Literature DB >> 21936253

AO tubular external fixation vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures: a single-center randomized clinical trial.

Mohammad Ali Mohseni1, Jafar Soleimanpour, Hossein Mohammadpour, Abolfazal Shahsavari.   

Abstract

Although the intramedullary nailing is thought to be the method of choice for treatment of closed tibial shaft, there is ongoing debate on the optimal surgical approach in patients with open types of these fractures. In addition, choosing between the reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing is still an issue for the orthopedic surgeons. In present study, we aimed to compare the outcome and consequences of OA tubular external fixation vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures. In a randomized clinical trial, 50 patients with open tibial shaft fractures (grades IIIA-IIIB) were recruited in Tabriz Shohada teaching centre in a 2-year period of time. They randomized in two equal groups underwent either AO tubular external fixation or unreamed intramedullary nailing. These 2 groups were matched for sex, age and fracture-grade. The follow-up time was one year. Union time, surgical outcome, postoperative complications and the ambulation time were compared between the two groups. Twenty five patients, 20 males and 5 females with a mean age of 30.80 +/- 5.24 years were allocated in unreamed intramedullary group and 25 other patients, 22 males and 3 females with a mean age of 28.92 +/- 8.88 years were studied in the external fixation group (p = 0.70 and 0.37, respectively). The two groups were matched for sex (p = 0.70) and age (p = 0.37). The time of union was 3, 4, 5 and 6 < or = weeks after operation in 28, 12, 32 and 28% of the cases in unreamed intramedullary group vs. 4, 12, 48 and 36% of the cases in external fixation group, respectively (p = 0.14). Post-operative infection, soft tissue injury, malunion and nonunion were documented in 16, 8, 0 and 4% of the cases in unreamed intramedullary group vs. 32, 12, 24 and 8% of the cases in external fixation group, respectively (p = 0.19, 0.50, 0.02 and 0.50, respectively). The mean ambulation time after operation was 2.92 +/- 2.43 weeks in the unreamed intramedullary nailing group vs. 2.68 +/- 2.14 weeks in the external fixation group (p = 0.71). Our results are in favor of unreamed intramedullary nailing against external fixation in treatment of open tibial shaft fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21936253     DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2011.490.495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1028-8880


  11 in total

1.  Which Surgical Treatment for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Results in the Fewest Reoperations? A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Clary J Foote; Gordon H Guyatt; K Nithin Vignesh; Raman Mundi; Harman Chaudhry; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Lehana Thabane; Paul Tornetta; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The use of adjuvant local antibiotic hydroxyapatite bio-composite in the management of open Gustilo Anderson type IIIB fractures. A prospective review.

Authors:  Noman Jahangir; Noman Niazi; Ahmed Aljawadi; Adam Reid; Jason Wong; Efstathios Drampalos; Anand Pillai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-09

3.  Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Fixation in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures in Tanzania: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Billy T Haonga; Max Liu; Patrick Albright; Sravya T Challa; Syed H Ali; Ann A Lazar; Edmund N Eliezer; David W Shearer; Saam Morshed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  A meta-analysis of external fixator versus intramedullary nails for open tibial fracture fixation.

Authors:  Xian Xu; Xu Li; Lin Liu; Wei Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Intramedullary nailing versus external fixation in Gustilo type III open tibial shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Francesca Giovannini; Luigi de Palma; Andrea Panfighi; Mario Marinelli
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2016-02-26

6.  Unexpected timely fracture union in matrix metalloproteinase 9 deficient mice.

Authors:  Masato Yuasa; Masanori Saito; Cesar Molina; Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge; Michael A Benvenuti; Nicholas A Mignemi; Atsushi Okawa; Toshitaka Yoshii; Herbert S Schwartz; Jeffry S Nyman; Jonathan G Schoenecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Open fractures of the lower extremity: Current management and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Abdel Rahim Elniel; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the additional benefit of local prophylactic antibiotic therapy for infection rates in open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Joyce Craig; Thomas Fuchs; Michelle Jenks; Kelly Fleetwood; Dominik Franz; Joel Iff; Michael Raschke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  External Fixation versus Unreamed Tibial Intramedullary Nailing for Open Tibial Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Lei Zhu; Jiajia Lu; Jun Ma; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Outcomes and Incidence of Deep Bone Infection in Grade III Diaphyseal Open Tibial Fractures: Circular Fixator vs Intramedullary Nail.

Authors:  Ibrahim Natalwala; Cher Bing Chuo; Isla Shariatmadari; Gavin Barlow; Elizabeth Moulder; Joanna Bates; Hemant Sharma
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2021 Sep-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.