Literature DB >> 21943950

Self vs expert assessment of technical and non-technical skills in high fidelity simulation.

Sonal Arora1, Danilo Miskovic, Louise Hull, Krishna Moorthy, Rajesh Aggarwal, Helgi Johannsson, Sanjay Gautama, Roger Kneebone, Nick Sevdalis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment is imperative for learning, feedback and progression. The aim of this study was to examine whether surgeons can accurately self-assess their technical and nontechnical skills compared with expert faculty members' assessments.
METHODS: Twenty-five surgeons performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a simulated operating room. Technical and nontechnical performance was assessed by participants and faculty members using the validated Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons scale (NOTSS).
RESULTS: Assessment of technical performance correlated between self and faculty members' ratings for experienced (median score, 30.0 vs 31.0; ρ = .831; P = .001) and inexperienced (median score, 22.0 vs 28.0; ρ = .761; P = .003) surgeons. Assessment of nontechnical skills between self and faculty members did not correlate for experienced surgeons (median score, 8.0 vs 10.5; ρ = -.375; P = .229) or their more inexperienced counterparts (median score, 9.0 vs 7.0; ρ = -.018; P = .953).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons can accurately self-assess their technical skills in virtual reality LC. Conversely, formal assessment with faculty members' input is required for nontechnical skills, for which surgeons lack insight into their behaviours.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21943950     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  22 in total

Review 1.  Are general surgeons able to accurately self-assess their level of technical skills?

Authors:  C Rizan; J Ansell; T W Tilston; N Warren; J Torkington
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation.

Authors:  Shazrinizam Shaharan; Paul Neary
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

4.  Team size impact on assessment of teamwork in simulation-based trauma team training.

Authors:  Yong-Su Lim; Susan Steinemann; Benjamin W Berg
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-11

5.  Getting better all the time? Facilitating accurate team self-assessments through simulation.

Authors:  Aimee K Gardner; Kareem Abdelfattah
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 6.  Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel D A Havyer; Majken T Wingo; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Furman S McDonald; Darcy A Reed
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Self versus external assessment for technical tasks in surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Boris Zevin
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-12

8.  Role confusion and self-assessment in interprofessional trauma teams.

Authors:  Susan Steinemann; Gene Kurosawa; Alexander Wei; Nina Ho; Eunjung Lim; Gregory Suares; Ajay Bhatt; Benjamin Berg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  The effect of verbal feedback, video feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jonathan Halim; Joshua Jelley; Ningning Zhang; Marcus Ornstein; Bijendra Patel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Self-assessment of team performance using T-NOTECHS in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation is not consistent with expert assessment.

Authors:  Minna M Wieck; Cory McLaughlin; Todd P Chang; Alyssa Rake; Caron Park; Christianne Lane; Rita V Burke; L Caulette Young; Elizabeth A Cleek; Inge Morton; Catherine J Goodhue; Randall S Burd; Henri R Ford; Jeffrey S Upperman; Aaron R Jensen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.