Literature DB >> 21937770

Dosimetric consequences of tumour motion due to respiration for a scanned proton beam.

K M Kraus1, E Heath, U Oelfke.   

Abstract

A method for simulating spot-scanned delivery to a moving tumour was developed which uses patient-specific image and plan data. The magnitude of interplay effects was investigated for two patient cases under different fractionation and respiratory motion variation scenarios. The use of volumetric rescanning for motion mitigation was also investigated. For different beam arrangements, interplay effects lead to severely distorted dose distributions for a single fraction delivery. Baseline shift variations for single fraction delivery reduced the dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) by up to 14.1 Gy. Fractionated delivery significantly reduced interplay effects; however, local overdosage of 12.3% compared to the statically delivered dose remained for breathing period variations. Variations of the tumour baseline position and respiratory period were found to have the largest influence on target inhomogeneity; these effects were reduced with fractionation. Volumetric rescanning improved the dose homogeneity. For the CTV, underdosage was improved by up to 34% in the CTV and overdosage to the lung was reduced by 6%. Our results confirm that rescanning potentially increases the dose homogeneity; however, it might not sufficiently compensate motion-induced dose distortions. Other motion mitigation techniques may be required to additionally treat lung tumours with scanned proton beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21937770     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/20/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

1.  Computing proton dose to irregularly moving targets.

Authors:  Justin Phillips; Gueorgui Gueorguiev; James A Shackleford; Clemens Grassberger; Stephen Dowdell; Harald Paganetti; Gregory C Sharp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Laleh Kardar; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Wenhua Cao; Joe Y Chang; Li Liao; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Gino Lim; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Reducing Dose Uncertainty for Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy of Moving Tumors by Optimizing the Spot Delivery Sequence.

Authors:  Heng Li; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Laleh Kardar; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Wenhua Cao; Joe Y Chang; Li Liao; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Gino Lim; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12

5.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Yu-Hui Chang; Zhifei Wen; Jiajian Shen; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael G Herman; Carlos Vargas; Sameer Keole; William Wong; Martin Bues
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Dynamically accumulated dose and 4D accumulated dose for moving tumors.

Authors:  Heng Li; Yupeng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoqiang Li; Wei Liu; Michael T Gillin; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Considerations when treating lung cancer with passive scatter or active scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Sara St James; Clemens Grassberger; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

8.  Four-dimensional Monte Carlo simulations demonstrating how the extent of intensity-modulation impacts motion effects in proton therapy lung treatments.

Authors:  Stephen Dowdell; Clemens Grassberger; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chenbin Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Shawn Korte; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Yixiu Kang; Sameer R Keole; Terence T Sio; William W Wong; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yunze Yang; Steven E Schild; Thomas B Daniels; William W Wong; Mirek Fatyga; Martin Bues; Terence T Sio; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.