Literature DB >> 21938195

Laparoscopic colonic resection for rectosigmoid colonic tumours: a retrospective analysis and comparison with open resection.

Kurumboor Prakash1, Deepak Varma, Mahendra Rajan, Naduthottam Palanisamy Kamlesh, Prakash Zacharias, Ramesh Ganesh Narayanan, Mathew Philip.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic approach for treatment of colorectal malignancy is gaining acceptance gradually; however the benefits of laparoscopic surgery in colonic and rectal tumours is still open to debate. This study aims at a retrospective analysis of operative and short term outcome of patients with rectosigmoid tumours. A retrospective analysis of operative, postoperative and short-term outcome of 62 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer of rectosigmoid region were compared with a same number of parameters-matched patients who underwent open colorectal resection. Blood transfusion requirement was significantly more in the open group compared to the laparoscopy group (38.7% versus 6.4%, p = 0.001). ICU stay was less in the laparoscopy group (p = <0.05) and they were started on oral liquid diet earlier (p = 0.013). The number of the lymph nodes retrieved, positive distal margin and radial involvement were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopy group (8.4 versus 13.8 days, p < 0.05). Radical operation for rectosigmoid tumors is technically feasible with laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic approach is associated with less blood loss, transfusion and significantly less ICU stay. Laparoscopic group recovers early and needs less hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonic resection; Colorectal malignancy; Laparoscopic surgery; Rectosigmoid

Year:  2010        PMID: 21938195      PMCID: PMC3002773          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-010-0119-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  17 in total

Review 1.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Vittorio Civelli; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications.

Authors:  P R Shah; A Joseph; P N Haray
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: An Update (with Special Reference to Indian Scenario).

Authors:  G S Moirangthem
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and benefits octogenarian patients with malignant disease: a matched case-control study comparing laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Jiayi Wong; Jarrod K Tan; Ker-Kan Tan; Wai-Kit Cheong; Bettina Lieske
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A Study of 101 Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries: a Single Surgeon Experience. How Important Is the Learning Curve?

Authors:  Anil Heroor; Ghanishkumar Panjwani; Rahul Chaskar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  Kurumboor Prakash; N P Kamalesh; K Pramil; I S Vipin; A Sylesh; Manoj Jacob
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal cancers in India: Treatment perspective.

Authors:  Nikhil Suresh Ghadyalpatil; Chopra Supriya; Patil Prachi; Dsouza Ashwin; Saklani Avanish
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Sexual and urinary dysfunction following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in male patients: A prospective study.

Authors:  Deepak George; Kaniyarakkal Pramil; Naduthottam P Kamalesh; Shaji Ponnambatheyil; Prakash Kurumboor
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.