Susanne Quester1, Dietmar Schomburg. 1. Institute of Bioinformatics and Biochemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany. S.Quester@tu-bs.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately predict enzymatic functions is an essential prerequisite for the interpretation of cellular functions, and the reconstruction and analysis of metabolic models. Several biological databases exist that provide such information. However, in many cases these databases provide partly different and inconsistent genome annotations. DESCRIPTION: We analysed nine prokaryotic genomes and found about 70% inconsistencies in the enzyme predictions of the main annotation resources. Therefore, we implemented the annotation pipeline EnzymeDetector. This tool automatically compares and evaluates the assigned enzyme functions from the main annotation databases and supplements them with its own function prediction. This is based on a sequence similarity analysis, on manually created organism-specific enzyme information from BRENDA (Braunschweig Enzyme Database), and on sequence pattern searches. CONCLUSIONS: EnzymeDetector provides a fast and comprehensive overview of the available enzyme function annotations for a genome of interest. The web interface allows the user to work with customisable weighting schemes and cut-offs for the different prediction methods. These customised quality criteria can easily be applied, and the resulting annotation can be downloaded. The summarised view of all used annotation sources provides up-to-date information. Annotation errors that occur in only one of the databases can be recognised (because of their low relevance score). The results are stored in a database and can be accessed at http://enzymedetector.tu-bs.de.
BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately predict enzymatic functions is an essential prerequisite for the interpretation of cellular functions, and the reconstruction and analysis of metabolic models. Several biological databases exist that provide such information. However, in many cases these databases provide partly different and inconsistent genome annotations. DESCRIPTION: We analysed nine prokaryotic genomes and found about 70% inconsistencies in the enzyme predictions of the main annotation resources. Therefore, we implemented the annotation pipeline EnzymeDetector. This tool automatically compares and evaluates the assigned enzyme functions from the main annotation databases and supplements them with its own function prediction. This is based on a sequence similarity analysis, on manually created organism-specific enzyme information from BRENDA (Braunschweig Enzyme Database), and on sequence pattern searches. CONCLUSIONS: EnzymeDetector provides a fast and comprehensive overview of the available enzyme function annotations for a genome of interest. The web interface allows the user to work with customisable weighting schemes and cut-offs for the different prediction methods. These customised quality criteria can easily be applied, and the resulting annotation can be downloaded. The summarised view of all used annotation sources provides up-to-date information. Annotation errors that occur in only one of the databases can be recognised (because of their low relevance score). The results are stored in a database and can be accessed at http://enzymedetector.tu-bs.de.
Authors: Dmitrij Frishman; Martin Mokrejs; Denis Kosykh; Gabi Kastenmüller; Grigory Kolesov; Igor Zubrzycki; Christian Gruber; Birgitta Geier; Andreas Kaps; Kaj Albermann; Andreas Volz; Christian Wagner; Matthias Fellenberg; Klaus Heumann; Hans-Werner Mewes Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Mathias C Walter; Thomas Rattei; Roland Arnold; Ulrich Güldener; Martin Münsterkötter; Karamfilka Nenova; Gabi Kastenmüller; Patrick Tischler; Andreas Wölling; Andreas Volz; Norbert Pongratz; Ralf Jost; Hans-Werner Mewes; Dmitrij Frishman Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: M Louise Riley; Thorsten Schmidt; Irena I Artamonova; Christian Wagner; Andreas Volz; Klaus Heumann; Hans-Werner Mewes; Dmitrij Frishman Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2006-12-05 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Antje Chang; Ida Schomburg; Sandra Placzek; Lisa Jeske; Marcus Ulbrich; Mei Xiao; Christoph W Sensen; Dietmar Schomburg Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sabrina de Azevedo Silveira; Raquel Cardoso de Melo-Minardi; Carlos Henrique da Silveira; Marcelo Matos Santoro; Wagner Meira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.240