Literature DB >> 21943090

The calcar screw in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures--a case study.

Georg Osterhoff1, Christian Ossendorf, Guido A Wanner, Hans-Peter Simmen, Clément M Werner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With new minimally-invasive approaches for angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures, the need for the placement of oblique inferomedial screws ('calcar screw') has increasingly been discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of calcar screws on secondary loss of reduction and on the occurrence of complications.
METHODS: Patients with a proximal humeral fracture who underwent angular stable plate fixation between 01/2007 and 07/2009 were included. On AP views of the shoulder, the difference in height between humeral head and the proximal end of the plate were determined postoperatively and at follow-up. Additionally, the occurrence of complications was documented. Patients with calcar screws were assigned to group C+, patients without to group C-.
RESULTS: Follow-up was possible in 60 patients (C+ 6.7 ± 5.6 M/C- 5.0 ± 2.8 M). Humeral head necrosis occurred in 6 (C+, 15.4%) and 3 (C-, 14.3%) cases. Cut-out of the proximal screws was observed in 3 (C+, 7.7%) and 1 (C-, 4.8%) cases. In each group, 1 patient showed delayed union. Implant failure or lesions of the axillary nerve were not observed. In 44 patients, true AP and Neer views were available to measure the head-plate distance. There was a significant loss of reduction in group C- (2.56 ± 2.65 mm) compared to C+ (0.77 ± 1.44 mm; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The placement of calcar screws in the angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures is associated with less secondary loss of reduction by providing inferomedial support. An increased risk for complications could not be shown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21943090      PMCID: PMC3189144          DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  42 in total

Review 1.  Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use.

Authors:  Charles S Neer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws.

Authors:  J Seebeck; J Goldhahn; H Städele; P Messmer; M M Morlock; E Schneider
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience.

Authors:  Athanasios Koukakis; Constantinos D Apostolou; Tarun Taneja; Dimitrios S Korres; Alexander Amini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The biomechanics of locked plating for repairing proximal humerus fractures with or without medial cortical support.

Authors:  Jon Lescheid; Rad Zdero; Suraj Shah; Paul R T Kuzyk; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-11

5.  The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Yoram Weil; Joseph U Barker; Bryan T Kelly; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Patrick Platzer; Gerhild Thalhammer; Gerhard Oberleitner; Florian Kutscha-Lissberg; Thomas Wieland; Vilmos Vecsei; Christian Gaebler
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-10

Review 7.  Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 8.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Thanasas; George Kontakis; Antonios Angoules; David Limb; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  The surgical approach for locking plate osteosynthesis of displaced proximal humeral fractures influences the functional outcome.

Authors:  Pierre Hepp; Jan Theopold; Christine Voigt; Thomas Engel; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) in elderly patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ramchander Siwach; Roop Singh; Rajesh Kumar Rohilla; Virender Singh Kadian; Sukhbir Singh Sangwan; Manjeet Dhanda
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-07-16
View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparative FE biomechanical and microbial adhesion analyses on an implanted humerus.

Authors:  A Tropea; A Tisano; A Bruschetta; D Borzelli; A Migliorato; G Nirta; G Leonardi; F Trimarchi; A Alito
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

3.  The bicipital groove as a landmark for reconstruction of complex proximal humeral fractures with hybrid double plate osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Bastian Marquaß; Johannes Fakler; Hanno Steinke; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Calcar screws and adequate reduction reduced the risk of fixation failure in proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate: 190 patients followed for a mean of 3 years.

Authors:  Sjur Oppebøen; Annette K B Wikerøy; Hendrik F S Fuglesang; Filip C Dolatowski; Per-Henrik Randsborg
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Current concepts in locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Christoph J Laux; Florian Grubhofer; Clément M L Werner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Georg Osterhoff
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Comparison between minimally invasive deltoid-split and extended deltoid-split approach for proximal humeral fractures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ji-Qi Wang; Chui-Cong Lin; You-Ming Zhao; Bing-Jie Jiang; Xiao-Jing Huang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Application of Additional Medial Plate in Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures With Unstable Medial Column: A Finite Element Study and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Yu He; Jiliang He; Fu Wang; Dongsheng Zhou; Yan Wang; Bomin Wang; Shihong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Dynamic-locking-screw (DLS)-leads to less secondary screw perforations in proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Thomas Freude; Steffen Schroeter; Michael Plecko; Christian Bahrs; Frank Martetschlaeger; Tobias M Kraus; Ulrich Stoeckle; Stefan Doebele
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Is loss of fixation following locked plating of proximal humeral fractures related to the number of screws and their positions in the humeral head?

Authors:  Mohammad Maddah; Wolf C Prall; Lucas Geyer; Stefan Wirth; Wolf Mutschler; Ben Ockert
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with a locking compression plate is superior to open reduction and internal fixation in the management of the proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Tao Lin; Baojun Xiao; Xiucai Ma; Dehao Fu; Shuhua Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.