analysis. For colon carcinoma, hospitals' expected mortality ranged from 1.5 to 14%. Average expected mortality was lower in patients treated in high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (5.0 vs. 4.3%, p < 0.05). For rectum carcinoma, hospitals expected mortality varied from 0.5 to 7.5%. Average expected mortality was higher in patients treated in non-teaching and teaching hospitals than in university hospitals (2.7 and 2.3 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, rectum carcinoma patients treated in high-volume hospitals had a higher expected mortality than patients treated in low-volume hospitals (2.6 vs. 2.2% p < 0.05). We found no differences in risk-adjusted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients are not evenly distributed between hospitals. Using the expected mortality as an integrated measure for case-mix can help to gain insight in where high-risk patients go. The large variation in expected mortality between individual hospitals, hospital types and volume groups underlines the need for risk-adjustment when comparing hospital performances.
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine how expected mortality based on case-mix varies between colorectal cancerpatients treated in non-teaching, teaching and university hospitals, or high, intermediate and low-volume hospitals in the Netherlands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the database of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit 2010. Factors predicting mortality after colon and rectum carcinoma resections were identified using logistic regression models. Using these models, expected mortality was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: 8580 patients treated in 90 hospitals were included in the analysis. For colon carcinoma, hospitals' expected mortality ranged from 1.5 to 14%. Average expected mortality was lower in patients treated in high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (5.0 vs. 4.3%, p < 0.05). For rectum carcinoma, hospitals expected mortality varied from 0.5 to 7.5%. Average expected mortality was higher in patients treated in non-teaching and teaching hospitals than in university hospitals (2.7 and 2.3 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, rectum carcinomapatients treated in high-volume hospitals had a higher expected mortality than patients treated in low-volume hospitals (2.6 vs. 2.2% p < 0.05). We found no differences in risk-adjusted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients are not evenly distributed between hospitals. Using the expected mortality as an integrated measure for case-mix can help to gain insight in where high-risk patients go. The large variation in expected mortality between individual hospitals, hospital types and volume groups underlines the need for risk-adjustment when comparing hospital performances.
Authors: David A Watters; Michael J Hollands; Russell L Gruen; Kiki Maoate; Haydn Perndt; Robert J McDougall; Wayne W Morriss; Viliami Tangi; Kathleen M Casey; Kelly A McQueen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: L J X Giesen; J W T Dekker; M Verseveld; R M P H Crolla; G P van der Schelling; C Verhoef; P B Olthof Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: A K Warps; M P M de Neree Tot Babberich; E Dekker; M W J M Wouters; J W T Dekker; R A E M Tollenaar; P J Tanis Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Geert A Simkens; Vic J Verwaal; Valery E Lemmens; Harm J Rutten; Ignace H de Hingh Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Rube van Poelgeest; Julia T van Groningen; John H Daniels; Kit C Roes; Theo Wiggers; Michel W Wouters; Guus Schrijvers Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Julia T van Groningen; Eric H Eddes; Hans F J Fabry; Marc W A van Tilburg; Ernst J van Nieuwenhoven; Yvonne Snel; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Mirre E de Noo Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Nikki E Kolfschoten; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Michel W J M Wouters; Eric-Hans Eddes; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Theo Stijnen; Job Kievit Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael P M de Neree Tot Babberich; Julia T van Groningen; Evelien Dekker; Theo Wiggers; Michel W J M Wouters; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.584