Literature DB >> 21941195

Outcomes and predictors in burn rehabilitation.

Wei-Han Tan1, Richard Goldstein, Paul Gerrard, Colleen M Ryan, Paulette Niewczyk, Karen Kowalske, Ross Zafonte, Jeffrey C Schneider.   

Abstract

Advances in burn care in recent decades have resulted in a growing population of burn survivors and an increased need for inpatient rehabilitation. Burn survivors who require inpatient rehabilitation typically experience severe and complicated injuries. The purpose of this study is to examine burn rehabilitation outcomes and their predictor variables. Data are obtained from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from 2002 to 2007. Inclusion criterion is primary diagnosis of burn injury. Predictor variables include demographic, medical, and facility data. Outcome measures are length of stay efficiency, FIM® gain, community discharge, and FIM® discharge of at least 78. Linear and logistic regression analyses are used to determine significant predictors of outcomes. There are 2920 patients who meet inclusion criteria. The mean age of the population is 51 years, 33% of the population is female, 73% is Caucasian, and 40% are married. The median TBSA decile is 20 to 29%. The population exhibits a mean FIM® gain of 28 and length of stay efficiency of 2.1. A majority of the population is discharged to the community (76%) and has a FIM® discharge of at least 78 (81%). Significant predictors of outcomes in burn rehabilitation include age, FIM® admission, onset days, employment status, and marital status. Inpatient rehabilitation is critical to community reintegration of burn survivors. Survivors who are young, married, employed, and higher functioning at the time of admission to rehabilitation demonstrate the best outcomes. This research will help assess the rehabilitation potential of burn survivors and inform resource allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21941195     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318234d91a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  6 in total

1.  Validation of the Community Integration Questionnaire in the adult burn injury population.

Authors:  Paul Gerrard; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Vivian L Shie; Radha Holavanahalli; Austin Lee; Alan Jette; James A Fauerbach; Peter Esselman; David Herndon; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Guidelines for vocational evaluation following burns: integrated review of relevant process and factors.

Authors:  Mary Stergiou-Kita; Alisa Grigorovich
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

3.  The relation between satisfaction with appearance and race and ethnicity: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research burn model system study.

Authors:  Felicia Mata-Greve; Shelley A Wiechman; Kara McMullen; Kimberly Roaten; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Social Interactions and Social Activities After Burn Injury: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.

Authors:  Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Laura C Simko; Emily Dore; Mary D Slavin; Cayla Saret; Flor Amaya; J Lomelin-Gascon; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.819

5.  Predictors of functional independence, quality of life, and return to work in patients with burn injuries in mainland China.

Authors:  Dan Tang; Cecilia W P Li-Tsang; Ricky K C Au; Xia Shen; Kui-Cheng Li; Xian-Feng Yi; Lin-Rong Liao; Hai-Yan Cao; Ya-Nan Feng; Chuan-Shun Liu
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-11-04

6.  Mental health history-a contributing factor for poorer outcomes in burn survivors.

Authors:  Frank Li; Danielle Coombs
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-04-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.