Literature DB >> 21942854

The old and new tests for celiac disease: which is the best test combination to diagnose celiac disease in pediatric patients?

Ignazio Brusca1, Antonio Carroccio, Elio Tonutti, Danilo Villalta, Renato Tozzoli, Maria Barrale, Filippo M Sarullo, Pasquale Mansueto, Stella Maria La Chiusa, Giuseppe Iacono, Nicola Bizzaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD), serum assays for anti-endomysium (EMA) and anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies have excellent diagnostic accuracy. However, these assays are less sensitive in young pediatric patients. Recently, a new ELISA test using deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) as antigen has proved to be very sensitive and specific even in pediatric patients. In addition, anti-actin IgA antibodies (AAA) is another test that can be used in CD patients because antibody concentrations correlate with the degree of villous atrophy. This study evaluated the clinical accuracy of anti-tTG, EMA, AGA, anti-DGP and AAA and the effectiveness of these in different combinations for diagnosing CD in a large cohort of pediatric patients.
METHODS: Sera of 150 children under 6 years of age were tested: 95 patients had a diagnosis of CD, while 55 patients who did not suffer from CD were used as controls. Anti-DGP IgA/IgG and AAA were assayed with ELISA kits, while anti-tTG IgA/IgG and AGA IgG/IgA were assayed using a quantitative fluoroimmunoassay. The EMA test was conducted by indirect immunofluorescence.
RESULTS: Seventy-six of 95 (80%) CD patients were positive for DGP IgA and/or tTG IgA. Eighty of 95 (84.2%) patients were positive for DGP IgG and/or tTG IgA. None of the controls were positive for these antibodies. Eighty-four of 95 (88.4%) patients and 8/55 (14.5%) controls were positive for AAA and/or anti-tTG IgA.
CONCLUSIONS: In very young children, association of anti-tTG IgA with anti-DGP IgG is the best test combination for diagnosing CD, yielding a cumulative sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 100%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21942854     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

Review 1.  Autoimmune diagnostics: the technology, the strategy and the clinical governance.

Authors:  Nicola Bizzaro; Renato Tozzoli; Danilo Villalta
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  Detection of autoantibodies against actin filaments in celiac disease.

Authors:  B Porcelli; F Ferretti; C Vindigni; C Scapellato; L Terzuoli
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Serum I-FABP Detects Gluten Responsiveness in Adult Celiac Disease Patients on a Short-Term Gluten Challenge.

Authors:  Marlou P M Adriaanse; Daniel A Leffler; Ciaran P Kelly; Detlef Schuppan; Robert M Najarian; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Wim A Buurman; Anita C E Vreugdenhil
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Intraepithelial lymphocytes, scores, mimickers and challenges in diagnosing gluten-sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease).

Authors:  Consolato Sergi; Fan Shen; Gerd Bouma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prevalence of markers of celiac disease in Colombian children with diabetes mellitus type 1.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Velasco-Benítez; Ángeles Ruíz-Extremera; Audrey Mary Matallana-Rhoades; Sandra Carolina Giraldo-Lora; Claudia Jimena Ortíz-Rivera
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2018-12-30

6.  A Canadian Study toward Changing Local Practice in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Seema Rajani; Hien Q Huynh; Leanne Shirton; Cheryl Kluthe; Donald Spady; Connie Prosser; Jon Meddings; Gwen R Rempel; Rabindranath Persad; Justine M Turner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.