Literature DB >> 21934177

False-negative tests in breast cancer management.

A Coolen1, K Leunen, J Menten, W van Steenbergen, P Neven.   

Abstract

We review the sensitivity of different diagnostic tests for breast cancer management based on recent experience in a 34-year-old patient. False-negative tests at diagnosis of early disease and of relapse resulted in diagnostic and therapeutic delays. Initial mammography and breast ultrasonography were falsely negative despite a palpable breast lump. Clinical examination and axillary ultrasound missed macroscopically involved lymph nodes. At relapse, metastatic lesions were missed despite symptoms, three years after primary treatment. CA 15-3 was normal; bone and liver metastases were missed by standard and more advanced imaging techniques including liver ultrasonography, nuclear bone scan and PET -CT scan. Worsening of clinical symptoms, lab results and abnormal tissue biopsies finally led to the diagnosis of extensive metastatic disease. Genetic screening showed an abnormality within the BRCA-1 region of unknown clinical importance. This review highlights 1) that diagnostic tests managing symptomatic breast cancer patients may have a low sensitivity, 2) the importance of clinical findings and other markers for disease, such as lactate dehydrogenase and 3) the need for diagnostic biopsies for clinically suspect symptoms despite normal imaging and biochemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21934177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth J Med        ISSN: 0300-2977            Impact factor:   1.422


  3 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: sensitivity for cancer in younger symptomatic women.

Authors:  Patsy Whelehan; Kulsam Ali; Sarah Vinnicombe; Graham Ball; Julie Cox; Paul Farry; Maggie Jenkin; Keith Lowry; Stuart A McIntosh; Rachel Nutt; Rachel Oeppen; Michael Reilly; Michaela Stahnke; Jim Steel; Yee Ting Sim; Violet Warwick; Louise Wilkinson; Dimitrios Zafeiris; Andrew J Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Autoantibody Response to ZRF1 and KRR1 SEREX Antigens in Patients with Breast Tumors of Different Histological Types and Grades.

Authors:  Lada Dyachenko; Kristina Havrysh; Anita Lytovchenko; Irina Dosenko; Stepan Antoniuk; Valeriy Filonenko; Ramziya Kiyamova
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  An Antibody-based Blood Test Utilizing a Panel of Biomarkers as a New Method for Improved Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Galit Yahalom; Daria Weiss; Ilya Novikov; Therese B Bevers; Laszlo G Radvanyi; Mei Liu; Benjamin Piura; Stefano Iacobelli; Maria T Sandri; Enrico Cassano; Tanir M Allweis; Arie Bitterman; Pnina Engelman; Luis M Vence; Marvin M Rosenberg
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2013-11-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.