Literature DB >> 21936697

Exposure characterization of metal oxide nanoparticles in the workplace.

Brian Curwin1, Steve Bertke.   

Abstract

This study presents exposure data for various metal oxides in facilities that produce or use nanoscale metal oxides. Exposure assessment surveys were conducted at seven facilities encompassing small, medium, and large manufacturers and end users of nanoscale (particles <0.1 μm diameter) metal oxides, including the oxides of titanium, magnesium, yttrium, aluminum, calcium, and iron. Half- and full-shift sampling consisting of various direct-reading and mass-based area and personal aerosol sampling was employed to measure exposure for various tasks. Workers in large facilities performing handling tasks had the highest mass concentrations for all analytes. However, higher mass concentrations occurred in medium facilities and during production for all analytes in area samples. Medium-sized facilities had higher particle number concentrations in the air, followed by small facilities for all particle sizes measured. Production processes generally had the highest particle number concentrations, particularly for the smaller particles. Similar to particle number, the medium-sized facilities and production process had the highest particle surface area concentration. TEM analysis confirmed the presence of the specific metal oxides particles of interest, and the majority of the particles were agglomerated, with the predominant particle size being between 0.1 and 1 μm. The greatest potential for exposure to workers occurred during the handling process. However, the exposure is occurring at levels that are well below established and proposed limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21936697     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.613348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  15 in total

1.  Size, composition, morphology, and health implications of airborne incidental metal-containing nanoparticles.

Authors:  Natalia I Gonzalez-Pech; Larissa V Stebounova; Irem B Ustunol; Jae Hong Park; T Renee Anthony; Thomas M Peters; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Impact of nanoparticles on human and environment: review of toxicity factors, exposures, control strategies, and future prospects.

Authors:  Muhammad Sajid; Muhammad Ilyas; Chanbasha Basheer; Madiha Tariq; Muhammad Daud; Nadeem Baig; Farrukh Shehzad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Systematic review of potential health risks posed by pharmaceutical, occupational and consumer exposures to metallic and nanoscale aluminum, aluminum oxides, aluminum hydroxide and its soluble salts.

Authors:  Calvin C Willhite; Nataliya A Karyakina; Robert A Yokel; Nagarajkumar Yenugadhati; Thomas M Wisniewski; Ian M F Arnold; Franco Momoli; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Evaluation of tumorigenic potential of CeO2 and Fe2O3 engineered nanoparticles by a human cell in vitro screening model.

Authors:  Todd A Stueckle; Donna C Davidson; Raymond Derk; Tiffany G Kornberg; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sandra V Pirela; Glen Deloid; Philip Demokritou; Sudjit Luanpitpong; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying Wang
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 5.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data.

Authors:  Hongbo Shi; Ruth Magaye; Vincent Castranova; Jinshun Zhao
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Comparison of the DiSCmini aerosol monitor to a handheld condensation particle counter and a scanning mobility particle sizer for submicrometer sodium chloride and metal aerosols.

Authors:  Jessica B Mills; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Comparison of field portable measurements of ultrafine TiO2: X-ray fluorescence, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ryan F LeBouf; Arthur L Miller; Christopher Stipe; Jonathan Brown; Nate Murphy; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.238

8.  Are metals emitted from electronic cigarettes a reason for health concern? A risk-assessment analysis of currently available literature.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Vassilis Voudris; Konstantinos Poulas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Emissions and exposures of graphene nanomaterials, titanium dioxide nanofibers, and nanoparticles during down-stream industrial handling.

Authors:  Karin Lovén; Sara M Franzén; Christina Isaxon; Maria E Messing; Johan Martinsson; Anders Gudmundsson; Joakim Pagels; Maria Hedmer
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Rat pulmonary responses to inhaled nano-TiO₂: effect of primary particle size and agglomeration state.

Authors:  Alexandra Noël; Michel Charbonneau; Yves Cloutier; Robert Tardif; Ginette Truchon
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.