Literature DB >> 21932292

A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.

Marie-Laure Delignette-Muller1, Carole Forfait, Elise Billoir, Sandrine Charles.   

Abstract

The no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) is known to be based on a wrong usage of hypothesis tests, and the use of confidence intervals is preferred. The purpose of the present study is to provide an easy and proper way to interpret ecotoxicological tests based on simultaneous confidence intervals associated with the commonly used Dunnett procedure, and to show how these intervals may allow one to infer ECx values (effective concentrations).
Copyright © 2011 SETAC.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21932292     DOI: 10.1002/etc.686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  4 in total

1.  Survival data analyses in ecotoxicology: critical effect concentrations, methods and models. What should we use?

Authors:  Carole Forfait-Dubuc; Sandrine Charles; Elise Billoir; Marie Laure Delignette-Muller
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Alternatives to statistical decision trees in regulatory (eco-)toxicological bioassays.

Authors:  Felix M Kluxen; Ludwig A Hothorn
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Comparison Of Observation-Based And Model-Based Identification Of Alert Concentrations From Concentration-Expression Data.

Authors:  Franziska Kappenberg; Marianna Grinberg; Xiaoqi Jiang; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Effect-based tools for monitoring and predicting the ecotoxicological effects of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Authors:  Richard E Connon; Juergen Geist; Inge Werner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.