Literature DB >> 21931525

Allozyme differentiation of two populations of the genus Neoplecostomus Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1888 (Teleostei, Loricariidae) from the upper Paraná River basin, Brazil.

Ana Flávia Reusing1, Erasmo Renesto, Fábio F Roxo, Cláudio H Zawadzki.   

Abstract

Allozyme electrophoresis was used to examine 12 enzymatic systems in two populations of the genus Neoplecostomus from the Paraná River basin. Samples of Neoplecostomus sp. 1 were collected in Paraitinguinha stream of the Tietê River basin, in the municipality of Salesópolis, São Paulo State, and those of Neoplecostomus sp. 2 from São Domingos stream of the Rio Grande River basin, in the municipality of Muzambinho, Minas Gerais State. The genetic variability of the two populations was estimated by Nei's expected heterozygosity and was considered lower than average for populations of freshwater fish. The proportion of polymorphic loci was low (only 5.26% for the locus Idh). The low frequency of heterozygosity for both populations revealed a high fixation of alleles for each locus. Homozygote excess was observed in both populations. The values of Nei's genetic identity and the presence of loci with different allele frequencies in both populations may imply that the two populations belong to different species. The genetic variability between populations was compared to other data for loricariids.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoplecostominae; Neotropical fishes; allozymes; genetic variability

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931525      PMCID: PMC3168193          DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Introduction

The order Siluriformes is the most diverse and well-distributed within the Ostariophysi, and includes 3093 species, 478 genera and 36 families (Ferraris Jr, 2007). In the Neotropical region, there are 1648 nominal species grouped in 15 families (Reis ). The distribution of Neotropical Siluriformes appears to be limited by temperature since most of the species live in tropical areas, with few reaching the southern portion of South America or the northern edge of North America (Nelson, 2006). Many species of this order occur in small headwater streams with clear water, strong currents and a high oxygen content, while others have adapted to stagnant and often polluted waters in which oxygen levels are extremely low (Burgess, 1989; M.R. Britto, 2002, Doctoral thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil). Among the headwater fishes of the southeastern region of South America, representatives of the subfamily Neoplecostominae are the most prominent. There is controversy regarding which genera belong to the Neoplecostominae, although important progress has been made through the phylogenetic contributions of Montoya-Burgos , Cramer and Chiachio et al. (2009). Within the Neoplecostominae, representatives of the genus Neoplecostomus occur in the headwater streams of southern and southeastern Brazil. Langeani (1990), who reviewed the genus Neoplecostomus, recognized N. microps and N. granosus, and described N. paranensis, N. espiritosantensis, N. ribeirensis and N. franciscoensis. Bizerril (1995) subsequently described N. variipictus from the Paraíba do Sul River basin, and Zawadzki recently described three new species of Neoplecostomus (N. corumba, N. selenae and N. yapo) from the upper Paraná River basin. Neoplecostomus species are morphologically very similar (Langeani, 1990), although some can be very different genetically, as shown by Zawadzki , who compared Neoplecostomus corumba (Neoplecostomus sp. in that work) and N. paranensis using allozyme electrophoresis. In view of the difficulty in identifying species of this genus, in the present study, two populations of Neoplecostomus, one from São Domingos stream of the Grande River in the municipality of Muzambinho, in Minas Gerais State, and another from Paraitiguinha stream of the Tietê River basin in the municipality of Salesópolis, São Paulo State (both in the upper Paraná River basin) were compared using allozyme gel electrophoresis in order to improve our understanding of the biodiversity within this genus.

Material and Methods

Twenty-nine specimens of Neoplecostomus sp. 1 (Figure 1A) were collected in Paraitinguinha stream (Tietê River basin) at 23°30′39,84” S/45°51′32,22” W and an altitude of 786 meters in the municipality of Salesópolis, São Paulo State (Figure 2). Twenty specimens of Neoplecostomus sp. 2 (Figure 1B) were collected in São Domingos stream (Grande River basin), 21°20′47,22” S/46°28′00,79” W and an altitude of 1021 meters in the municipality of Muzambinho, Minas Gerais State (Figure 2). Specimens of the two populations reported here differed morphologically from the four species of Neoplecostomus described for the upper Paraná River basin by the following characters: (1) a well-developed adipose fin distinguished them from N. corumba and N. paranensis that have a reduced/absent adipose fin or no adipose fin, respectively, and (2) homogeneously dispersed hypertrophied odontodes in the dorsal region of the head and not bordered by swollen skin vs. more hypertrophied odontodes in front of the eyes and the lateral margin of the snout surrounded by swollen skin in N. selenae, and more hypertrophied odontodes bordered by hypertrophied skin only on the lateral margin of the snout in N. yapo.
Figure 1

A) Neoplecostomus sp. 1, CP = 102.2 mm, collected in the Paraitinguinha stream, Salesópolis, SP, NUP6103; B) Neoplecostomus sp. 2, CP = 75.2 mm, collected in São Domingos stream, Muzambinho, MG, NUP 6102.

Figure 2

Geographic location of sampling sites for Neoplecostomus sp. 1 (N. sp. 1) and Neoplecostomus sp. 2 (N. sp. 2).

The fish were frozen in liquid nitrogen and transported to the Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Voucher specimens were deposited in the ichthyological collection of the Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura (Nupélia) of the Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Neoplecostomus sp. 1 under accession number NUP 6102 and Neoplecostomus sp. 2 under accession number NUP 6103). Samples of liver and white muscle were homogenized with a plastic pestle in polypropylene tubes (1.5 mL) containing 100 μL of 0.02 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. To the liver samples 100 μL of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) was added to facilitate homogenization of this fatty tissue (Pasteur ). Aliquots of the protein extracts were applied to 15% corn starch (Penetrose 50) gels (Val ) by using small (4 mm x 8 mm) Whatman® 3 MM filter paper strips soaked in the samples followed by horizontal electrophoresis under refrigeration. Two buffer solutions were used: 0.135 M Tris/0.043 M citric acid, pH 7.0 (TC), diluted 15 times during preparation of the gel, and 0.18 M Tris/0.1 M boric acid/0.004 M EDTA, pH 8.6 (TBE), diluted four times during preparation of the gel. The gels were run for 17 h (current of ∼50 V at the ends of the gel). After electrophoresis, the gels were cut horizontally into two slices that were then incubated with specific histochemical solutions to detect the bands of enzyme activity in each system, according to standard protocols (Murphy ). The genetic interpretation of the electrophoretic profiles was based on the structure of each enzyme, according to Ward . Genetic variability was estimated by calculating the expected (He) and observed (Ho) heterozygosities, according to Nei (1978), as well as genetic identity (I) and distance (D), which were calculated from the allele frequencies. All analyses were done using the software GENEPOP 1.31 (Yeh ).

Results

We analyzed 12 enzyme systems (Table 1) in two populations of Neoplecostomus and obtained 19 loci (Table 2) with a total of 29 alleles. Of the 49 individuals analyzed, 29 belonged to the morphotype Neoplecostomus sp. 1, collected in Paraitinguinha stream, and 20 to Neoplecostomus sp. 2, collected in São Domingos stream. The electrophoretic patterns of the 12 enzyme systems obtained in this study were similar to those reported by Zawadzki .
Table 1

Name, Enzyme Commission number (E.C. No.), tissue, buffer, and number of loci for each enzyme in Neoplecostomus sp. 1 from Paraitinguinha stream (Salesópolis, SP) and Neoplecostomus sp. 2 from São Domingos stream (Muzambinho, MG).

Enzyme (abbreviation)E.C. No.TissueBufferLoci
Aspartate aminotransferase (AAT)2.6.1.1LTBE1
Acid phosphatase (ACP)3.1.3.2LTBE1
Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)1.1.1.1LTBE1
Esterase (EST)3.1.1.1LTBE2
Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH)1.1.1.8MTC2
Glucose dehydrogenase (GDH)1.1.1.47LTBE1
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1.1.1.42MTC1
L-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)1.1.1.27MTC2
Malate dehydrogenase (MDH)1.1.1.37MTC3
Peroxidase (PER)1.11.1.6LTBE2
Phosphoglucomutase (PGM)5.4.2.2MTC1
Sorbitol dehydrogenase (SORB)1.1.1.14LTC2

L – lier, M – muscle, TBE – Tris/borate/EDTA buffer, pH 8.7 (Boyer ) and TC – Tris/citrate buffer, pH 7.0 (Shaw and Prasad, 1970).

Table 2

Allele frequencies at 19 loci in Neoplecostomus sp. 1 from Paraitinguinha stream (Salesópolis, SP) and Neoplecostomus sp. 2 from São Domingos stream (Muzambinho, MG).

LociAllelesSalesópolis (N = 29)Muzambinho (N = 20)
Aat*a-1.0000
b1.0000-
Acp*a-1.0000
b1.0000-
Adh*a-1.0000
b1.0000-
Est-1a1.00001.0000
Est-2a1.00001.0000
Gdh*a-1.0000
b1.0000-
G3pdh-1a1.00001.0000
G3pdh-2a1.00001.0000
Idh*a-1.0000
b0.9310-
c0.0690-
Ldh-Aa1.00001.0000
Ldh-Ba1.00001.0000
Mdh-Aa1.00001.0000
Mdh-Ba1.00001.0000
Mdh-C*a-1.0000
b1.0000-
Per-1a1.00001.0000
Per-2a1.00001.0000
Pgm*a1.0000-
b1.0000
Sorb-1*a-1.0000
b1.0000
Sorb-2*a-1.0000
b1.0000-

N = number of specimens analyzed. Asterisks indicate loci with allele frequencies that differed significantly between populations.

The two populations differed at nine (Aat, Acp, Adh, Gdh, Idh, Mdh-C, Pgm and Sorb-1-2) of the 19 loci. These loci were diagnostic, i.e., they possessed alleles for each morphotype with a frequency of 100%. As shown in Table 2, Neoplecostomus sp. 2 (from Muzambinho) was monomorphic at all 19 loci, whereas Neoplecostomus sp. 1 (from Salesópolis) was monomorphic at all but one locus (5.26% polymorphism; only the Idh loci showed allelic variation). The expected heterozygosity (He) for Neoplecostomus sp. 1 was 0.0069, while the observed heterozygosity (Ho) was 0.0073. Based on the gene frequencies, the genetic identity (I) and distance (D) were 0.5281 and 0.6384, respectively. The Nei (1978) genetic distance represents the average number of nucleotide substitutions per locus (detectable by electrophoresis) that have accumulated in populations since they diverged from a common ancestor, i.e., the substitution is proportional to evolutionary time (Dobzhansky ; Thorpe, 1982; Thorpe and Solé-Cava, 1994). The negative value of FIS (−0.0741) indicated an excess of heterozygotes for the Idh locus in the Neoplecostomus sp. 1 population. On the other hand, the mean FIT value (0.9844) indicated an excess of homozygotes for both species. According to Wright (1978), the FST statistic reflects genetic differentiation between two populations. The average FST score for the loci analyzed was 0.9855, indicating marked genetic differentiation between the two samples; for nine loci (Aat, Acp, Adh, Gdh, Mdhc, Pgm, Sorb-1 and Sorb- 2) the FST value was 1.00.

Discussion

According to Thorpe and Solé-Cava (1994), populations belonging to the same species have genetic identity values (I) > 0.85, whereas those belonging to different genera have I < 0.35 and species belonging to the same genus have I values of 0.35–0.85. The I value for Neoplecostomus sp. 1 and Neoplecostomus sp. 2 was 0.5281 (with D = 0.6384), indicating that these populations belong to two species of the same genus. Neoplecostomus species are morphologically very similar (Langeani, 1990), but very different genetically, as shown by Zawadzki . The detection of fixed divergent alleles in syntopic populations of diploid organisms generally reflects a restricted gene flow and, consequently, the existence of different biological species (Richardson ; Murphy ). As shown here, nine of the 19 loci surveyed were diagnostic (Table 2), leading us to conclude that the two populations studied represented different species. In contrast to the marked genetic divergence seen here between the two populations, other studies based on allozyme characters in allopatric populations of loricariid fishes have found no diagnostic markers. For example, Zawadzki found no fixed diagnostic markers for three populations of Hypostomus regani from the Corumbá River, Itaipu Reservoir (both in the upper Paraná River basin) and Manso River (in the Paraguay River basin). Similarly, Limeira found no fixed markers in two populations of Rineloricaria pentamaculata above and below an 80 m high waterfall on the Ivaí River. Strieder also found no fixed markers for four populations of N. yapo along tributaries of the Tibagi and Pirapó rivers. The lack of genetic divergence in these loricariid populations highlights the relevance of the marked differentiation seen between Neoplecostomus sp. 1 and Neoplecostomus sp. 2. The finding that almost half of the surveyed loci were fixed to different alleles in each population suggests that there are strong geographic barriers to Neoplecostomus fish that try to move from the headwaters of the Tietê River basin to the headwaters of the Grande River basin, or vice versa. Since specimens of Neoplecostomus occur only in medium to small headwater streams, we believe that the main channel of large rivers such as the Tietê, Paraná and Grande acts as a barrier to free dispersion. The finding that Neoplecostomus sp. 2 was monomorphic for the 19 loci while Neoplecostomus sp. 1 was polymorphic at only a single locus (Idh) contrasted with other studies in which the percentage of polymorphic loci in loricariids was generally greater than that observed here. Zawadzki reported that several loci (Gpi-B, Ldh-B and Pgm-A) were polymorphic in a population of Neoplecostomus sp. (= N. corumba) whereas no polymorphism was observed in N. paranensis. Zawadzki found that the percentage of polymorphic loci in three populations of Hypostomus from the Iguaçu River basin ranged from 20 to 40%, whereas Paiva detected 20% polymorphic loci in H. strigaticeps and Hypostomus sp. 1 and no polymorphism in Hypostomus sp. 2 from Ribeirão Maringá. The He values in the family Loricariidae vary considerably. Zawadzki found low He values of 0.011 in Hypostomus derbyi and 0.017 in H. myersi from the Iguaçu River basin, but an extremely high value (He = 0.107) for another species of Hypostomus (Hypostomus sp.) from the Itaipu Reservoir in the Paraná River basin (Zawadzki ). The He of Neoplecostomus sp. 1 in the present study was 0.0069, a low value when compared to that observed by Zawadzki for Neoplecostomus sp. (He = 0.030) and also low in relation to other loricariids from the Paraná-Paraguay River basin (Zawadzki , 2004b; Paiva ; Renesto ; Ito ; Strieder ). The He for the population of Neoplecostomus sp. 2 was zero, as also reported for N. paranensis from Hortelã stream (Zawadzki ). The genetic variability in Neoplecostomus sp. 1 and Neoplecostomus sp. 2 is low when compared to the average He of 0.051 estimated for 195 species of different fish species around the world (Ward ). According to Zawadzki , the unusual absence of allozyme genetic variability in N. paranensis from Hortelã stream could be explained by the endogamic process and ecological restrictions imposed by geographical or environmental barriers to species of Neoplecostomus. Likewise, in the present study, the low levels of genetic variability for the two populations of Neoplecostomus may indicate that they are mainly sedentary and probably restricted to small areas. Loricariids are generally non-migratory (Burgess, 1989; Montoya-Burgos, 2003). Moreover, the short length of most Neoplecostomus species and the currently restricted distribution of their populations (limited to head-waters) point towards a low rate of migration (Chiachio ). The sedentary nature of these fish leads to mating within the same family group and results in low genetic variability. These characteristics suggest a possible restricted range and reduced gene flow among Neoplecostomus species compared to other fish species. A reduction in gene flow and genetic events, such as inbreeding, may favor rapid speciation and endemism (Strieder ). In addition, other evolutionary forces may also affect Neoplecostomus species. For example, stochastic events such as genetic drift could lead to the fixation of alternative alleles (Kerr and Wright, 1954) in these presumably small populations and may provide a reasonable explanation for the low intraspecific and high interspecific variation in Neoplecostomus species. Our findings suggest that other genetically-differentiated populations may be revealed as more headwater streams in southeastern Brazil are sampled.
  10 in total

1.  Historical biogeography of the catfish genus Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), with implications on the diversification of Neotropical ichthyofauna.

Authors:  J I Montoya-Burgos
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Myoglobin: in herited structural variation in man.

Authors:  S H BOYER; D C FAINER; M A NAUGHTON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Molecular systematic and historical biogeography of the armored Neotropical catfishes Hypoptopomatinae and Neoplecostominae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae).

Authors:  Márcio Cesar Chiachio; Claudio Oliveira; Juan I Montoya-Burgos
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster: I. Forked. 1954.

Authors:  W E Kerr; S Wright
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2009-07-07

6.  Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes--a compilation of recipes.

Authors:  C R Shaw; R Prasad
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.890

7.  Allozyme relationships in hypostomines (Teleostei: Loricariidae) from the Itaipu Reservoir, Upper Rio Paraná basin, Brazil.

Authors:  Cláudio Henrique Zawadzki; Erasmo Renesto; Roberto Esser dos Reis; Maurício Osvaldo Moura; Rogério Pincela Mateus
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Allozyme differentiation of four populations of Hypostomus (Teleostei: Loricariidae) from Ribeirão Keller, a small stream in the upper Rio Paraná basin, Brazil.

Authors:  Cláudio H Zawadzki; Erasmo Renesto; Suzana de Paiva; Márcia C S Lara-Kamei
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Biochemical comparison of two Hypostomus populations (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) from the Atlântico Stream of the upper Paraná River basin, Brazil.

Authors:  Kennya F Ito; Erasmo Renesto; Cláudio H Zawadzki
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  Allozyme comparison of two populations of Rineloricaria (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) from the Ivaí River, upper Paraná River basin, Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel M Limeira; Erasmo Renesto; Cláudio H Zawadzki
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.771

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.