Literature DB >> 21939776

The great brain versus vein debate.

Ravi S Menon1.   

Abstract

From the earliest fMRI experiments, it was quickly appreciated by those working with BOLD at high field that the signal change originated from visible veins whose spatial localization was relatively coarse ("the macrovasculature"), and smaller vessels ("the microvasculature") that were not individually visible in BOLD images. It was expected that a functional brain imaging technique that was predominantly sensitive to the macrovasculature would not have the same effective resolution as one sensitive to the microvasculature. Elimination of the venous signal and enhancement of the microvascular one offered the tantalizing ability to image columnar and lamellar structures in the brain and distinguished fMRI from its predecessor techniques. This article reviews a brief history of how these signal sources were first identified and separated and some of the controversy associated with the "brain versus vein" debate.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939776     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

Review 1.  The physics of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Authors:  Richard B Buxton
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2013-09-04

2.  Tracking cerebral blood flow in BOLD fMRI using recursively generated regressors.

Authors:  Yunjie Tong; Blaise deB Frederick
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The impact of vascular factors on language localization in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional Parcellation of the Speech Production Cortex.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Matthias Heyne; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel A Handwerker; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Mark D'Esposito; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The resting-state fMRI arterial signal predicts differential blood transit time through the brain.

Authors:  Yunjie Tong; Jinxia Fiona Yao; J Jean Chen; Blaise deB Frederick
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 7.  One cranium, two brains not yet introduced: Distinct but complementary views of the social brain.

Authors:  George S Prounis; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  An investigation of positive and inverted hemodynamic response functions across multiple visual areas.

Authors:  Alexander M Puckett; Jedidiah R Mathis; Edgar A DeYoe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  BOLD fractional contribution to resting-state functional connectivity above 0.1 Hz.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Methods and Considerations for Dynamic Analysis of Functional MR Imaging Data.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Mikail Rubinov; Catie Chang
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.