Literature DB >> 21931961

Short-duration transient visual evoked potential for objective measurement of refractive errors.

Aashish Anand1, Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes, Christopher C Teng, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Celso Tello.   

Abstract

This study examined effects of uncorrected refractive errors (RE) in a short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD t-VEP) system and investigated their role for objective measurement of RE. Refractive errors were induced by means of trial lenses in 35 emmetropic subjects. A synchronized single-channel EEG was recorded for emmetropia, and each simulated refractive state to generate 21 VEP responses for each subject. P100 amplitude (N75 trough to P100 peak) and latency were identified by an automated post-signal processing algorithm. Induced hypermetropia and myopia correlated strongly with both P100 amplitude and latency. To minimize the effect of baseline shift and waveform fluctuations, a VEP scoring system, based on software-derived P100 latency, amplitude and waveform quality, was used to estimate the RE. Using the VEP scores, a single VEP response had a high sensitivity and specificity for discerning emmetropia, small RE (<2 diopter) within a 2 diopter range and large RE (2-14 diopter) within a 4 diopter range. The VEP scoring system has a potential for objective screening of RE and for a more accurate 3-step objective refraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931961     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9289-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Yonatan Bahir; Rina Leibu; Ido Perlman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Retinoscopy and eye size.

Authors:  M Glickstein; M Millodot
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Refraction determined electrophysiologically. Responses to alternation of visual contours.

Authors:  M Millodot; L A Riggs
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-09

4.  Effects of contour sharpness and check-size on visually evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  M R Harter; C T White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation.

Authors:  J C Armington
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Age-dependent changes in the amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  N A Shaw; B R Cant
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-06

7.  Effect of refractive error on the visual evoked response.

Authors:  D W Collins; W M Carroll; J L Black; M Walsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-27

8.  The averaged electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human.

Authors:  R Spehlmann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-12

9.  Visual evoked responses to blank and to checkerboard patterned flashes.

Authors:  W J Rietveld; W E Tordoir; J R Hagenouw; J A Lubbers; T A Spoor
Journal:  Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl       Date:  1967

10.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

Authors:  Celso Tello; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Tiago S Prata; Peter Derr; Jayson Patel; John Siegfried; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Induced astigmatism biases the orientation information represented in multivariate electroencephalogram activities.

Authors:  Sangkyu Son; Joonsik Moon; Hyungoo Kang; Yee-Joon Kim; Joonyeol Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of refractive errors on visual evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Masaya Suzuki; Mizuki Nagae; Yuko Nagata; Naoya Kumagai; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.