Literature DB >> 21933329

Predictors of locally advanced and metastatic disease in patients with small renal masses.

Max Kates1, Ruslan Korets, Neda Sadeghi, Phillip M Pierorazio, James M McKiernan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? There is a small cohort of patients who have small renal masses with metastatic potential, yet risk factors for having this more aggressive disease are largely unknown. In a large sampling of the US population, older patients and men were more likely to have small renal masses at an advanced stage.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence metastatic and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the US population with small renal masses (SRMs). To determine what patient and tumour characteristics predict having more advanced SRMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry, we identified 14, 962 patients who were diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 with RCC ≤ 3 cm in size. Patients were separated by stage into those with metastatic, locally advanced and localized disease. Differences in baseline characteristics between patients in these three groups were assessed. After controlling for age, sex, grade, tumour size and year of surgery, a logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of having non-localized disease.
RESULTS: In the SEER cohort, 13, 574 (90.7%) patients with RCC ≤ 3 cm in size were diagnosed with localized disease, 938 (6.3%) patients had invasion beyond the kidney into regional lymph nodes or nearby organs, and 450 (3.0%) patients had distant metastasis. Patients with metastasis were older (65.9 years) compared to those with localized disease (59.5 years) (P < 0.001). Independent preoperative predictors of having more aggressive disease at diagnosis (locally advanced/metastatic) included older age, particularly age >70 years (odds ratio, OR, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.03-2.88), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.33-1.70) and tumour size >2.5 (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25-1.58).
CONCLUSIONS: A small subset (3%) of patients in the USA with RCC ≤ 3 cm in size have distant metastasis. Older patients, men and those with tumours 2.5-3.0 cm in size have a greater probability of presenting with non-localized disease . Clinicians should be aware that there is a risk of metastases in patients with SRMs and also familiarize themselves with the characteristics associated with advanced disease.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21933329     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10553.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Active surveillance for small renal masses.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Elias S Hyams; Jeffrey K Mullins; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

2.  Marital status and gender affect stage, tumor grade, treatment type and cancer specific mortality in T1-2 N0 M0 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michele Marchioni; Tristan Martel; Marco Bandini; Raisa S Pompe; Zhe Tian; Anil Kapoor; Luca Cindolo; Riccardo Autorino; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat; Luigi Schips; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer.

Authors:  Ilaria Lucca; Tobias Klatte; Harun Fajkovic; Michela de Martino; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  CT and MRI of small renal masses.

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Antonio C Westphalen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Landmarks in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jaimin R Bhatt; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  New tools for assessing the individual risk of metastasis in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Edwin Herrmann; Carsten Weishaupt; Birgit Pöppelmann; Carina Hillgruber; Gerald Pühse; Laura Maria Krabbe; Micha Feld; Martin Steinhoff; Tobias Goerge
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Age--an independent prognostic factor of clinical outcome in renal malignancies: results of a large study over two decades.

Authors:  Marie C Hupe; Axel S Merseburger; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Hendrik Eggers; Hendrik Rott; Gerd Wegener; Mahmoud Abbas; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas R Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Microvessel area as a predictor of sorafenib response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Saadia A Aziz; Joshua A Sznol; Laurence Albiges; Christopher Zito; Lucia B Jilaveanu; Robert L Camp; Bernard Escudier; Harriet M Kluger
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  The impact of tumour size on the probability of synchronous metastasis and survival in renal cell carcinoma patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Johann P Ingimarsson; Martin I Sigurdsson; Sverrir Hardarson; Vigdis Petursdottir; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Tomas Gudbjartsson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Association of Tumor Size with Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Yunlai Zhi; Xiao Li; Feng Qi; Xin Hu; Wenbo Xu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.