| Literature DB >> 21931617 |
José Martin Pujolar1, Simone Vincenzi, Lorenzo Zane, Dusan Jesensek, Giulio A De Leo, Alain J Crivelli.
Abstract
A changing global climate can threaten the diversity of species and ecosystems. We explore the consequences of catastrophic disturbances in determining the evolutionary and demographic histories of secluded marble trout populations in Slovenian streams subjected to weather extremes, in particular recurrent flash floods and debris flows causing massive mortalities. Using microsatellite data, a pattern of extreme genetic differentiation was found among populations (global F(ST) of 0.716), which exceeds the highest values reported in freshwater fish. All locations showed low levels of genetic diversity as evidenced by low heterozygosities and a mean of only 2 alleles per locus, with few or no rare alleles. Many loci showed a discontinuous allele distribution, with missing alleles across the allele size range, suggestive of a population contraction. Accordingly, bottleneck episodes were inferred for all samples with a reduction in population size of 3-4 orders of magnitude. The reduced level of genetic diversity observed in all populations implies a strong impact of genetic drift, and suggests that along with limited gene flow, genetic differentiation might have been exacerbated by recurrent mortalities likely caused by flash flood and debris flows. Due to its low evolutionary potential the species might fail to cope with an intensification and altered frequency of flash flood events predicted to occur with climate change.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21931617 PMCID: PMC3169565 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Occurrence and intensity of flood events in the study area in the period 1999–2010, showing medium floods (m, 10 to 20-year recurrence interval) and major floods (M, 50 to 100-year recurrence interval).
| Population | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
| Zadlascica | A/m | A/M | A/M | S/m | A/m | |||||||
| Lipovscek | A/M | A/m | A/m | A/M | A/M | A/M | A/m | |||||
| Sevnica | A/m | A/M | A/m | S/m | S/m | |||||||
| Studenc | A/m | A/m | A/M | A/m | S/m | S/m |
A = Autumn; S = Spring.
Figure 1Location of all marble trout sampling locations.
Microsatellite loci analyzed in marble trout including microsatellite type, repeat motif, size range (in bp), maximum number of alleles per locus (NA), and species in which the microsatellites were originally developed (Salmo salar, S. trutta, S. marmoratus).
| Name | Type | Motif | Size | NA | MX | Species | Reference |
| CA048828 | EST | CA | 246–276 | 4 | 1 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA048687 | EST | AC | 216 | 1 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA060208 | EST | CA | 166 | 1 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA039543 | EST | AT | 145–147 | 2 | 1 |
| Vasemagi |
| CB515794 | EST | GT | 262–264 | 2 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CB512797 | EST | AC | 375–407 | 7 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA060177 | EST | TGAC | 300–320 | 5 | 1 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA769358 | EST | AC | 98 | 1 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA053293 | EST | AC | 156–158 | 2 | 1 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA040282 | EST | AT | 121 | 1 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA059136 | EST | TA | 329–355 | 8 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA058902 | EST | TA | 179–181 | 2 | 2 |
| Vasemagi |
| CA050376 | EST | GT | 283–291 | 2 | 1 |
| Vasemagi |
| BG935488 | EST | CAAT | 131–143 | 2 | 1 |
| Vasemagi |
| CL47345 | EST | TG | 220–232 | 3 | 1 |
| Siemon |
| Str73 | Genomic | CT | 151–165 | 3 | 1 |
| Estoup |
| Str151 | Genomic | GT | 216 | 1 | 1 |
| Estoup |
| Str85 | Genomic | CT | 171–181 | 3 | 2 |
| Presa & Guyomard 1996 |
| Str543 | Genomic | CT | 130–134 | 3 | 1 |
| Presa & Guyomard 1996 |
| Str591 | Genomic | CT | 152–156 | 3 | 2 |
| Presa & Guyomard 1996 |
| T3-13 | Genomic | GT | 162–168 | 4 | 2 |
| Estoup |
| Strutta58 | Genomic | GT | 104–124 | 4 | 2 |
| Poteaux |
| Ssa85 | Genomic | GT | 108 | 1 | 2 |
| O'Really |
| BFRO001 | Genomic | TG | 202–212 | 3 | 1 |
| Snoj |
Information is also given on the combination of loci used in each multiplex (MX, 1 and 2).
Summary of genetic variability estimates across samples including number of individuals (N), expected (H e) and observed (H o) heterozygosities, total (TNA) and mean (MNA) number of alleles and allelic richness (AR).
| Sample | N |
|
| TNA | MNA | AR |
|
| 30 | 0.179 | 0.166 | 29 | 1.56 | 1.50 |
|
| 15 | 0.173 | 0.163 | 28 | 1.50 | 1.49 |
|
| 30 | 0.116 | 0.141 | 30 | 1.67 | 1.45 |
|
| 28 | 0.094 | 0.112 | 26 | 1.44 | 1.33 |
|
| 30 | 0.128 | 0.138 | 32 | 1.78 | 1.60 |
|
| 30 | 0.102 | 0.110 | 30 | 1.61 | 1.43 |
|
| 30 | 0.242 | 0.204 | 35 | 1.94 | 1.75 |
|
| 30 | 0.205 | 0.189 | 34 | 1.89 | 1.72 |
Pairwise F ST estimates (above diagonal) and genetic distances (DCE, below diagonal) between samples, labeled as in Table 3.
| Sample | 1A | 1B | 2A | 2B | 3A | 3B | 4A | 4B |
|
| *** | 0.001 | 0.737 | 0.758 | 0.707 | 0.733 | 0.673 | 0.681 |
|
| 0.004 | *** | 0.752 | 0.779 | 0.719 | 0.753 | 0.679 | 0.673 |
|
| 0.712 | 0.719 | *** | 0.001 | 0.738 | 0.761 | 0.693 | 0.717 |
|
| 0.735 | 0.743 | 0.007 | *** | 0.755 | 0.778 | 0.709 | 0.734 |
|
| 0.658 | 0.669 | 0.606 | 0.601 | *** | 0.002 | 0.649 | 0.673 |
|
| 0.673 | 0.680 | 0.598 | 0.592 | 0.011 | *** | 0.668 | 0.694 |
|
| 0.833 | 0.839 | 0.753 | 0.779 | 0.630 | 0.673 | *** | 0.040 |
|
| 0.787 | 0.793 | 0.725 | 0.753 | 0.595 | 0.609 | 0.021 | *** |
*p<0.05;
**p<0.001.
Results from AMOVA analysis partitioning genetic differentiation among locations (4 locations: Zadlascica, Lipovscek, Sevnica and Studenc) and among samples within locations (pre- and post-flood samples).
| AMOVA | Sum of squares | Var |
|
|
| 1124.41 | 3.46 |
|
|
| 8.88 | 0.02 |
|
|
| 570.76 | 1.38 | |
|
| 1704.06 | 4.86 |
|
Figure 2Plots of the values of the first and second principal coordinates obtained from Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards (1967) chord distances at all loci.
Samples labeled as in Table 3. A = pre-flood samples; B = post-flood samples. Stress value = 0.062.
Figure 3Plots of the simulated points from the marginal posterior distributions of log10 (r) (x-axis) and log10 (tf) (y-axis).
Samples labeled as in Table 3.
Summary statistics of MSVAR across all locations, including the genetic parameter θ = 2N 0μ, which was calculated using a mutation rate of μ = 10−4, r = N 0/N 1 (N 0 = current effective population size; N 1 = effective population size at the time of population expansion or decline), and t f = t a/N 0 (t a = number of generations since the beginning of the expansion/decline).
| 1A | 1B | 2A | 2B | 3A | 3B | 4A | 4B | |
|
| 0.0006 | 0.0024 | 0.0006 | 0.0063 | 0.0069 | 0.0082 | 0.0014 | 0.0023 |
|
| 3.8×10−5 | 1.1×10−4 | 9.0×10−4 | 9.2×10−4 | 6.1×10−4 | 1.1×10−3 | 1.6×10−4 | 1.1×10−4 |
|
| 14.52 | 11.27 | 7.67 | 7.43 | 8.18 | 6.47 | 7.13 | 8.44 |
|
| 3 | 12 | 31 | 32 | 35 | 41 | 7 | 12 |
| (1–27) | (1–66) | (1–257) | (1–259) | (1–299) | (1–396) | (1–55) | (1–68) | |
|
| 8.0×105 | 1.5×105 | 8.9×104 | 7.6×104 | 1.1×105 | 4.1×104 | 6.0×104 | 1.1×105 |
| (5.6×104–1×106) | (3.6×104–4.3×105) | (8×103–4.7×105) | (8×103–3.7×105) | (1.6×104–4.3×105) | (5.4×103–1.7×105) | (1.7×104–1.7×105) | (2.4×104–3×105) | |
|
| 31 | 106 | 172 | 179 | 215 | 268 | 83 | 73 |
| (1–264) | (1–529) | (1–1400) | (1–1507) | (1–1902) | (1–2300) | (1–301) | (1–405) |
95% confidence interval in parenthesis. Samples labelled as in Table 3.
Results of the bottleneck analyses.
| Sample | P value (Wilcoxon test) | M value (M_P_VAL) | p value (M_P_VAL) |
|
| 0.009 | 0.566 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.043 | 0.518 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.103 | 0.661 | 0.038 |
|
| 0.381 | 0.733 | 0.343 |
|
| 0.691 | 0.744 | 0.328 |
|
| 0.606 | 0.793 | 0.751 |
|
| 0.044 | 0.638 | 0.011 |
|
| 0.193 | 0.610 | 0.003 |
BOTTLENECK: p-value of the one-tail Wilcoxon test for heterozygote excess. M_P_VAL: M is the observed average ratio between number of alleles (k) and range in allele size (r) across loci. Samples labelled as in Table 3.