Literature DB >> 21935602

18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.

Bas B Koolen1, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters, Tjeerd S Aukema, Wouter V Vogel, Hester S A Oldenburg, Jos A van der Hage, Cornelis A Hoefnagel, Marcel P M Stokkel, Claudette E Loo, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Emiel J Th Rutgers, Renato A Valdés Olmos.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate if 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) outperforms conventional imaging techniques for excluding distant metastases prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. Second, we assessed the clinical importance of false positive findings. One hundred and fifty four patients with stage II or III breast cancer, scheduled to receive NAC, underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and conventional imaging, consisting of bone scintigraphy, ultrasound of the liver, and chest radiography. Suspect additional lesions at staging examination were confirmed by biopsy and histopathology and/or additional imaging. Metastases that were detected within 6 months after the PET/CT scan were considered evidence of occult metastasis, missed by staging examination. Forty-two additional distant lesions were seen in 25 patients with PET/CT and could be confirmed in 20 (13%) of 154 patients. PET/CT was false positive for 8 additional lesions (19%) and misclassified the presence of metastatic disease in 5 (3%) of 154 patients. In 16 (80%) of 20 patients, additional lesions were exclusively seen with PET/CT, leading to a change in treatment in 13 (8%) of 154 patients. In 129 patients with a negative staging PET/CT, no metastases developed during the follow-up of 9.0 months. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT in the detection of additional distant lesions in patients with stage II or III breast cancer are 100, 96, 80, 100, and 97%, respectively. FDG PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging techniques in the detection of distant metastases in patients with untreated stage II or III breast cancer and is associated with a low false positive rate. PET/CT may be of additional value in the staging of breast cancer prior to NAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21935602     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1767-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  31 in total

1.  Whither the PET scan? The role of PET imaging in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gennari; Arnoldo Piccardo; Vania Altrinetti; Davide Corradengo; Giampiero Villavecchia; Andrea De Censi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Role of maximum standardized uptake value in fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts malignancy grade and prognosis of operable breast cancer: a multi-institute study.

Authors:  Takayuki Kadoya; Kenjiro Aogi; Sachiko Kiyoto; Norio Masumoto; Yoshifumi Sugawara; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations.

Authors:  Alexandre Cochet; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Olivier Humbert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Séverine Guiu; Charles Coutant; Bruno Coudert; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong Seon Park; Keon Wook Kang; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  (18) F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients - Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities?

Authors:  J Krammer; A Schnitzer; C G Kaiser; K A Buesing; E Sperk; J Brade; S Wasgindt; M Suetterlin; S O Schoenberg; E J Sutton; K Wasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  FDG-PET/CT for systemic staging of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Preoperative FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients: where are we going?

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Concetta De Cicco; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Detection of Internal Mammary Adenopathy in Patients With Breast Cancer by PET/CT and MRI.

Authors:  Maxine S Jochelson; Lizza Lebron; Stefanie S Jacobs; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Simon N Powell; Virgilio Sacchini; Gary A Ulaner; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.

Authors:  Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong Seon Park; Keon Wook Kang; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Won Hwa Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Mi Young Kim; Jin You Kim; Mirinae Seo; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.