Literature DB >> 21939062

Do birds and beetles show similar responses to urbanization?

Sara A Gagné1, Lenore Fahrig.   

Abstract

To date, the vast majority of studies in urban areas have been carried out on birds, yet it is not known whether the responses of birds to urbanization are congruent with those of other taxa. In this paper, we compared the responses of breeding birds and carabid beetles to urbanization, specifically asking whether the emerging generalizations of the effects of extreme levels of urbanization on birds (declines in total species richness and the richness of specialist species, increases in total abundance and the abundances of native generalist and introduced species, and community simplification, including increasing similarity) could also be applied to ground beetles. We also directly tested for congruence between birds and ground beetles using correlations between variables describing bird and beetle community structure and correlations between bird and beetle distance matrices describing community dissimilarity between pairs of sampling locations. Breeding bird and carabid beetle community data were collected in Ottawa, Ontario, and Gatineau, Quebec, Canada, in two groups of sites: developed sites representing the predictor variable within-site housing density, and forested sites adjacent to development representing the predictor variable neighboring housing density (each site was 0.25 km2). Breeding birds and carabid beetles do not respond similarly to increasing within-site housing density but do exhibit some similar responses to increasing neighboring housing density. Birds displayed strong declines in diversity, compositional changes, and community simplification in response to increasing within-site housing density. Forest and introduced species of birds and beetles responded similarly to increasing housing density within a site, but responses of overall diversity and open-habitat species richness and patterns of community simplification differed between birds and beetles. Increasing neighboring housing density resulted in increases in the abundances of introduced birds and introduced beetles and similar patterns of community simplification in both taxa. To better understand and mitigate the effects of urbanization on biodiversity, we suggest that, in addition to the responses of birds, future research should focus on the responses of other taxa in the urban matrix.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939062     DOI: 10.1890/09-1905.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Bird Richness and Abundance in Response to Urban Form in a Latin American City: Valdivia, Chile as a Case Study.

Authors:  Carmen Paz Silva; Cristóbal E García; Sergio A Estay; Olga Barbosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A global model of the response of tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic pressures.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Helen R P Phillips; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Abigayil Blandon; Stuart H M Butchart; Hollie L Booth; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Michelle L K Harrison; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Edwin Pynegar; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Relative Contribution of Matrix Structure, Patch Resources and Management to the Local Densities of Two Large Blue Butterfly Species.

Authors:  Joanna Kajzer-Bonk; Piotr Skórka; Piotr Nowicki; Maciej Bonk; Wiesław Król; Damian Szpiłyk; Michal Woyciechowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Avian preference for close proximity to human habitation and its ecological consequences.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 5.  Citizen Science and the Urban Ecology of Birds and Butterflies - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James Wang Wei; Benjamin P Y-H Lee; Low Bing Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.