Literature DB >> 21936929

Characterization of large genomic deletions in the FBN1 gene using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Larissa V Furtado1, Whitney Wooderchak-Donahue, Alan F Rope, Angela T Yetman, Tracey Lewis, Parker Plant, Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Connective tissue diseases characterized by aortic aneurysm, such as Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome and Ehlers Danlos syndrome type IV are heterogeneous and despite overlapping phenotypes, the natural history, clinical manifestations and interventional course for each diagnosis can be quite unique. The majority of mutations involved in the etiology of these disorders are missense and nonsense mutations. However, large deletions and duplications undetected by sequencing may be implicated in their pathogenesis, and may explain the apparent lack of genotype-phenotype correlation in a subset of patients. The objective of this study was to search for large pathogenic deletions and/or duplications in the FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes using multiplex-ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in patients with aortopathy, in whom no mutations in the FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes were identified by sequencing.
METHODS: The study included 14 patients from 11 unrelated families with aortic aneurysm. Of those, six patients (including 3 first-degree relatives), fulfilled the revised Ghent criteria for Marfan syndrome, and eight had predominantly aortic aneurysm/dilatation with variable skeletal and craniofacial involvement. MLPA for FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 was carried out in all patients. A 385 K chromosome 15 specific array was used in two patients with a deletion of the entire FBN1 in order to define its size and boundaries.
RESULTS: We identified two novel large deletions in the FBN1 gene in four patients of two unrelated families who met clinical diagnostic criteria for Marfan syndrome. One patient was found to have a FBN1 deletion encompassing exons 1-5. The other three patients had a 542 Kb deletion spanning the whole FBN1 gene and five additional genes (SLC24A5, MYEF2, CTXN2, SLC12A1, DUT) in the chromosome 15.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings expand the number of large FBN1 deletions, and emphasize the importance of screening for large genomic deletions in connective tissue disorders featuring aortopathies, especially for those with classic Marfan phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21936929      PMCID: PMC3196690          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genet        ISSN: 1471-2350            Impact factor:   2.103


Background

Thoracic aortic aneurysm with dissection is the most common fatal condition involving the aorta [1], and can be syndromic, familial nonsyndromic or sporadic. Mutations in genes related to the structure and function of the aortic wall, such as MYH11 on chromosome 16p12.2-13.3 [2,3], ACTA2 on chromosome 10q23-24 [4], SLC2A10 on chromosome 20q13.1 [5], NOTCH1 on chromosome 9q34-35 [6], TGFβR1 on chromosome 9q33-34 [7], and TGFβR2 genes on chromosome 3p24-25 [8] have been linked to non-syndromic familial forms of thoracic aortic aneurysm [reviewed in 9]. Syndromic connective tissue diseases featuring aortic aneurysm and dissection comprise a heterogeneous group of genetic diseases, including Marfan syndrome (MFS; OMIM # 154700), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS; OMIM # 609192), Ehlers Danlos syndrome type IV (EDS IV; OMIM # 130050), and familial thoracic aneurysm syndrome (TAAD; OMIM# 132900). Recently, a new syndrome presenting with aneurysms, dissections and tortuosity throughout the arterial tree and mild craniofacial features, early-onset osteoarthritis and skeletal and cutaneous anomalies was described to be associated with mutations in the SMAD3 [10]. These conditions have broad spectrum of phenotypic expression and overlapping phenotype, although their natural history and interventional course can be quite unique. Making the timely and correct diagnosis in individuals with connective tissue disorders with aortopathy is crucial to obtaining appropriate surveillance and interventions aimed at preventing the significant morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases. In this setting, molecular testing is a valuable adjunct to clinical assessment, especially in cases with non-classical phenotypes. The majority of syndromic connective tissue featuring aortopathy are caused by missense, nonsense or splice site mutations [11]. A few reports of large genomic deletions involving single and multiple exons of the FBN1 gene [12-17] as well as whole-FBN1 deletions [18-22] are available, although no large FBN1 duplications have been reported to date. Because of that, full gene sequencing is commonly the initial approach for the diagnosis of these patients. However, sequencing does not detect large exonic deletions or duplications unless quantitative methods are applied, which allegedly could explain the lack of genotype-phenotype correlation in some patients. This study was undertaken to search for large pathogenic deletions and/or duplications in the FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes using multiplex-ligation probe amplification (MLPA) in 14 patients with clinical diagnosis of aortopathy in whom no mutations in the FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes were identified by sequencing.

Methods

Subjects

Informed consent was obtained from patients and relatives using University of Utah and Primary Children's Medical Center Institutional Review Board-approved protocols. The study included 14 patients [10 males, 4 females; mean age: 21 years (age range: 2- 43 years)] from 11 unrelated families, who had clinical diagnosis of aortic dilatation, aneurysm or aortic dissection and negative molecular analysis of the FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes by sequencing. In families with more than one affected individual, the result from mutational analysis was extrapolated to untested relatives. Of those, 6 patients (including 3 first-degree relatives), fulfilled the revised Ghent criteria for diagnosis of Marfan syndrome [23], and 8 had predominantly aortic aneurysm or dilatation with variable skeletal and craniofacial involvement (Table 1). Data on the clinical phenotypes of patients were collected from medical records and during physical examinations during their visit to the Medical Genetics and Cardiology clinics at Primary Children's Medical Center.
Table 1

Summary of clinical profile of patients

12*3*4*5671011121314
GenderMFMMMFMMFMFMMM

Age (years)274215124219123021525181427

Aortic
 Root dilatation (Z ≥ 2)+++++++++/-+-+++
 Ao root surgery-+--+---------
 Aneurysm-+-------++---
 Dissection----+---
 Tortuosity+-------

Cardiac
 Mitral valve prolapse+----+-----+-+
 Valve (other)++++-+-+---+--
 Cardiac (other)--------+-+---

Ophthalmologic
 Ectopia lentis--+-----------

Skeletal
 Pectus carinatum++--++---+----
 Pectus excavatum++++--+------+
 Reduced US/LS++++++-------+
 Increased arm/height----+++-------
 Scoliosis----+----+----
 Thoracolumbar kyphosis---+--------++
 Protrusio acetabuli------+--+----
 Pes planus--------------
 Hindfoot deformity+-++-+------++
 ↓ elbow extension+-----
 Wrist/thumb signs
 Dural ectasia

Craniofacial
 Hypertelorism---+---+------
 Bifid/broad uvula-------+------
 Palate anomaly-+-+---+------
 Microretrognathia+------+---+--
 Dolicocephalia--------------
 Craniosynostosis--------------
 Other------------

Skin
 Striae+-+-++-------+
 Thin and velvety skin-------------
 Easy bruising---------+-

Family History+++++-++++++--

Ghent+++++--------+

FBN1 sequencingNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNeg

TGFβR1/2 sequencingNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNegNeg

Abbreviations:

* Related patients: patient 2 = mother; patients 3 and 4 = sons.

§ Related patients: patient 8 = father; patient 9 = daughter.

+: present; -: absent; blank spaces: information not available

Neg: Negative

Summary of clinical profile of patients Abbreviations: * Related patients: patient 2 = mother; patients 3 and 4 = sons. § Related patients: patient 8 = father; patient 9 = daughter. +: present; -: absent; blank spaces: information not available Neg: Negative

Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using standard procedures (Gentra Puregene Blood Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA). MLPA assays were performed in duplicate according to the manufacturer's instructions [24]. The P065 and P066 Marfan Syndrome MLPA kits (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [25,26] that contain probes for 54 of the 66 FBN1 exons and 7 TGFβR2 exons, were used to detect deletions or duplications in FBN1. The P065 and P066 probemixes do not contain probes for FBN1 exons: 1, 11, 12, 21, 23, 28, 33, 38, 40, 49, 52, 60, and for TGFβR2 exon 2. P148 Loeys-Dietz MLPA kit (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [27] was used to detect deletions or duplications in TGFβR1 and TGFβR2 genes. The P148 probemix contains probes for all exons of the TGFβR1and TGFβR2 genes with the exception of TGFβR2 exon 2. Amplification products from each MLPA assay were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and results were analyzed using GeneMarker® software version 1.6 (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA). Deletions and duplications of the targeted regions were detected when the height ratios of the fluorescent peaks were lower or higher than the normal height ratio range of 0.7-1.4, respectively.

Sequencing

The coding exons and flanking intronic regions for TGFβR1, TGFβR2 and FBN1 were PCR-amplified for all patients. Primers sequences are available upon request. Amplicon fragments were bi-directly sequenced with universal M13 primers using the Big Dye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit and an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequences were compared to the TGFβR1 and TGFβR2 reference sequences (NM_004612.2 and NM_003242.5, respectively) and to the FBN1 reference sequence (NM_000138.4) using Mutation Surveyor software version 3.01 (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA). In our Institution, we sequenced the TGFβR1 and TGFβR2 from seven patients, and the FBN1 gene from two patients. The remaining cases were sequenced at the Connective Tissue Gene Test (CTGT) Laboratory.

Array-CGH 385 K Chromosome 15 Specific Array

DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes from patients 2 and 3 was extracted using standard techniques (Gentra Puregene Blood Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA). One μg of patients' DNA was labeled with 5'- Cy3 tagged nanomers while the female control was labeled with Cy5 nonamers (Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI). After purification by isopropanol precipitation, 6 μg each of labeled patients and reference DNA were combined. The mixture was hybridized to a NimbleGen 385 K Chromosome 15 Specific Array for 16 hours at 42 degrees in a MAUI Hybridization System (BioMicro Systems). The array was then washed according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI) and immediately scanned at 5 micron resolution. After scanning, fluorescence intensity raw data was extracted from the scanned images of the array using NimbleScan v2.5 software. For each of the spots on the array, normalized log2 ratios of the Cy3-labeled patient sample vs the Cy5-reference sample were generated using the SegMNT program. The data was visualized with Nexus v5.1 software (Biodiscovery, El Segundo, CA).

Results

In our study, we identified two novel large deletions in the FBN1 gene in four patients of two unrelated families who met clinical diagnostic criteria for Marfan syndrome. Of those, a novel FBN1 deletion encompassing exons 1-5 (Figure 1, Panel A) was identified in a 27-year-old male (patient 1; Tables 1 and 2) with dilated aortic root (3.99 cm, z-score of 3.76), mild tricuspid and mitral valve prolapse, tricuspid valve insufficiency, height 201 cm (6' 8") arm span 205.5 cm (6'10"), arachnodactyly, joint hypermobility, positive thumb and wrist signs, combined pectus carinatum/excavatum deformity of the anterior chest wall, and marked diffuse striae over the lower back and hips. Family history was remarkable for a diagnosis of Marfan syndrome in the mother, who died secondary to complications from surgery for aortic root dissection years prior, and one 30-year-old affected brother, who was unavailable for molecular testing.
Figure 1

. In panel A, MLPA results for patient 1 show the deletion of exons 1-5 of the FBN1 gene. In panel B, MLPA results for patient 2 with the deletion encompassing the whole FBN1 gene and an additional control probe (black arrow), located on the DUT (deoxyuridine triphosphatase) gene, 301 Kb upstream from FBN1 exon 1, on chromosome 15q15-q21.1. The same deletion was also found in patients 3 and 4 (data not shown).

Table 2

MLPA Assay Results for FBN1, TGFβR1, TGFβR2 and COL3A1

SubjectsDeletion/Duplication Results
Patient 1FBN1 exons 1-5 deletion
Patient 2FBN1 full gene deletion
Patient 3FBN1 full gene deletion
Patient 4FBN1 full gene deletion
Patient 5Normal
Patient 6Normal
Patient 7Normal
Patient 8Normal
Patient 9Normal
Patient 10Normal
Patient 11Normal
Patient 12Normal
Patient 13Normal
Patient 14Normal
. In panel A, MLPA results for patient 1 show the deletion of exons 1-5 of the FBN1 gene. In panel B, MLPA results for patient 2 with the deletion encompassing the whole FBN1 gene and an additional control probe (black arrow), located on the DUT (deoxyuridine triphosphatase) gene, 301 Kb upstream from FBN1 exon 1, on chromosome 15q15-q21.1. The same deletion was also found in patients 3 and 4 (data not shown). MLPA Assay Results for FBN1, TGFβR1, TGFβR2 and COL3A1 The other large deletion was found in a family of a mother and two sons (patients 2, 3, and 4, respectively; Tables 1 and 2), who harboured a deletion of the entire FBN1 gene. In those cases, all FBN1 probes and one control probe, located on the DUT (deoxyuridine triphosphatase) gene which is 301 Kb upstream from FBN1 exon 1 on chromosome 15q15-q21.1, were deleted (Figure 1, Panel B). A NimbleGen 385 K chromosome 15 specific array performed on patient 2 and 3 to refine the deletion size and boundaries revealed a 542 Kb deletion spanning bases chr15:46,208,030-46,750,218/Hg 18 Genome Build. This deleted region included 5 additional genes: SLC24A5, MYEF2, CTXN2, SLC12A1, and DUT (Figure 2). Clinically, patient 2 (mother), had a history of aortic valve replacement, and was status post Bentall procedure with a porcine valve in the setting of aortic dissection in 2005. She also had an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Skeletal involvement was characterized by a height of 190 cm (6'4"), arm span 197 cm (6'6"), pectus carinatum, arachnodactyly, and joint hypermobility. Patient 3 had aortic root (3.72 cm, z-score 3.22) as well as ascending aortic (2.69 cm) dilation, height 193.5 cm (6'5"), arm span 198.2 cm (6'7"), pectus excavatum deformity, positive thumb sign, positive wrist sign, joint hypermobility, and striae over both legs. Ocular examination showed bilateral ocular lens subluxation. His younger brother (patient 4) had a dilated aortic root (3.7 cm of diameter, z-score of 5.7), bicuspid aortic valve, pectus excavatum deformity, arachnodactyly, significant joint laxity with positive thumb sign and positive wrist sign, marked pes planus with downward deviation of the medial malleolus, height greater than the 99th percentile for age, an arm span at 105% of height, hypertelorism, and high narrow palate.
Figure 2

NimbleGen 385 K Chromosome 15 Specific Array showing a 542 kb region of chromosome 15 loss involving 6 genes (SLC24A5, MYEF2, CTXN2, SLC12A1, DUT, and FBN1), which was identical in patients 2 and 3.

NimbleGen 385 K Chromosome 15 Specific Array showing a 542 kb region of chromosome 15 loss involving 6 genes (SLC24A5, MYEF2, CTXN2, SLC12A1, DUT, and FBN1), which was identical in patients 2 and 3. In all other patients, including a 27-year-old male with classical Marfan syndrome phenotype (patient 14), no large deletions or duplications of the FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes were identified.

Discussion

Only a few large FBN1 deletions involving single and multiple exons have been reported and have related to the most severe MFS phenotypes. Among those, deletions of exons 13-49 in mosaic [12]; deletion of whole exon 33 [12]; inframe deletions of exon 2 [17], exons 42-43 [13], exon 52 [17] and exons 60-62 [16]; deletions spanning exon 1 [14], in-frame deletion of exons 44-46 [13] and an out-of-frame deletion of exons 58-63 [15] were previously described. Increased phenotypic severity does not particularly apply to patients with complete FBN1 deletions [18-22]. Recently, Hilhorst-Hofstee et al. (2010) [18] published a series of 10 patients with whole-FBN1 gene deletion presenting with phenotypes ranging from mild features of MFS to the classical MFS phenotype. In five of their patients, deletions extended beyond the FBN1 gene, spanning 1-9.4 Mb, including 9-46 genes. All of those deletions encompassed the same genes located upstream to the FBN1 as the ones involved in patient 2 and 3 of our cohort, although the breakpoints, size and position of the deletions differed between the two studies. Despite the additional deletion of five contiguous genes (SLC24A5, MYEF2, CTXN2, SLC12A1, DUT), our patients: 2, 3 and 4 had no other features than those that can be attributed to the deletion of FBN1. The same was observed in two patients from Hilhorst-Hofstee et al. [18] found to have deletion of 9 genes including FBN1. These findings not only support the role of haploinsufficiency of FBN1 in the pathogenesis of MFS, but also suggest that the function of SLC24A5, MYEF2, CTXN2, SLC12A1, DUT may not be impaired by complete loss of an entire allele. Three additional patients with 15 q deletions that included and extended beyond FBN1 were previously reported [19,21,22]. Their phenotype was characterized by marfanoid features predominantly affecting the skeletal system, with absent or mild aortic involvement. Psychomotor retardation and microcephaly was also described in two of those patients for whom the sizes and breakpoints of their 15 q deletions were unavailable [21,22]. The 16-year-old female described by Faivre et al. [19] harboured a 15q21.1q21.2 micro deletion of 2.97 Mb that encompassed the entire FBN1 and 12 additional genes, including the same genes as the ones involved in patient 2 and 3 of our cohort, although the breakpoints, size and position of the deletions differed between the two studies. As for our patients: 2, 3 and 4, no other features than those that can be attributed to the deletion of FBN1 were observed in their patient. An important consideration is that all patients in our study, who harboured a FBN1 deletion, fulfilled the Ghent criteria for MFS with major manifestations in the skeletal and cardiovascular systems. This is especially remarkable given the relatively young ages of patient 3 and 4, and suggests that the increased severity of MFS due to large FBN1 deletions may overcome the incomplete expression of MFS phenotype known to occur in children. In addition, the degree of severity and the distribution of the major manifestations differed among affected individuals, in keeping with the clinical variability seen in MFS, which in our patients, could be due to variable FBN1 expression from the normal allele. In our cohort, cases with non-classical phenotypes showed no large deletions and duplications in the genes targeted by MLPA. Technical limitations of available testing techniques, genetic heterogeneity and varied pathogenetic mechanisms involved in each of the connective tissue diseases with aortopathy may account for the lack of genotype-phenotype correlation in our subset of patients. For instance, commercially available kits for analysis of the FBN1 gene (P065 and P066) contain probes for 54 of the 66 FBN1 exons; and the probemix for TGFβR2 (P148) does not contain probes for exon 2. Therefore, a deletion or duplication of non-tested exons cannot be excluded leading to probable underreported deletions or duplications in this gene. Mosaicism and copy-number neutral rearrangements may also not be detected by MLPA. In addition, current molecular genetic testing of FBN1, TGFβR1, and TGFβR2 genes, although powerful, may miss mutations in the promoter region or in other noncoding sequences. Another consideration is that genes, such as TGFβR1and TGFβR2 may not harbour large deletions related to aortopathy with most of the reported TGFβR1 and TGFβR2 pathogenic mutations have been missense or splice site mutations [11], with all but one lying in the kinase domain of those genes [28]. Recently, a de novo 14.6 Mb duplication on chromosome 9q22.32q31.2, comprising TGFβR1 was found in a 17-year-old male with dysmorphic features, suggestive of LDS [29]. In contrast, no large deletions of TGFβR1and TGFβR2 have ever been reported in patients with aortopathy, which concurs with the findings from our dataset. Finally, the lack of genotype-phenotype correlation in some patients could be due to uncharacterized genetic elements in other loci, and as such, better evaluated by technologies targeting the whole genome or selected high-yield genes involved on aortopathies and Marfan-like phenotypes, such as MYH11, ACTA2, SLC2A10, NOTCH1 and FBN2 genes [9].

Conclusions

Our data expand the number of large FBN1 deletions, and emphasize the importance of screening for large genomic deletions in comprehensive genetic testing for connective tissue disorders featuring aortopathies, especially for those with classic phenotype of Marfan syndrome.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LVF participated in the design of the study, carried out part of the MLPA experiments, and wrote the manuscript; WWD carried out part of the MLPA experiments and performed the sequencing experiments; TL performed the array-CGH experiments in two patients; PP assisted WWD with sequencing experiments; AFR and AY were responsible for diagnosis and management of patients, participated in the design of the study and revision of the final manuscript; PBT conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/12/119/prepub
  24 in total

1.  Duplication of the TGFBR1 gene causes features of Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

Authors:  Jeroen Breckpot; Werner Budts; Francis De Zegher; Joris R Vermeesch; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 2.  Genetic basis of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections: focus on smooth muscle cell contractile dysfunction.

Authors:  Dianna M Milewicz; Dong-Chuan Guo; Van Tran-Fadulu; Andrea L Lafont; Christina L Papke; Sakiko Inamoto; Carrie S Kwartler; Hariyadarshi Pannu
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  De novo 15q21.1q21.2 deletion identified through FBN1 MLPA and refined by 244K array-CGH in a female teenager with incomplete Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Laurence Faivre; Philippe Khau Van Kien; Patrick Callier; Nathalie Ruiz-Pallares; Corinne Baudoin; Aurélie Plancke; Jean-Eric Wolf; Christel Thauvin-Robinet; Edith Durand; Delphine Minot; Véronique Dulieu; Jean-Damien Metaizeau; Bruno Leheup; Fanny Coron; Samuel Bidot; Frédéric Huet; Guillaume Jondeau; Catherine Boileau; Mireille Claustres; Francine Mugneret
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 4.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Mapping of familial thoracic aortic aneurysm/dissection with patent ductus arteriosus to 16p12.2-p13.13.

Authors:  Philippe Khau Van Kien; Flavie Mathieu; Limin Zhu; Alain Lalande; Christine Betard; Mark Lathrop; François Brunotte; Jean-Eric Wolf; Xavier Jeunemaitre
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Bart L Loeys; Harry C Dietz; Alan C Braverman; Bert L Callewaert; Julie De Backer; Richard B Devereux; Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Guillaume Jondeau; Laurence Faivre; Dianna M Milewicz; Reed E Pyeritz; Paul D Sponseller; Paul Wordsworth; Anne M De Paepe
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Multi-exon out of frame deletion of the FBN1 gene leading to a severe juvenile onset cardiovascular phenotype in Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar Singh; Diana Elligsen; Rüdiger Liersch; Stefanie Schubert; Brigitte Pabst; Mine Arslan-Kirchner; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Two mutations in Marfan syndrome resulting in truncated fibrillin polypeptides.

Authors:  K Kainulainen; L Y Sakai; A Child; F M Pope; L Puhakka; L Ryhänen; A Palotie; I Kaitila; L Peltonen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The clinical spectrum of complete FBN1 allele deletions.

Authors:  Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Ben C J Hamel; Joke B G M Verheij; Marry E B Rijlaarsdam; Grazia M S Mancini; Jan M Cobben; Cindy Giroth; Claudia A L Ruivenkamp; Kerstin B M Hansson; Janneke Timmermans; Henriette A Moll; Martijn H Breuning; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Mutations in the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT10 alter angiogenesis and cause arterial tortuosity syndrome.

Authors:  Paul J Coucke; Andy Willaert; Marja W Wessels; Bert Callewaert; Nicoletta Zoppi; Julie De Backer; Joyce E Fox; Grazia M S Mancini; Marios Kambouris; Rita Gardella; Fabio Facchetti; Patrick J Willems; Ramses Forsyth; Harry C Dietz; Sergio Barlati; Marina Colombi; Bart Loeys; Anne De Paepe
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  FBN1: The disease-causing gene for Marfan syndrome and other genetic disorders.

Authors:  Lynn Y Sakai; Douglas R Keene; Marjolijn Renard; Julie De Backer
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Intragenic multi-exon deletion in the FBN1 gene in a child with mildly dilated aortic sinus: a retrotransposal event.

Authors:  Maggie Brett; George Korovesis; Angeline H M Lai; Eileen C P Lim; Ene-Choo Tan
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 3.  Mechanisms of disease-associated SINE-VNTR-Alus.

Authors:  Abigail L Pfaff; Lewis M Singleton; Sulev Kõks
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Genetic dissection of marfan syndrome and related connective tissue disorders: an update 2012.

Authors:  S Hoffjan
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-06-12

5.  Aortic dilation, genetic testing, and associated diagnoses.

Authors:  Yuri A Zarate; Elizabeth Sellars; Tiffany Lepard; Xinyu Tang; R Thomas Collins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  A direct comparison of next generation sequencing enrichment methods using an aortopathy gene panel- clinical diagnostics perspective.

Authors:  Whitney L Wooderchak-Donahue; Brendan O'Fallon; Larissa V Furtado; Jacob D Durtschi; Parker Plant; Perry G Ridge; Alan F Rope; Angela T Yetman; Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Analysis of candidate colitis genes in the Gdac1 locus of mice deficient in glutathione peroxidase-1 and -2.

Authors:  R Steven Esworthy; Byung-Wook Kim; Guillermo E Rivas; Thomas L Leto; James H Doroshow; Fong-Fong Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Marfan syndrome with a complex chromosomal rearrangement including deletion of the FBN1 gene.

Authors:  Mileny Es Colovati; Luciana Rj da Silva; Sylvia S Takeno; Tatiane I Mancini; Ana R N Dutra; Roberta S Guilherme; Cláudia B de Mello; Maria I Melaragno; Ana B A Perez
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  A Case Based Approach to Clinical Genetics of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm/Dissection.

Authors:  Betti Giusti; Stefano Nistri; Elena Sticchi; Rosina De Cario; Rosanna Abbate; Gian Franco Gensini; Guglielmina Pepe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  The Molecular Genetics of Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Qiu Du; Dingding Zhang; Yue Zhuang; Qiongrong Xia; Taishen Wen; Haiping Jia
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.