PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of erlotinib in cancer patients with moderate hepatic impairment (MHI) to those of cancer patients with adequate hepatic function (AHF). METHODS: Cancer patients with either AHF or MHI were treated with a single 150 mg dose of erlotinib on day 1 only followed by 96 h of plasma sampling for PK assessment. From day 5, patients were allowed to continue daily erlotinib in a maintenance phase. Non-smoking patients were stratified into an AHF cohort (total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN] and ALT/AST ≤ 1.5 X ULN) or a MHI cohort (Child-Pugh score of 7-9). The frequency of adverse events and laboratory changes were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, 21 with AHF and 15 with MHI, received at least one dose of erlotinib. The PK of erlotinib was similar between the two cohorts with a median C (max) of 1.09 versus 0.828 μg/mL and corresponding median AUC(0-t ) 29.3 versus 30.5 μg h/mL for the AHF and MHI cohorts, respectively. Adverse events from erlotinib in cancer patients with MHI were consistent with the known safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: The PK and safety profiles of erlotinib in patients with MHI were similar to those with AHF. As a result, a reduced starting dose of erlotinib in patients with MHI is not required and treatment should be guided by patients' tolerability.
PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of erlotinib in cancerpatients with moderate hepatic impairment (MHI) to those of cancerpatients with adequate hepatic function (AHF). METHODS:Cancerpatients with either AHF or MHI were treated with a single 150 mg dose of erlotinib on day 1 only followed by 96 h of plasma sampling for PK assessment. From day 5, patients were allowed to continue daily erlotinib in a maintenance phase. Non-smoking patients were stratified into an AHF cohort (total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN] and ALT/AST ≤ 1.5 X ULN) or a MHI cohort (Child-Pugh score of 7-9). The frequency of adverse events and laboratory changes were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, 21 with AHF and 15 with MHI, received at least one dose of erlotinib. The PK of erlotinib was similar between the two cohorts with a median C (max) of 1.09 versus 0.828 μg/mL and corresponding median AUC(0-t ) 29.3 versus 30.5 μg h/mL for the AHF and MHI cohorts, respectively. Adverse events from erlotinib in cancerpatients with MHI were consistent with the known safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: The PK and safety profiles of erlotinib in patients with MHI were similar to those with AHF. As a result, a reduced starting dose of erlotinib in patients with MHI is not required and treatment should be guided by patients' tolerability.
Authors: Nagdeep Giri; Joanna C Masters; Anna Plotka; Yali Liang; Tanya Boutros; Patricia Pardo; Joseph O'Connell; Carlo Bello Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Joseph Piscitelli; Joseph Chen; Robert R LaBadie; Joanne Salageanu; Chin-Hee Chung; Weiwei Tan Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Eduardo Castañón; Christian Rolfo; David Viñal; Inés López; Juan P Fusco; Marta Santisteban; Patricia Martin; Leire Zubiri; José I Echeveste; Ignacio Gil-Bazo Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Andrea Gruber; Martin Czejka; Philipp Buchner; Marie Kitzmueller; Nairi Kirchbaumer Baroian; Christian Dittrich; Azra Sahmanovic Hrgovcic Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 3.333