Literature DB >> 21943754

Flow cytometric differential cell counts in milk for the evaluation of inflammatory reactions in clinically healthy and subclinically infected bovine mammary glands.

D Schwarz1, U S Diesterbeck, S König, K Brügemann, K Schlez, M Zschöck, W Wolter, C-P Czerny.   

Abstract

Somatic cell counts (SCC) are generally used as an indicator of udder health. In Germany, a cutoff value of 100,000 cells/mL is currently used to differentiate between healthy and diseased mammary glands. In addition to SCC, differential cell counts (DCC) can be applied for a more detailed evaluation of the udder health status. The aim of this study was to differentiate immune cells in milk of udder quarters classified as healthy based on SCC values of <100,000 cells/mL. Twenty cows were selected and 65 healthy udder quarters were compared with a control group of 15 diseased udder quarters (SCC>100,000 cells/mL). Cells were isolated from milk of all quarters to measure simultaneously percentages of lymphocytes, macrophages, and polymorphonuclear neutrophilic leukocytes (PMNL) by flow cytometric analysis. The bacteriological status of all 80 quarters was also determined. Differential cell count patterns of milk samples (n = 15) with extreme low SCC values of ≤ 6,250 cells/mL revealed high lymphocyte proportions of up to 88%. Milk cell populations in samples (n = 42) with SCC values from >6,250 to ≤ 25,000 cells/mL were also dominated by lymphocytes, whereas DCC patterns of 6 out of 41 milk samples with SCC values from ≥ 9,000 to ≤ 46,000 cells/mL indicated already inflammatory reactions based on the predominance of PMNL (56-75%). In 13 of 15 milk samples of the diseased udder quarters (SCC >100,000 cells/mL), PMNL were categorically found as dominant cell population with proportions of ≥ 49%. Macrophages were the second predominant cell population in almost all samples tested in relation to lymphocytes and PMNL. Further analysis of the data demonstrated significant differences of the cellular components between udder quarters infected by major pathogens (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus; n = 5) and culture-negative udder quarters (n = 56). Even the percentages of immune cells in milk from quarters infected by minor pathogens (e.g., coagulase-negative staphylococci; n = 19) differed significantly from those in milk of culture-negative quarters. Our flow cytometric analysis of immune cells in milk of udder quarters classified as healthy by SCC <100,000 cells/mL revealed inflammatory reactions based on DCC.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21943754     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  13 in total

1.  Feedback-based, system-level properties of vertebrate-microbial interactions.

Authors:  Ariel L Rivas; Mark D Jankowski; Renata Piccinini; Gabriel Leitner; Daniel Schwarz; Kevin L Anderson; Jeanne M Fair; Almira L Hoogesteijn; Wilfried Wolter; Marcelo Chaffer; Shlomo Blum; Tom Were; Stephen N Konah; Prakash Kempaiah; John M Ong'echa; Ulrike S Diesterbeck; Rachel Pilla; Claus-Peter Czerny; James B Hittner; James M Hyman; Douglas J Perkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Flow Cytometry Approach to Quantify the Viability of Milk Somatic Cell Counts after Various Physico-Chemical Treatments.

Authors:  Na Li; Romain Richoux; Marie-Hélène Perruchot; Marion Boutinaud; Jean-François Mayol; Valérie Gagnaire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of effects of Mycoplasma mastitis on milk composition in dairy cattle from South Australia.

Authors:  Abd Al-Bar Al-Farha; Farhid Hemmatzadeh; Manouchehr Khazandi; Andrew Hoare; Kiro Petrovski
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Differential Somatic Cell Count as a Novel Indicator of Milk Quality in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Giorgia Stocco; Andrea Summer; Claudio Cipolat-Gotet; Lucio Zanini; Diego Vairani; Christos Dadousis; Alfonso Zecconi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Validation of somatic cell score-associated SNPs from Holstein cattle in Sudanese Butana and Butana × Holstein crossbred cattle.

Authors:  Salma Elzaki; Paula Korkuc; Danny Arends; Monika Reissmann; Siham A Rahmatalla; Gudrun A Brockmann
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Development of an advanced flow cytometry based high-resolution immunophenotyping method to benchmark early immune response in dairy cows.

Authors:  Sabine Farschtschi; Martin Mattes; Alex Hildebrandt; Dapi Chiang; Benedikt Kirchner; Heike Kliem; Michael W Pfaffl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Correlation of hypothetical virulence traits of two Streptococcus uberis strains with the clinical manifestation of bovine mastitis.

Authors:  Riccardo Tassi; Tom N McNeilly; Anja Sipka; Ruth N Zadoks
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 8.  Role of somatic cells on dairy processes and products: a review.

Authors:  N Li; R Richoux; M Boutinaud; P Martin; V Gagnaire
Journal:  Dairy Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-17

9.  New Insights into the Significance of PARP-1 Activation: Flow Cytometric Detection of Poly(ADP-Ribose) as a Marker of Bovine Intramammary Infection.

Authors:  Giovanna De Matteis; Francesco Grandoni; Michele Zampieri; Anna Reale; Maria Carmela Scatà
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Identification of Inflammatory and Regulatory Cytokines IL-1α-, IL-4-, IL-6-, IL-12-, IL-13-, IL-17A-, TNF-α-, and IFN-γ-Producing Cells in the Milk of Dairy Cows with Subclinical and Clinical Mastitis.

Authors:  Zane Vitenberga-Verza; Māra Pilmane; Ksenija Šerstņova; Ivars Melderis; Łukasz Gontar; Maksymilian Kochański; Andżelika Drutowska; Gergely Maróti; Beatriz Prieto-Simón
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.