OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the relation between intrahepatic (IH) hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels and the other HBV replicative intermediates and hepatocyte expression of HBV antigens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity, hepatitis B early antigen negativity, serum HBV DNA levels 10 copies/ml or more, and constantly or intermittently increased alanine aminotransferase levels were included. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included. There was a good correlation between the levels of IH HBV cccDNA and serum HBV DNA (P<0.001). Serum HBsAg levels were weakly correlated with IH HBV cccDNA levels and moderately correlated with serum HBV DNA (r=0.322, P=0.017; r=0.489, P=0.001, respectively). There were no significant correlation between serum HBsAg level and histologic activity index groups (P=0.691), but stage 0, 1, and greater than 2 fibrosis groups were positively correlated with serum HBsAg levels (P=0.019). IH cccDNA and serum HBV DNA were significantly different in hepatitis B core antigen staining groups (P=0.008 and <0.001, respectively) but there was no significant correlation between HBsAg staining groups and HBV replication markers. There was a weak correlation between serum HBsAg levels and IH HBsAg and hepatitis B core antigen levels (r=0.333, P=0.012; r=0.366, P=0.006, respectively). In multivariate analysis, alanine aminotransferase, age, fibrosis stage, and serum HBsAg quantitation were the most important factors predicting IH HBV cccDNA level. CONCLUSION: Histopathologic damage, serum HBV DNA levels, and IH HBV replication markers have a more complex and dynamic process. However, both serum and IH HBV replication markers provide important knowledge about the activity of the disease.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the relation between intrahepatic (IH) hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels and the other HBV replicative intermediates and hepatocyte expression of HBV antigens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity, hepatitis B early antigen negativity, serum HBV DNA levels 10 copies/ml or more, and constantly or intermittently increased alanine aminotransferase levels were included. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included. There was a good correlation between the levels of IH HBVcccDNA and serum HBV DNA (P<0.001). Serum HBsAg levels were weakly correlated with IH HBVcccDNA levels and moderately correlated with serum HBV DNA (r=0.322, P=0.017; r=0.489, P=0.001, respectively). There were no significant correlation between serum HBsAg level and histologic activity index groups (P=0.691), but stage 0, 1, and greater than 2 fibrosis groups were positively correlated with serum HBsAg levels (P=0.019). IH cccDNA and serum HBV DNA were significantly different in hepatitis B core antigen staining groups (P=0.008 and <0.001, respectively) but there was no significant correlation between HBsAg staining groups and HBV replication markers. There was a weak correlation between serum HBsAg levels and IH HBsAg and hepatitis B core antigen levels (r=0.333, P=0.012; r=0.366, P=0.006, respectively). In multivariate analysis, alanine aminotransferase, age, fibrosis stage, and serum HBsAg quantitation were the most important factors predicting IH HBVcccDNA level. CONCLUSION: Histopathologic damage, serum HBV DNA levels, and IH HBV replication markers have a more complex and dynamic process. However, both serum and IH HBV replication markers provide important knowledge about the activity of the disease.