Literature DB >> 21932769

Standardization of a sample preparation and analytical workflow for proteomics of archival endometrial cancer tissue.

Addie Alkhas1, Brian L Hood, Kate Oliver, Pang-Ning Teng, Julie Oliver, David Mitchell, Chad A Hamilton, G Larry Maxwell, Thomas P Conrads.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to establish a standard operating procedure for mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic analysis of laser microdissected (LMD) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) uterine tissue. High resolution bioimage analysis of a large endometrial cancer tissue microarray immunostained for the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein enabled precise counting of cells to establish that there is an average of 600 cells/nL of endometrial cancer tissue. We sought to characterize the peptide recovery from various volumes of tissue gathered by LMD and processed/digested using the present methodology. We observed a nearly linear increase in peptide recovery amount with increasing tissue volume dissected. There was little discernible difference in the peptide recovery from stromal versus malignant epithelium, and there was no apparent difference in the day-to-day recovery. This methodology reproducibly results in 100 ng of digested peptides per nL of endometrial tissue, or ∼25 pg peptides/endometrial cancer cell. Results from liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS experiments to assess the impact of total peptide load on column on the total number of peptides and proteins identified from FFPE tissue digests prepared with the present methodology indicate a demonstrable increase in the total number of peptides identified up to 1000 ng, beyond which diminishing returns were observed. Furthermore, we observed no impact on the peptide identification rates from analyses of equivalent peptide amounts derived from lower volume LMD samples. These results show that this single-tube collection-to-injection proteomics (CTIP) workflow represents a straightforward, scalable, and highly reliable methodology for sample preparation to enable high throughput LMD-MS analysis of tissues derived from biopsy or surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21932769     DOI: 10.1021/pr2007736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  13 in total

1.  Downregulation of antigen presentation-associated pathway proteins is linked to poor outcome in triple-negative breast cancer patient tumors.

Authors:  Martin H Pedersen; Brian L Hood; Hans Christian Beck; Thomas P Conrads; Henrik J Ditzel; Rikke Leth-Larsen
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  A quantitative proteomic workflow for characterization of frozen clinical biopsies: laser capture microdissection coupled with label-free mass spectrometry.

Authors:  John P Shapiro; Sabyasachi Biswas; Anand S Merchant; Anjali Satoskar; Cenny Taslim; Shili Lin; Brad H Rovin; Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy; Michael A Freitas
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  BRCA1 deficiency in ovarian cancer is associated with alteration in expression of several key regulators of cell motility - A proteomics study.

Authors:  David M Gau; Jamie L Lesnock; Brian L Hood; Rohit Bhargava; Mai Sun; Kathleen Darcy; Soumya Luthra; Uma Chandran; Thomas P Conrads; Robert P Edwards; Joseph L Kelley; Thomas C Krivak; Partha Roy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  HYPERsol: High-Quality Data from Archival FFPE Tissue for Clinical Proteomics.

Authors:  Dylan M Marchione; Ilyana Ilieva; Kyle Devins; Danielle Sharpe; Darryl J Pappin; Benjamin A Garcia; John P Wilson; John B Wojcik
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Proteomic analysis of nuclei dissected from fixed rat brain tissue using expression microdissection.

Authors:  A R Blackler; N Y Morgan; B Gao; L R Olano; M D Armani; E Romantseva; J W Kakareka; R F Bonner; S Mukherjee; B Xiao; K Tran; T J Pohida; M R Emmert-Buck; M A Tangrea; S P Markey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Complete solubilization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue may improve proteomic studies.

Authors:  Shan-Rong Shi; Clive R Taylor; Carol B Fowler; Jeffrey T Mason
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Erlotinib, erlotinib-sulindac versus placebo: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled window trial in operable head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Neil D Gross; Julie E Bauman; William E Gooding; William Denq; Sufi M Thomas; Lin Wang; Simion Chiosea; Brian L Hood; Melanie S Flint; Mai Sun; Thomas P Conrads; Robert L Ferris; Jonas T Johnson; Seungwon Kim; Athanassios Argiris; Lori Wirth; Marina N Nikiforova; Jill M Siegfried; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Over-Expression of RNA Processing, Heat Shock, and DNA Repair Proteins in Breast Tumor Compared to Normal Tissue.

Authors:  Ten-Yang Yen; Richard Wong; Donald Pizzo; Moe Thein; Bruce A Macher; Leslie C Timpe
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Proteomic analysis of neurons microdissected from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded Alzheimer's disease brain tissue.

Authors:  Eleanor S Drummond; Shruti Nayak; Beatrix Ueberheide; Thomas Wisniewski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Critical comparison of sample preparation strategies for shotgun proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples: insights from liver tissue.

Authors:  Alessandro Tanca; Marcello Abbondio; Salvatore Pisanu; Daniela Pagnozzi; Sergio Uzzau; Maria Filippa Addis
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.