BACKGROUND: The US FDA has been collecting information on medical devices involved in significant adverse advents since 1984. These reports have been used by researchers to advise clinicians on potential risks and complications of using these devices. OBJECTIVE: Research adverse events related to the use of Clinical Information Systems (CIS) as reported in FDA databases. METHODS: Three large, national, adverse event medical device databases were examined for reports pertaining to CIS. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty unique reports (from over 1.4 million reports) were found, representing 32 manufacturers. The manifestations of these adverse events included: missing or incorrect data, data displayed for the wrong patient, chaos during system downtime and system unavailable for use. Analysis of these reports illustrated events associated with system design, implementation, use, and support. CONCLUSION: The identified causes can be used by manufacturers to improve their products and by clinical facilities and providers to adjust their workflow and implementation processes appropriately. The small number of reports found indicates a need to raise awareness regarding publicly available tools for documenting problems with CIS and for additional reporting and dialog between manufacturers, organizations, and users.
BACKGROUND: The US FDA has been collecting information on medical devices involved in significant adverse advents since 1984. These reports have been used by researchers to advise clinicians on potential risks and complications of using these devices. OBJECTIVE: Research adverse events related to the use of Clinical Information Systems (CIS) as reported in FDA databases. METHODS: Three large, national, adverse event medical device databases were examined for reports pertaining to CIS. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty unique reports (from over 1.4 million reports) were found, representing 32 manufacturers. The manifestations of these adverse events included: missing or incorrect data, data displayed for the wrong patient, chaos during system downtime and system unavailable for use. Analysis of these reports illustrated events associated with system design, implementation, use, and support. CONCLUSION: The identified causes can be used by manufacturers to improve their products and by clinical facilities and providers to adjust their workflow and implementation processes appropriately. The small number of reports found indicates a need to raise awareness regarding publicly available tools for documenting problems with CIS and for additional reporting and dialog between manufacturers, organizations, and users.
Authors: Jeffrey A Linder; Jennifer S Haas; Aarthi Iyer; Michael A Labuzetta; Michael Ibara; Michael Celeste; George Getty; David W Bates Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Yong Y Han; Joseph A Carcillo; Shekhar T Venkataraman; Robert S B Clark; R Scott Watson; Trung C Nguyen; Hülya Bayir; Richard A Orr Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dean F Sittig; Adam Wright; Enrico Coiera; Farah Magrabi; Raj Ratwani; David W Bates; Hardeep Singh Journal: Health Informatics J Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michael J Connor; Deborah C Marshall; Vitali Moiseenko; Kevin Moore; Laura Cervino; Todd Atwood; Parag Sanghvi; Arno J Mundt; Todd Pawlicki; Abram Recht; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Derek W Meeks; Amirhossein Takian; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh; Nick Barber Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 4.497