Literature DB >> 21938545

An open-label study to describe pharmacokinetic parameters of erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with adequate and moderately impaired hepatic function.

Cindy L O'Bryant1, Paul Haluska, Lee Rosen, Ramesh K Ramanathan, Balaji Venugopal, Stephen Leong, Ramesh Boinpally, Amy Franke, Karsten Witt, Jeffry Evans, Chandra Belani, S Gail Eckhardt, Suresh Ramalingam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of erlotinib in cancer patients with moderate hepatic impairment (MHI) to those of cancer patients with adequate hepatic function (AHF).
METHODS: Cancer patients with either AHF or MHI were treated with a single 150 mg dose of erlotinib on day 1 only followed by 96 h of plasma sampling for PK assessment. From day 5, patients were allowed to continue daily erlotinib in a maintenance phase. Non-smoking patients were stratified into an AHF cohort (total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN] and ALT/AST ≤ 1.5 X ULN) or a MHI cohort (Child-Pugh score of 7-9). The frequency of adverse events and laboratory changes were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, 21 with AHF and 15 with MHI, received at least one dose of erlotinib. The PK of erlotinib was similar between the two cohorts with a median C (max) of 1.09 versus 0.828 μg/mL and corresponding median AUC(0-t ) 29.3 versus 30.5 μg h/mL for the AHF and MHI cohorts, respectively. Adverse events from erlotinib in cancer patients with MHI were consistent with the known safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS: The PK and safety profiles of erlotinib in patients with MHI were similar to those with AHF. As a result, a reduced starting dose of erlotinib in patients with MHI is not required and treatment should be guided by patients' tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938545     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1733-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  6 in total

1.  Investigation of the impact of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dacomitinib.

Authors:  Nagdeep Giri; Joanna C Masters; Anna Plotka; Yali Liang; Tanya Boutros; Patricia Pardo; Joseph O'Connell; Carlo Bello
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Hepatotoxicity Secondary to Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alla Grigorian; Christopher B O'Brien
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 3.  Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management.

Authors:  Matthias Pinter; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Wolfgang Sieghart
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-03-17

4.  The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Dacomitinib.

Authors:  Joseph Piscitelli; Joseph Chen; Robert R LaBadie; Joanne Salageanu; Chin-Hee Chung; Weiwei Tan
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations and their targeted treatment in the prognosis of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring liver metastasis.

Authors:  Eduardo Castañón; Christian Rolfo; David Viñal; Inés López; Juan P Fusco; Marta Santisteban; Patricia Martin; Leire Zubiri; José I Echeveste; Ignacio Gil-Bazo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Monitoring of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients during long-time administration and comparison to a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Andrea Gruber; Martin Czejka; Philipp Buchner; Marie Kitzmueller; Nairi Kirchbaumer Baroian; Christian Dittrich; Azra Sahmanovic Hrgovcic
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.