Literature DB >> 21938639

Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way.

Gerald Jurasinski1, Marian Koch.   

Abstract

A consistent terminology for species diversity is subject of an ongoing debate. Recently Tuomisto (Oecologia 164:853-860, 2010) stated that a consistent terminology for diversity already exists. The paper comments on recent papers by ourselves (Jurasinski et al. Oecologia 159:15-26, 2009) and by Moreno and Rodriguez (Oecologia 163:279-282, 2010). Both started from Whittaker's diversity concept to discuss the ambiguities of the terminology and propose a new, more consistent terminology that is based on the different approaches to diversity analysis. In contrast, Tuomisto adheres to a strict school of thinking and derives a diversity framework in the sense of Whittaker (alpha, beta, gamma) from the conceptual definition of diversity itself. A third group of papers discusses appropriate methods for the analysis of the variation in species composition. Here, we support the idea that alpha, beta and gamma diversity should be used in a strict sense that is based only on the conceptual definition of diversity. We accordingly extend and modify our terminological concept for species diversity. All approaches to the analysis and quantification of species composition and diversity can be assigned to three abstraction levels (species composition, variation in species composition,and variation in variation in species composition) and two scale levels (sample scale, aggregation scale). All methods that investigate the variation in species composition across scale levels evaluate beta relation with beta diversity being just one form of beta relation, which is calculated by dividing gamma diversity of order q by the appropriate alpha diversity of the same order. In contrast, differentiation refers to a pairwise calculation of resemblance in species composition. It is restricted to sample scale and is therefore most often only an intermediate step of analysis. Many ecological questions can be addressed either by direct analysis of the variation in species composition using raw data approaches or by further analysis of differentiation datasets on aggregation scale with or without respect to an external gradient.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938639     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2126-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Independence of alpha and beta diversities.

Authors:  Lou Jost
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist.

Authors:  Hanna Tuomisto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist.

Authors:  Marti J Anderson; Thomas O Crist; Jonathan M Chase; Mark Vellend; Brian D Inouye; Amy L Freestone; Nathan J Sanders; Howard V Cornell; Liza S Comita; Kendi F Davies; Susan P Harrison; Nathan J B Kraft; James C Stegen; Nathan G Swenson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis.

Authors:  Hanna Tuomisto; Kalle Ruokolainen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  A multiple-site similarity measure.

Authors:  Ola H Diserud; Frode Odegaard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  A two-stage probabilistic approach to multiple-community similarity indices.

Authors:  Anne Chao; Lou Jost; S C Chiang; Y-H Jiang; Robin L Chazdon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity.

Authors:  Gerald Jurasinski; Vroni Retzer; Carl Beierkuhnlein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity?

Authors:  Claudia E Moreno; Pilar Rodríguez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Measures of ecological association.

Authors:  Svante Janson; Jan Vegelius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Diversity indices: which ones are admissible?

Authors:  R D Routledge
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biodiversity patterns along ecological gradients: unifying β-diversity indices.

Authors:  Robert C Szava-Kovats; Meelis Pärtel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Classifying measures of biological variation.

Authors:  Hans-Rolf Gregorius; Elizabeth M Gillet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  On the Use of Diversity Measures in Longitudinal Sequencing Studies of Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Brandie D Wagner; Gary K Grunwald; Gary O Zerbe; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Charles E Robertson; Edith T Zemanick; J Kirk Harris
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Exploring the taxonomic composition of two fungal communities on the Swedish west coast through metabarcoding.

Authors:  Alice Retter; R Henrik Nilsson; Sarah J Bourlat
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-09-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.