Literature DB >> 21939775

Microstructure of a three-way anatomical network predicts individual differences in response inhibition: a tractography study.

Andrea V King1, Julia Linke, Achim Gass, Michael G Hennerici, Heike Tost, Cyril Poupon, Michèle Wessa.   

Abstract

Response inhibition is thought to depend critically on the inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis (IFGoper), presupplementary motor area (preSMA) and basal ganglia, including the subthalamic nucleus (STN), but the differential contribution of structural connections within this network to response inhibition remains unclear. Using diffusion tensor imaging and probabilistic fiber tractography, we investigated the relative associations between local white matter microstructure and stop-signal response inhibition in fronto-basal ganglia tracts delineated by probabilistic tractography. In a tract-of-interest approach, we identify significant associations with fractional anisotropy (FA) in fibers connecting the right STN region to both preSMA/SMA and IFGoper and in bilateral tracts connecting preSMA/SMA to IFGoper and the striatum. In addition, significant associations with radial diffusivity (RD) were found in fibers connecting the right preSMA/SMA to striatum and in bilateral tracts between IFGoper and STN region. In our whole-brain analysis, additional significant clusters were identified in the corpus callosum, optic radiation, inferior fronto-occipital tract and white matter of the precentral gyrus. To investigate the relative importance of regional white matter characteristics to response inhibition performance, we performed a step-wise multiple regression analysis that yielded FA in tracts connecting preSMA/SMA to the STN region and striatum, respectively, and RD in fibers connecting IFGoper to the STN region as best predictors of response inhibition performance (42% explained variance). These findings point to a specific contribution of white matter pathways connecting distinct basal ganglia structures with both medial frontal and ventrolateral prefrontal regions to response inhibition.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939775     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Aging and inhibitory control of action: cortico-subthalamic connection strength predicts stopping performance.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Benjamin Xu; Rita Volochayev; Oluwole Awosika; Wen-Tung Wang; John A Butman; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and caudate pathway: New evidence for cue-induced craving of smokers.

Authors:  Kai Yuan; Dahua Yu; Yanzhi Bi; Ruonan Wang; Min Li; Yajuan Zhang; Minghao Dong; Jinquan Zhai; Yangding Li; Xiaoqi Lu; Jie Tian
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Speed of saccade execution and inhibition associated with fractional anisotropy in distinct fronto-frontal and fronto-striatal white matter pathways.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Fiona M Z van den Heiligenberg; R S Kahn; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Stopping speech suppresses the task-irrelevant hand.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Sensorimotor-independent prefrontal activity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Christopher J Cannistraci; John C Gore; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Deficits in inferior frontal cortex activation in euthymic bipolar disorder patients during a response inhibition task.

Authors:  Jennifer D Townsend; Susan Y Bookheimer; Lara C Foland-Ross; Teena D Moody; Naomi I Eisenberger; Jeffrey S Fischer; Mark S Cohen; Catherine A Sugar; Lori L Altshuler
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.744

9.  PreSMA stimulation changes task-free functional connectivity in the fronto-basal-ganglia that correlates with response inhibition efficiency.

Authors:  Benjamin Xu; Marco Sandrini; Wen-Tung Wang; Jason F Smith; Joelle E Sarlls; Oluwole Awosika; John A Butman; Barry Horwitz; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Proactive selective response suppression is implemented via the basal ganglia.

Authors:  D S Adnan Majid; Weidong Cai; Jody Corey-Bloom; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.