Literature DB >> 21940588

Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT as a predictive biomarker of outcome in patients with head-and-neck non-squamous cell carcinoma.

Heather M Imsande1, Jessica M Davison, Minh T Truong, Anand K Devaiah, Gustavo A Mercier, Al J Ozonoff, Rathan M Subramaniam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to establish whether pretreatment (18)F-FDG uptake predicts disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in patients with head-and-neck non-squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (six women and 12 men; mean [± SD] age at diagnosis, 57.89 ± 13.54 years) with head-and-neck non-SCC were included. Tumor FDG uptake was measured by the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and was corrected for background liver FDG uptake to derive the corrected SUV(max). Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to predict the optimal corrected SUV(max) cutoffs for respective outcomes of DFS (i.e., absence of recurrence) and death.
RESULTS: The mean corrected SUV(max) of the 18 head-and-neck tumors was 5.63 ± 3.94 (range, 1.14-14.29). The optimal corrected SUV(max) cutoff for predicting DFS and overall survival was 5.79. DFS and overall survival were significantly higher among patients with corrected SUV(max) < 6 than among patients with corrected SUV(max) ≥ 6. The mean DFS for patients with corrected SUV(max) < 6 was 25.7 ± 11.14 months, and the mean DFS for patients with corrected SUV(max) ≥ 6 was 7.88 ± 7.1 months (p < 0.018). Among patients with corrected SUV(max) < 6, none died, and the mean length of follow-up for this group was 35.2 ± 9.96 months. All of the patients who died had corrected SUV(max) ≥ 6, and the overall survival for this group was 13.28 ± 12.89 months (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: FDG uptake, as measured by corrected SUV(max), may be a predictive imaging biomarker for DFS and overall survival in patients with head-and-neck non-SCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940588     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Positron emission tomography (PET) has limited utility in the staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter Einersen; Irene Epelboym; Megan D Winner; David Leung; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  FDG PET/CT imaging of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: characteristics of human papillomavirus-positive and -negative tumors.

Authors:  Abdel K Tahari; Krishna C Alluri; Harry Quon; Wayne Koch; Richard L Wahl; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.794

4.  Two-time-point FDG PET/CT: liver SULmean repeatability.

Authors:  Abdel K Tahari; Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Richard L Wahl; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Stella Lam; Nishant Agrawal; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2012-12

6.  Asphericity of pretherapeutic tumour FDG uptake provides independent prognostic value in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Ivayla Apostolova; Ingo G Steffen; Florian Wedel; Alexandr Lougovski; Simone Marnitz; Thorsten Derlin; Holger Amthauer; Ralph Buchert; Frank Hofheinz; Winfried Brenner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Liver standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass at FDG PET/CT: effect of FDG uptake time.

Authors:  Alin Chirindel; Krishna C Alluri; Abdel K Tahari; Muhammad Chaudhry; Richard L Wahl; Martin A Lodge; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Head and neck PET/CT: therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins Criteria)-interreader reliability, accuracy, and survival outcomes.

Authors:  Charles Marcus; Anthony Ciarallo; Abdel K Tahari; Esther Mena; Wayne Koch; Richard L Wahl; Ana P Kiess; Hyunseok Kang; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV.

Authors:  Arthur Varoquaux; Olivier Rager; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Karen Masterson; Pavel Dulguerov; Osman Ratib; Christoph D Becker; Minerva Becker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Superior prognostic utility of gross and metabolic tumor volume compared to standardized uptake value using PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Muhammad M Qureshi; Bhartesh A Shah; Luke T Chatburn; Scharukh Jalisi; Anand K Devaiah; Rathan M Subramaniam; Minh Tam Truong
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.