Literature DB >> 21933880

Challenges using online surveys in a Danish population of people with type 2 diabetes.

Michaela Schiøtz1, Mette Bøgelund, Ingrid Willaing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate response rates for online and paper versions of an identical questionnaire and the differences between respondents to each and between respondents and non-respondents among a population with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: We mailed letters containing an invitation to complete an online questionnaire to 2045 individuals, followed by two reminders; the second included a paper version of the questionnaire.
RESULTS: In total, 1081 people responded to either version of the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 54%. Compared to total respondents, respondents completing the online version were more likely to be male, better educated, and younger, and have had diabetes for a shorter period of time. Compared to non-respondents, respondents were more likely to be male and have a lower hemoglobin A1c level.
CONCLUSION: Web-based surveys are capable of delivering a substantial number of responses cost-effectively. However, disadvantages related to selection bias should be taken into account, and mixed-mode methods should be considered when surveying populations with type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21933880     DOI: 10.1177/1742395311413307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Illn        ISSN: 1742-3953


  7 in total

1.  Cohort profile: Health in Central Denmark (HICD) cohort - a register-based questionnaire survey on diabetes and related complications in the Central Denmark Region.

Authors:  Lasse Bjerg; Else-Marie Dalsgaard; Kasper Norman; Anders Aasted Isaksen; Annelli Sandbæk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Construct and concurrent validity of a patient-reported adverse drug event questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sieta T de Vries; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Petra Denig
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Relationship between social network, social support and health behaviour in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  Nana F Hempler; Lene E Joensen; Ingrid Willaing
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The Association Between Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: The "For Your SweetHeart™" Survey.

Authors:  Leigh Perreault; Marilyn K Boardman; Jonathan Pak
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Considerations for conducting Web-based survey research with people living with human immunodeficiency virus using a community-based participatory approach.

Authors:  Kelly K O'Brien; Patricia Solomon; Catherine Worthington; Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco; Larry Baxter; Stephanie A Nixon; Rosalind Baltzer-Turje; Greg Robinson; Elisse Zack
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  COVID-19-related perceptions, context and attitudes of adults with chronic conditions: Results from a cross-sectional survey nested in the ComPaRe e-cohort.

Authors:  Viet-Thi Tran; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework.

Authors:  Luca M M Janssen; Ruben M W A Drost; Aggie T G Paulus; Kirsty Garfield; William Hollingworth; Sian Noble; Joanna C Thorn; Irina Pokhilenko; Silvia M A A Evers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.