Literature DB >> 21937705

A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer.

A G Pallis1, I Boukovinas1, A Ardavanis1, I Varthalitis1, N Malamos1, V Georgoulias1, D Mavroudis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Breast Cancer Study Group of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group conducted a phase III trial of single-agent capecitabine versus the vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of combination treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine (Cap arm: 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, on days 1-14) or vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet (VG arm: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2); both drugs on days 1 and 15).
RESULTS: Seventy-four women were treated on each arm and median PFS was 5.4 versus 5.2 months (P = 0.736), for VG and Cap, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.4 months for the VG arm and 22.4 months for the Cap arm (P = 0.319). Overall response rate was 28.4% in the VG arm and 24.3% in the Cap arm (P = 0.576). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Neutropenia and fatigue were more common with VG arm and hand-foot syndrome with Cap arm.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet over single-agent capecitabine in terms of PFS. Given the favorable toxicity and convenience of oral administration, single-agent capecitabine is recommended for compliant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21937705     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  18 in total

1.  Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine (GemVin) Regimen.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Shang; Dominic A Solimando; J Aubrey Waddell
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  A comparison of toxicity profiles between the lower and standard dose capecitabine in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomohiro F Nishijima; Maya Suzuki; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer - An Anachronism in the Era of Personalised and Targeted Oncological Therapy?

Authors:  A Schneeweiss; E Ruckhäberle; J Huober
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  Therapy Algorithms for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early and Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Schneeweiss; Ingo Bauerfeind; Tanja Fehm; Wolfgang Janni; Christoph Thomssen; Isabell Witzel; Achim Wöckel; Volkmar Müller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Lin28 mediates paclitaxel resistance by modulating p21, Rb and Let-7a miRNA in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Kezhen Lv; Liqun Liu; Linbo Wang; Jiren Yu; Xiaojiao Liu; Yongxia Cheng; Minjun Dong; Rongyue Teng; Linjiao Wu; Peifen Fu; Wuguo Deng; Wenxian Hu; Lisong Teng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

7.  Genomic alterations in DNA repair and chromatin remodeling genes in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with exceptional responses to capecitabine.

Authors:  Maren K Levin; Kai Wang; Roman Yelensky; Ying Cao; Corinne Ramos; Nicholas Hoke; John Pippen; Joanne L Blum; Barry Brooks; Gary Palmer; Norma Palma; Sohail Balasubramanian; Jeffrey S Ross; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Outcome of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant trastuzumab in the Finland Capecitabine Trial (FinXX).

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Riikka Huovinen; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Minna Tanner; Riitta Kokko; Johan Ahlgren; Päivi Auvinen; Outi Saarni; Leena Helle; Kenneth Villman; Paul Nyandoto; Greger Nilsson; Mika Leinonen; Vesa Kataja; Petri Bono; Henrik Lindman
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Comparison of the effectiveness and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens, capecitabine/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide vs 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, followed by adjuvant, capecitabine/docetaxel vs docetaxel, in patients with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Minmin Zhang; Wei Wei; Jianlun Liu; Huawei Yang; Yi Jiang; Wei Tang; Qiuyun Li; Xiaoming Liao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Phase I and II Study of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Pamela Abdayem; Marwan Ghosn; Vicente Valero; Ronald Walters; Banu Arun; James L Murray; Richard Theriault; Debbie Frye; Nuhad K Ibrahim
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.